![]() | Disambiguation | |||
|
Why is it there? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.16.160.34 ( talk) 11:23, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
"which is ironic as people with less tissue have less skin" Well, i guess by absolute measure, sure, but not in terms of skin to tissue ratio, which seams more relevant to me. A smaller body naturally has a higher surface area to volume ratio. And is this really actually irony anyway? -- Elgaroo ( talk) 09:44, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
![]() | Disambiguation | |||
|
Why is it there? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.16.160.34 ( talk) 11:23, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
"which is ironic as people with less tissue have less skin" Well, i guess by absolute measure, sure, but not in terms of skin to tissue ratio, which seams more relevant to me. A smaller body naturally has a higher surface area to volume ratio. And is this really actually irony anyway? -- Elgaroo ( talk) 09:44, 19 July 2011 (UTC)