This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Someone seemingly claiming to be Dermot ( User:Yahuel) has added/altered text to the effect that the Sydney Guardians as run by Frater Carfax has no especial claim to being the Society of the Guardians, and that any person can if they so wish call themselves a Guardian. This sounds suspiciously like a continuation of the old arguments between Dermot and Leonard, and this article is not an appropriate war-ground. If there are opposing views to what's published, and they appear in a reliable source, then we can cite them in the article, with attributions to their sources. Otherwise we can't publish them. If anyone feels that the information currently in the article comes from unreliable sources, then we can discuss that too. But I don't want to see this article turn into a battle between unverifiable positions. Fuzzypeg ★ 03:56, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
Good point Fuzzypeg. Seeing the it is okay to claim 6th degree or 666th degree prompted me to added in a few things, which I have provided with references. I.e. Document on the 7 grades of the Guardians by Michael Freedman. So the 666th degree claim by so-called Yahuel is completely wrong and not anything to do with the Guardians. If this or any any other verifiable documents that are useful to you please email me at guild_decabalis@yahoo.com though I send the bulk to Frater Carfax in Australia, I do have a some materials remaining - Jean de Cabalis. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.237.40.79 ( talk) 06:06, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest was declined. The reviewer is requesting that the editor with the conflict of interest describe the proposed the changes on the talk page rather than in e-mail. |
Request for edit from someone in the Wiki community (as this page needs tidying up). I have neither the skills to this and even if I had, according to Wiki guidelines I have a Conflict of Interest. Any interested persons could also contact myself for assistance, photos etc. jeandecabalis@aol.com Thank you Wiki Community. Signed Lenny (aka Jean de Cabalis)
I recommend that this page is completely deleted. Jean. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.234.68.164 ( talk) 01:33, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
Sourcing is poor and partly primary; notability looks like an issue. Tacyarg ( talk) 15:07, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Someone seemingly claiming to be Dermot ( User:Yahuel) has added/altered text to the effect that the Sydney Guardians as run by Frater Carfax has no especial claim to being the Society of the Guardians, and that any person can if they so wish call themselves a Guardian. This sounds suspiciously like a continuation of the old arguments between Dermot and Leonard, and this article is not an appropriate war-ground. If there are opposing views to what's published, and they appear in a reliable source, then we can cite them in the article, with attributions to their sources. Otherwise we can't publish them. If anyone feels that the information currently in the article comes from unreliable sources, then we can discuss that too. But I don't want to see this article turn into a battle between unverifiable positions. Fuzzypeg ★ 03:56, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
Good point Fuzzypeg. Seeing the it is okay to claim 6th degree or 666th degree prompted me to added in a few things, which I have provided with references. I.e. Document on the 7 grades of the Guardians by Michael Freedman. So the 666th degree claim by so-called Yahuel is completely wrong and not anything to do with the Guardians. If this or any any other verifiable documents that are useful to you please email me at guild_decabalis@yahoo.com though I send the bulk to Frater Carfax in Australia, I do have a some materials remaining - Jean de Cabalis. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.237.40.79 ( talk) 06:06, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest was declined. The reviewer is requesting that the editor with the conflict of interest describe the proposed the changes on the talk page rather than in e-mail. |
Request for edit from someone in the Wiki community (as this page needs tidying up). I have neither the skills to this and even if I had, according to Wiki guidelines I have a Conflict of Interest. Any interested persons could also contact myself for assistance, photos etc. jeandecabalis@aol.com Thank you Wiki Community. Signed Lenny (aka Jean de Cabalis)
I recommend that this page is completely deleted. Jean. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.234.68.164 ( talk) 01:33, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
Sourcing is poor and partly primary; notability looks like an issue. Tacyarg ( talk) 15:07, 7 March 2022 (UTC)