From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

delet this — Preceding unsigned comment added by 47.62.114.203 ( talk) 06:10, 11 June 2016 (UTC) reply

Delete/merge?

  • Since this is not an actual genre, and rather a mashup/remix genre mainly utilising an existing musical genre (vaporwave) and existing Simpsons clips, and it is by definition, a cheap joke, could it be best placed elsewhere? Also, I've noticed a fair few of the citations give no real information other than the fact that Simpsonwave is a thing. Hookorcrook ( talk) 23:10, 14 June 2016 (UTC) reply
  • I dont think so, I think its perfectly fine to leave it as it is as the genre is very much trending. Why not let more people know what it is as the purpose of Wikipedia is? If it dies out, then obviously there would be no reason to keep it. 69.115.151.221 ( talk) 16:56, 19 June 2016 (UTC) reply

I am glad this is on here. I got into chillwave, and wanted to learn more about simpsonswave, visually, it is a different and unique experience — Preceding unsigned comment added by Teschner1997 ( talkcontribs) 06:00, 24 June 2016 (UTC) reply

  • I believe this article should be deleted or merged with vaporwave, as it is the same thing with Simpsons edits that become fleetingly popular for a short amount of time. I feel like this article was written by pseudo-creator Lucien Hughes who just further extended an already made concept, yet is called the 'pioneer' on the page. Regardless, it should be edited to remove the back story about him, as it's irrelevant and out of place in such an article. Kahliimah ( talk) 21:38, 6 September 2016 (UTC) reply
    • After seeing previous attempts to delete this page have failed, I still believe the page should be merged with Vaporwave, however I edited the focus on Lucien Hughes somewhat so that it doesn't feel so out of place, as that's where the majority of criticism is coming from here. Kahliimah ( talk) 21:57, 6 September 2016 (UTC) reply

Page Author

I feel like this article was written by Lucien Hughes, the kid that keeps being mentioned in the article, purely for his own ego. It's a useless page and should probably be deleted

82.4.247.20 ( talk) 13:34, 27 August 2016 (UTC) reply

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

delet this — Preceding unsigned comment added by 47.62.114.203 ( talk) 06:10, 11 June 2016 (UTC) reply

Delete/merge?

  • Since this is not an actual genre, and rather a mashup/remix genre mainly utilising an existing musical genre (vaporwave) and existing Simpsons clips, and it is by definition, a cheap joke, could it be best placed elsewhere? Also, I've noticed a fair few of the citations give no real information other than the fact that Simpsonwave is a thing. Hookorcrook ( talk) 23:10, 14 June 2016 (UTC) reply
  • I dont think so, I think its perfectly fine to leave it as it is as the genre is very much trending. Why not let more people know what it is as the purpose of Wikipedia is? If it dies out, then obviously there would be no reason to keep it. 69.115.151.221 ( talk) 16:56, 19 June 2016 (UTC) reply

I am glad this is on here. I got into chillwave, and wanted to learn more about simpsonswave, visually, it is a different and unique experience — Preceding unsigned comment added by Teschner1997 ( talkcontribs) 06:00, 24 June 2016 (UTC) reply

  • I believe this article should be deleted or merged with vaporwave, as it is the same thing with Simpsons edits that become fleetingly popular for a short amount of time. I feel like this article was written by pseudo-creator Lucien Hughes who just further extended an already made concept, yet is called the 'pioneer' on the page. Regardless, it should be edited to remove the back story about him, as it's irrelevant and out of place in such an article. Kahliimah ( talk) 21:38, 6 September 2016 (UTC) reply
    • After seeing previous attempts to delete this page have failed, I still believe the page should be merged with Vaporwave, however I edited the focus on Lucien Hughes somewhat so that it doesn't feel so out of place, as that's where the majority of criticism is coming from here. Kahliimah ( talk) 21:57, 6 September 2016 (UTC) reply

Page Author

I feel like this article was written by Lucien Hughes, the kid that keeps being mentioned in the article, purely for his own ego. It's a useless page and should probably be deleted

82.4.247.20 ( talk) 13:34, 27 August 2016 (UTC) reply


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook