This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all
disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the
project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the
discussion.DisambiguationWikipedia:WikiProject DisambiguationTemplate:WikiProject DisambiguationDisambiguation articles
To my knowledge, Snaggletooth and
Kristen Dunst do have a google image connection, as claimed. The Dunst article doesn't cite to it however. This is unlike, for example,
Santorum (sexual neologism), and
Rick Santorum, which has a similar
Google search engine connection (see
Google bomb) but has an article and some real references. If there were an article, a mention in the existing article, or a reference, then maybe the outcome here on this disambiguation page should be different. 7&6=thirteen (
☎) 20:24, 5 March 2011 (UTC)reply
Unless someone can prove otherwise, I call it public defamation and don't approve. Even if it's true, do casual nicknames belong on disambiguation pages?
Bob the WikipediaN(
talk •
contribs) 02:30, 6 March 2011 (UTC)reply
I don't think it is technically defamatory, i.e.libel,
slander.
libel per se or
slander per se -- I would hasten to add that I have not been retained to render a legal opinion on the subject, so this is worth what you paid for it. However, I would question its encyclopedic
notability; and it really seems like a 'cheap shot' to me. 7&6=thirteen (
☎) 14:28, 6 March 2011 (UTC)reply
This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all
disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the
project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the
discussion.DisambiguationWikipedia:WikiProject DisambiguationTemplate:WikiProject DisambiguationDisambiguation articles
To my knowledge, Snaggletooth and
Kristen Dunst do have a google image connection, as claimed. The Dunst article doesn't cite to it however. This is unlike, for example,
Santorum (sexual neologism), and
Rick Santorum, which has a similar
Google search engine connection (see
Google bomb) but has an article and some real references. If there were an article, a mention in the existing article, or a reference, then maybe the outcome here on this disambiguation page should be different. 7&6=thirteen (
☎) 20:24, 5 March 2011 (UTC)reply
Unless someone can prove otherwise, I call it public defamation and don't approve. Even if it's true, do casual nicknames belong on disambiguation pages?
Bob the WikipediaN(
talk •
contribs) 02:30, 6 March 2011 (UTC)reply
I don't think it is technically defamatory, i.e.libel,
slander.
libel per se or
slander per se -- I would hasten to add that I have not been retained to render a legal opinion on the subject, so this is worth what you paid for it. However, I would question its encyclopedic
notability; and it really seems like a 'cheap shot' to me. 7&6=thirteen (
☎) 14:28, 6 March 2011 (UTC)reply