This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article said that Webb was elected as MP for Seaham at the 1923 general election. However, a Google search throws up conflicting results:
For now, I have taken the Concise Britannica as the most reputable of these sources, and edited the article to say 1922, but has anyone got a more definitive reference? -- BrownHairedGirl (talk) • ( contribs) 18:08, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
It might be worth mentioning that the Webbs are seen by Trotsky as a canonical example of well-meaning but confused pro-Soviet foreigners— their works get attacked frequently in The Revolution Betrayed in particular. -- Delirium 05:03, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
As you know, the very citation that follows the above statement speaks for itself: I DID site that information, it's in the same book as the citation link (ref: the very citation link you'd have to be blind not to see). Stop vandalizing this article because you want to marry Stalin, thanks.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.79.124.223 ( talk) 18:15, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
THE GREAT TERROR is the reference genius. It's in the SAME BOOK as the citing link indicates.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.79.124.223 ( talk) 18:28, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
I think this article should be substantially enlarged, to better account for Webb's political thought. As it stands, the focus of the article bears the mark of having been targeted by a right-wing smearing campaign, which is also suggested by the comments just above me. This is not to say that Webb's highly unfortunate Soviet sympathies should not be mentioned, but that they should be integrated into a more rounded, complete image of his life and thoughts. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 210.55.83.42 ( talk) 10:44, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Sidney Webb, 1st Baron Passfield. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 18:02, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
How come such an important historical figure has so few words written about him? Clearly, the amount of references and links in the article are at odds with the brevity of the content.
Is it because he had a lot of controversial opinions, such as supporting the soviet union, eugenics, and adopting the racist view that there was an "adverse selection" going on? Such as this quote demonstrates:
“Twenty-five percent of our parents, as Professor Karl Pearson keeps warning us, is producing 50 percent of the next generation. This can hardly result in anything but national deterioration; or, as an alternative, in this country gradually falling to the Irish and the Jews.”
Cited from: Webb, Sidney. 1907. “The Decline in the Birth-Rate.” Fabian Society Tract 131. London: The Fabian Society.
Be that as it may, I think it is important to expand the content. Both the good and the bad. I propose this quote to be one of the additions to the article.
2804:14D:4CA4:970D:C4EF:5461:C0C2:129 ( talk) 17:15, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
He was called to the bar in 1885. Why was he still working as a clerk until 1892, when he was able to give up the day-job on his marriage to Beatrice? Could we have some detail? Valetude ( talk) 13:00, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
I'm curious why Webb was granted a peerage at what seems like a very early stage of his political career. He had been an MP for only 7 years, during which time he was President of the Board of Trade for less than a year. He had only just been appointed Secretary of State for Dominion Affairs and the Colonies for two weeks when he was "kicked upstairs", and without even the usual knighthood in-between. Others have to put in 40 years of service before their gong arrives. Why was he ennobled so early? -- Jack of Oz [pleasantries] 16:08, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article said that Webb was elected as MP for Seaham at the 1923 general election. However, a Google search throws up conflicting results:
For now, I have taken the Concise Britannica as the most reputable of these sources, and edited the article to say 1922, but has anyone got a more definitive reference? -- BrownHairedGirl (talk) • ( contribs) 18:08, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
It might be worth mentioning that the Webbs are seen by Trotsky as a canonical example of well-meaning but confused pro-Soviet foreigners— their works get attacked frequently in The Revolution Betrayed in particular. -- Delirium 05:03, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
As you know, the very citation that follows the above statement speaks for itself: I DID site that information, it's in the same book as the citation link (ref: the very citation link you'd have to be blind not to see). Stop vandalizing this article because you want to marry Stalin, thanks.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.79.124.223 ( talk) 18:15, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
THE GREAT TERROR is the reference genius. It's in the SAME BOOK as the citing link indicates.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.79.124.223 ( talk) 18:28, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
I think this article should be substantially enlarged, to better account for Webb's political thought. As it stands, the focus of the article bears the mark of having been targeted by a right-wing smearing campaign, which is also suggested by the comments just above me. This is not to say that Webb's highly unfortunate Soviet sympathies should not be mentioned, but that they should be integrated into a more rounded, complete image of his life and thoughts. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 210.55.83.42 ( talk) 10:44, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Sidney Webb, 1st Baron Passfield. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 18:02, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
How come such an important historical figure has so few words written about him? Clearly, the amount of references and links in the article are at odds with the brevity of the content.
Is it because he had a lot of controversial opinions, such as supporting the soviet union, eugenics, and adopting the racist view that there was an "adverse selection" going on? Such as this quote demonstrates:
“Twenty-five percent of our parents, as Professor Karl Pearson keeps warning us, is producing 50 percent of the next generation. This can hardly result in anything but national deterioration; or, as an alternative, in this country gradually falling to the Irish and the Jews.”
Cited from: Webb, Sidney. 1907. “The Decline in the Birth-Rate.” Fabian Society Tract 131. London: The Fabian Society.
Be that as it may, I think it is important to expand the content. Both the good and the bad. I propose this quote to be one of the additions to the article.
2804:14D:4CA4:970D:C4EF:5461:C0C2:129 ( talk) 17:15, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
He was called to the bar in 1885. Why was he still working as a clerk until 1892, when he was able to give up the day-job on his marriage to Beatrice? Could we have some detail? Valetude ( talk) 13:00, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
I'm curious why Webb was granted a peerage at what seems like a very early stage of his political career. He had been an MP for only 7 years, during which time he was President of the Board of Trade for less than a year. He had only just been appointed Secretary of State for Dominion Affairs and the Colonies for two weeks when he was "kicked upstairs", and without even the usual knighthood in-between. Others have to put in 40 years of service before their gong arrives. Why was he ennobled so early? -- Jack of Oz [pleasantries] 16:08, 30 March 2023 (UTC)