![]() | Disambiguation | |||
|
![]() | The contents of the Small-l liberal page were merged into Liberalism on February 10, 2010. For the contribution history and old versions of the merged article please see its history. |
I doubt this page will be deleted (it would be interesting to see which of the reasons for deletion on the Wikipedia:Deletion policy this is supposed to come under!) but it would be good to improve the text. Obvious improvements would be to note first and canonical uses of the term. Does anyone have any ideas on these? Pete/Pcb21 (talk) 12:24, 28 Apr 2004 (UTC)
I've added some depth and history, but it needs a lot more work still - AJ
Article listed on Wikipedia:Votes for deletion Apr 28 to May 4 2004, consensus was to keep. Discussion:
End discussion
A small point, I know, but Democratic Reform BC is just not worth mentioning. They have no public profile and got less 1% of the vote in the last election.
I note that this was changed to "BC" a few edits ago [1] but I think it needs to be spelt out in full on first mention, since some people won't know what the abbreviation "BC" means. I know it looks a bit odd having "British Columbia" written out in full twice in the space of five words, but I think it's necessary, just as I'd also write in some circumstances: "In the United Kingdom, the United Kingdom Independence Party..." Loganberry ( Talk) 03:59, 28 September 2005 (UTC)
I was born in Australia & have lived here most of my life & always heard the term on US political tv shows & thought it was a US thing. So I was really surprised to find it here labelled Australian.-- Tyranny Sue ( talk) 00:55, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
![]() | Disambiguation | |||
|
![]() | The contents of the Small-l liberal page were merged into Liberalism on February 10, 2010. For the contribution history and old versions of the merged article please see its history. |
I doubt this page will be deleted (it would be interesting to see which of the reasons for deletion on the Wikipedia:Deletion policy this is supposed to come under!) but it would be good to improve the text. Obvious improvements would be to note first and canonical uses of the term. Does anyone have any ideas on these? Pete/Pcb21 (talk) 12:24, 28 Apr 2004 (UTC)
I've added some depth and history, but it needs a lot more work still - AJ
Article listed on Wikipedia:Votes for deletion Apr 28 to May 4 2004, consensus was to keep. Discussion:
End discussion
A small point, I know, but Democratic Reform BC is just not worth mentioning. They have no public profile and got less 1% of the vote in the last election.
I note that this was changed to "BC" a few edits ago [1] but I think it needs to be spelt out in full on first mention, since some people won't know what the abbreviation "BC" means. I know it looks a bit odd having "British Columbia" written out in full twice in the space of five words, but I think it's necessary, just as I'd also write in some circumstances: "In the United Kingdom, the United Kingdom Independence Party..." Loganberry ( Talk) 03:59, 28 September 2005 (UTC)
I was born in Australia & have lived here most of my life & always heard the term on US political tv shows & thought it was a US thing. So I was really surprised to find it here labelled Australian.-- Tyranny Sue ( talk) 00:55, 5 November 2009 (UTC)