![]() | Disambiguation | |||
|
This is supposed to be a disambiguation page, so I moved this from article to Talk:
This is already the meaning assigned in sense #1 listed, and defined in signal (information theory), the information above should be merged to that article. -- Lexor 12:03, 3 Nov 2003 (UTC)
Smack discussed a recent edit to this page in a comment on Wikipedia:Reference desk#Microeconomics question:
I've removed the following text from Signal, for ignorance of what else to do with it.
First I wanted to create a page entitled signal (cards), then I realized that it's more general than that, and signal (games) would be more appropriate, and then I decided that it relates somehow to signaling (economics). Could some economist figure out a way to work this in? -- Smack ( talk) 04:53, 10 May 2005 (UTC)
I've come across two forms of spelling of the word "signalling" and "signaling". Its causing me headaches when trying to link to other pages! Wiktionary reckons it should have 2 ll's - so do I. Its probably a fair bit of housekeeping, but would be worthwhile standardising on one of these formats (I propose 2 ll's) and updating the pages/content/links to match.
Right now Signals is about an obscure band and Signals (album) by Rush isn't here on the disambig. The Rush album is certainly more notable than the band. If Signal is going to be a disambig that includes some plurals then "Signals" should redirect here instead of returning some little band's vanity page. I may make these changes myself. Discuss if you agree, disagree or have other ideas. -- Howdybob 13:32, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
This page is a disambiguation page, intended to distinguish things that might be described simply as signal or signalling; it is not intended to be an index of all terms which merely include the word signal (such as signal to noise ratio). See MOS:DABENTRY and WP:PTM for detailed guidance. Also there is some duplication: signal (circuit theory) and signal (electrical engineering) have the same target page. -- catslash ( talk) 15:24, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
I had made an edit or two before noticing the recent inflationary period. So instead I just took it back to before the Brews additions. I'm sure there are a few good things in there, and he can try again after reviewing MOS:DAB. Dicklyon ( talk) 17:15, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
If we order by alphabet (ie randomly) importannt articles get buried under unimportant ones, hence my putting the science articles first, generally more important than communication and music. Names should go below other themes. I couldntnfind an important article, buried under a load of less important articles. ♫ SqueakBox talk contribs 15:42, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
![]() | Disambiguation | |||
|
This is supposed to be a disambiguation page, so I moved this from article to Talk:
This is already the meaning assigned in sense #1 listed, and defined in signal (information theory), the information above should be merged to that article. -- Lexor 12:03, 3 Nov 2003 (UTC)
Smack discussed a recent edit to this page in a comment on Wikipedia:Reference desk#Microeconomics question:
I've removed the following text from Signal, for ignorance of what else to do with it.
First I wanted to create a page entitled signal (cards), then I realized that it's more general than that, and signal (games) would be more appropriate, and then I decided that it relates somehow to signaling (economics). Could some economist figure out a way to work this in? -- Smack ( talk) 04:53, 10 May 2005 (UTC)
I've come across two forms of spelling of the word "signalling" and "signaling". Its causing me headaches when trying to link to other pages! Wiktionary reckons it should have 2 ll's - so do I. Its probably a fair bit of housekeeping, but would be worthwhile standardising on one of these formats (I propose 2 ll's) and updating the pages/content/links to match.
Right now Signals is about an obscure band and Signals (album) by Rush isn't here on the disambig. The Rush album is certainly more notable than the band. If Signal is going to be a disambig that includes some plurals then "Signals" should redirect here instead of returning some little band's vanity page. I may make these changes myself. Discuss if you agree, disagree or have other ideas. -- Howdybob 13:32, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
This page is a disambiguation page, intended to distinguish things that might be described simply as signal or signalling; it is not intended to be an index of all terms which merely include the word signal (such as signal to noise ratio). See MOS:DABENTRY and WP:PTM for detailed guidance. Also there is some duplication: signal (circuit theory) and signal (electrical engineering) have the same target page. -- catslash ( talk) 15:24, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
I had made an edit or two before noticing the recent inflationary period. So instead I just took it back to before the Brews additions. I'm sure there are a few good things in there, and he can try again after reviewing MOS:DAB. Dicklyon ( talk) 17:15, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
If we order by alphabet (ie randomly) importannt articles get buried under unimportant ones, hence my putting the science articles first, generally more important than communication and music. Names should go below other themes. I couldntnfind an important article, buried under a load of less important articles. ♫ SqueakBox talk contribs 15:42, 19 August 2015 (UTC)