This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Social Democratic Party of Germany article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 1000 days |
This
level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The fact that one can read the entire lede and the entire "History" section without ever reading that the SPD was Marxist for the first 50 years of its existence, but isn't anymore, begs the question why? Sorry, but the phrase "Marxist-influenced" is actually worse than saying nothing at all, because it is literally meaningless without context. Fucking Christ! 76.69.155.96 ( talk) 01:13, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Is it really necessary to list factions in the infobox? The SPD is a catch-all center-left social-democratic party—of course it will have democratic socialist and centrist factions! In the interest of concision (especially since this is the infobox), I propose that the factions section be removed from the infobox. The references should be used in the article body instead. This same issue applies to the CDU and the CSU. Ezhao02 ( talk) 14:23, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
Shouldn't 1875 (the merger of ADAV and SDAP) be the founding date instead of 1863 (the founding of ADAV), since ADAV is only one of the two predecessor organizations?
178.218.236.111 ( talk) 21:11, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
While the SPD is largely social democratic, there are some factions in the party who support the ideologies of democratic socialism and social liberalism. Should we add it? Like writing "factions"?- Karma1998 ( talk) 11:24, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
(Off-topic) On pro-Europeanism and, thus, Euroscepticism, I hope we will be able achieve a consensus to remove them from all party infoboxes. -- Checco ( talk) 21:04, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Social Democratic Party of Germany article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 1000 days |
This
level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The fact that one can read the entire lede and the entire "History" section without ever reading that the SPD was Marxist for the first 50 years of its existence, but isn't anymore, begs the question why? Sorry, but the phrase "Marxist-influenced" is actually worse than saying nothing at all, because it is literally meaningless without context. Fucking Christ! 76.69.155.96 ( talk) 01:13, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Is it really necessary to list factions in the infobox? The SPD is a catch-all center-left social-democratic party—of course it will have democratic socialist and centrist factions! In the interest of concision (especially since this is the infobox), I propose that the factions section be removed from the infobox. The references should be used in the article body instead. This same issue applies to the CDU and the CSU. Ezhao02 ( talk) 14:23, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
Shouldn't 1875 (the merger of ADAV and SDAP) be the founding date instead of 1863 (the founding of ADAV), since ADAV is only one of the two predecessor organizations?
178.218.236.111 ( talk) 21:11, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
While the SPD is largely social democratic, there are some factions in the party who support the ideologies of democratic socialism and social liberalism. Should we add it? Like writing "factions"?- Karma1998 ( talk) 11:24, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
(Off-topic) On pro-Europeanism and, thus, Euroscepticism, I hope we will be able achieve a consensus to remove them from all party infoboxes. -- Checco ( talk) 21:04, 15 January 2023 (UTC)