This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Sir Creek article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | Sir Creek was a good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
![]() | A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the "
Did you know?" column on
May 23, 2006. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the disputed
Sir Creek, a
tidal estuary, has prevented India and Pakistan from setting a permanent maritime boundary in the
Arabian Sea? | ||||||||||||
Current status: Former good article nominee |
This article is most probably written by an indian as evident from the biased language in it.
Hi. This is a well-written article but does not qualify yet for Good Article status for the following reasons:
I noticed on your nomination that all reliable sources have been used in the article. Unfortunately, a lack of sources does not enable reviewers to overlook the requirement that Good Articles be "factually accurate and verifiable". If you do choose to search for more sources, due to the controversial nature of the topic, I would highly recommend sourcing the information from outside third party sources (i.e. non-Indian, non-Pakistani sources) so as not to violate WP:NEUTRALITY. This article will fail for now. Please renominate when the concerns above have been addressed. Best, epicAdam ( talk) 19:51, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
Location is Arabian Sea, not Indian Ocean 2409:40C1:3C:89BA:FD26:6F69:E929:D312 ( talk) 06:19, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Sir Creek article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | Sir Creek was a good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
![]() | A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the "
Did you know?" column on
May 23, 2006. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the disputed
Sir Creek, a
tidal estuary, has prevented India and Pakistan from setting a permanent maritime boundary in the
Arabian Sea? | ||||||||||||
Current status: Former good article nominee |
This article is most probably written by an indian as evident from the biased language in it.
Hi. This is a well-written article but does not qualify yet for Good Article status for the following reasons:
I noticed on your nomination that all reliable sources have been used in the article. Unfortunately, a lack of sources does not enable reviewers to overlook the requirement that Good Articles be "factually accurate and verifiable". If you do choose to search for more sources, due to the controversial nature of the topic, I would highly recommend sourcing the information from outside third party sources (i.e. non-Indian, non-Pakistani sources) so as not to violate WP:NEUTRALITY. This article will fail for now. Please renominate when the concerns above have been addressed. Best, epicAdam ( talk) 19:51, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
Location is Arabian Sea, not Indian Ocean 2409:40C1:3C:89BA:FD26:6F69:E929:D312 ( talk) 06:19, 25 January 2024 (UTC)