This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Snap page. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | Disambiguation | |||
|
Also a dirivative of position. I think the 5th.
—Preceding
unsigned comment added by
ARiina (
talk •
contribs) 22:31, 23 April 2006
I do not believe that all the topics covered in the computing aspect fit to science and engineering -- specifically a search engine would actually fit closer to a product than a science/engineering concept and some people might argue whether a specific protocol is a product or an engineering issue. (ie that protocols in general are computer science/engineering but that a specific protocol might be considered a product to solve a particular system issue.) As a result I think is appropriate to keep the IT and Science aspects more separate. Nashikawa 23:14, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
What about snapping your fingers. Is there no insanely in-depth article on the mechanics of the snap? As far as I know, this is the origin of the word, shouldn't it be mentioned somewhere?
—Preceding
unsigned comment added by
129.171.233.29 (
talk) 17:52, 1 October 2006
Why was
Snap-on , the tool manufacturer removed?
It has an article in Wikipedia...why not reference it here?
—Preceding
unsigned comment added by
192.80.95.243 (
talk) 11:38, 9 August 2007
🙏🏿 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.56.34.119 ( talk) 22:04, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Snap page. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | Disambiguation | |||
|
Also a dirivative of position. I think the 5th.
—Preceding
unsigned comment added by
ARiina (
talk •
contribs) 22:31, 23 April 2006
I do not believe that all the topics covered in the computing aspect fit to science and engineering -- specifically a search engine would actually fit closer to a product than a science/engineering concept and some people might argue whether a specific protocol is a product or an engineering issue. (ie that protocols in general are computer science/engineering but that a specific protocol might be considered a product to solve a particular system issue.) As a result I think is appropriate to keep the IT and Science aspects more separate. Nashikawa 23:14, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
What about snapping your fingers. Is there no insanely in-depth article on the mechanics of the snap? As far as I know, this is the origin of the word, shouldn't it be mentioned somewhere?
—Preceding
unsigned comment added by
129.171.233.29 (
talk) 17:52, 1 October 2006
Why was
Snap-on , the tool manufacturer removed?
It has an article in Wikipedia...why not reference it here?
—Preceding
unsigned comment added by
192.80.95.243 (
talk) 11:38, 9 August 2007
🙏🏿 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.56.34.119 ( talk) 22:04, 27 August 2015 (UTC)