This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chess, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Chess on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChessWikipedia:WikiProject ChessTemplate:WikiProject Chesschess articles
I don't really see any drawback to keeping it. (Schiller gives over three pages to it.) What is hurt by keeping this article? (The opening isn't refuted, and notable GMs have adopted it.) Is this a "policy" thing? (And if so, for what good aim? Not to mention consistency issues, which are always negated arbitrarily with WP:OTHER STUFF argument. Consistency is a protection against biased enforcement of policy. WP:OTHER STUFF is often use for a POV agenda.) What is really wanted here!?
Ihardlythinkso (
talk)
12:18, 30 October 2013 (UTC)reply
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chess, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Chess on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChessWikipedia:WikiProject ChessTemplate:WikiProject Chesschess articles
I don't really see any drawback to keeping it. (Schiller gives over three pages to it.) What is hurt by keeping this article? (The opening isn't refuted, and notable GMs have adopted it.) Is this a "policy" thing? (And if so, for what good aim? Not to mention consistency issues, which are always negated arbitrarily with WP:OTHER STUFF argument. Consistency is a protection against biased enforcement of policy. WP:OTHER STUFF is often use for a POV agenda.) What is really wanted here!?
Ihardlythinkso (
talk)
12:18, 30 October 2013 (UTC)reply