![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I tend to disagree. Firstly, the video quality of the excerpt is horrendous...even in the small frame that its in. And secondly, the full video should be there simply because of its value - it is the entire video of the subject that the article is focused on. If someone wants to watch it in a bigger frame, they can click on the video's information tab or navigate to youtube themselves. But providing a short (and low-quality at that) excerpt does the film a disservice, in my opinion at least.
Oh, just by the way, the video that is uploaded on Wikipedia is in pretty decent 480p. I'm not sure how that resolution is "small".-- haha169 ( talk) 06:00, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
The new video clip is twice as large as the old one at 6.3MB, and is of considerably better quality. As a comparison, there is also a WebM version at around the same size here.-- ♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 15:19, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
The new Wikipedia video player supports HTML5 and WebM. There is an extract from the film here.-- ♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 18:39, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
So some fans are making a fan game of this film and Blender is going to let these people do so? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.44.144.215 ( talk) 01:40, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
Should we create the Sintel Game a page? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.71.51.195 ( talk) 23:00, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
I saw screen shots of the game,you think you could add them here?— Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.178.176.128 ( talk) 20:07, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
![]() |
An image used in this article,
File:Sintel movie 720x306.ogv, has been nominated for deletion at
Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests March 2012
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Sintel movie 720x306.ogv) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 18:45, 30 March 2012 (UTC) |
This template was recently added to this article, and I'm not really sure why. Sources 2, 3, 4, 5, 13 and 18 are not primary sources, and I think this should be sufficient. Both primary and non-primary sources have their benefits, so a good mixture is always the target, and primary sources are mostly used as references to dates and facts, which is what they are very good at. Therefore my question: What's the reason for this template? -- Julian H. ( talk) 14:12, 30 September 2012 (UTC)
[[wikt:cinder|]]
)
Keφr (
talk)
16:24, 30 September 2012 (UTC)The tone of the article is not blatantly spammy, and Blender should be considered a reliable source for statements about how the film was made. Secondary sources would probably repeat what Blender said. My main concern is the trivia section, which is completely unsourced and should be axed per WP:TRIVIA.-- ♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 06:37, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I tend to disagree. Firstly, the video quality of the excerpt is horrendous...even in the small frame that its in. And secondly, the full video should be there simply because of its value - it is the entire video of the subject that the article is focused on. If someone wants to watch it in a bigger frame, they can click on the video's information tab or navigate to youtube themselves. But providing a short (and low-quality at that) excerpt does the film a disservice, in my opinion at least.
Oh, just by the way, the video that is uploaded on Wikipedia is in pretty decent 480p. I'm not sure how that resolution is "small".-- haha169 ( talk) 06:00, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
The new video clip is twice as large as the old one at 6.3MB, and is of considerably better quality. As a comparison, there is also a WebM version at around the same size here.-- ♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 15:19, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
The new Wikipedia video player supports HTML5 and WebM. There is an extract from the film here.-- ♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 18:39, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
So some fans are making a fan game of this film and Blender is going to let these people do so? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.44.144.215 ( talk) 01:40, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
Should we create the Sintel Game a page? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.71.51.195 ( talk) 23:00, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
I saw screen shots of the game,you think you could add them here?— Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.178.176.128 ( talk) 20:07, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
![]() |
An image used in this article,
File:Sintel movie 720x306.ogv, has been nominated for deletion at
Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests March 2012
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Sintel movie 720x306.ogv) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 18:45, 30 March 2012 (UTC) |
This template was recently added to this article, and I'm not really sure why. Sources 2, 3, 4, 5, 13 and 18 are not primary sources, and I think this should be sufficient. Both primary and non-primary sources have their benefits, so a good mixture is always the target, and primary sources are mostly used as references to dates and facts, which is what they are very good at. Therefore my question: What's the reason for this template? -- Julian H. ( talk) 14:12, 30 September 2012 (UTC)
[[wikt:cinder|]]
)
Keφr (
talk)
16:24, 30 September 2012 (UTC)The tone of the article is not blatantly spammy, and Blender should be considered a reliable source for statements about how the film was made. Secondary sources would probably repeat what Blender said. My main concern is the trivia section, which is completely unsourced and should be axed per WP:TRIVIA.-- ♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 06:37, 1 October 2012 (UTC)