This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all
disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the
project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the
discussion.DisambiguationWikipedia:WikiProject DisambiguationTemplate:WikiProject DisambiguationDisambiguation articles
This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LanguagesWikipedia:WikiProject LanguagesTemplate:WikiProject Languageslanguage articles
This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a
WikiProject dedicated to coverage of
Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the
project page, or contribute to the
project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
Potential
Is "disambiguation with possibilities" a thing? This article could likely be expanded to a more general overview of the pre-Russian linguistic groups of the Siberia and their common history (along the lines of
Native American languages). --
Trɔpʏliʊm •
blah 15:58, 10 August 2014 (UTC)reply
The 'Paleosiperian' concept attempts to capture a much earlier point in history. It explicitly excludes plenty of languages that are unquestionably indigenous to the region such as
Samoyedic,
Siberian Turkic,
Tungusic (even if they may have developed from proto-languages that arrived in the region "only" some 2000-4000 years ago). The ethnolinguistic history of the region in recent millennia would have to accommodate these groups as well.
'Paleosiberian' allegedly would be the languages spoken in Siberia before the introduction of languages of the "Ural-Altaic typology". Though there is no uniquely defined "Ural-Altaic" typology. E.g. Fortescue has argued instead for distinguishing a "
Uralo-Siberian typology; Stefan Georg and Gregory Anderson have similarly argued for typological features common to larger units of Siberian languages yet. These also seem like topics that might be well discussed in a single place. --
Trɔpʏliʊm •
blah 16:00, 11 August 2014 (UTC)reply
Siberian conlang
A few years ago, i.i.r.c., there was a fairly well developed Siberian Wikipedia, written in what seems to be a
Slavic conlang or maybe just a relexification of Russian. It was later shut down — was it a LARP prank, a hoax with political motivation…? Is it noteworthy? (See also
this.)
Tuvalkin (
talk) 11:06, 26 November 2022 (UTC)reply
This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all
disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the
project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the
discussion.DisambiguationWikipedia:WikiProject DisambiguationTemplate:WikiProject DisambiguationDisambiguation articles
This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LanguagesWikipedia:WikiProject LanguagesTemplate:WikiProject Languageslanguage articles
This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a
WikiProject dedicated to coverage of
Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the
project page, or contribute to the
project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
Potential
Is "disambiguation with possibilities" a thing? This article could likely be expanded to a more general overview of the pre-Russian linguistic groups of the Siberia and their common history (along the lines of
Native American languages). --
Trɔpʏliʊm •
blah 15:58, 10 August 2014 (UTC)reply
The 'Paleosiperian' concept attempts to capture a much earlier point in history. It explicitly excludes plenty of languages that are unquestionably indigenous to the region such as
Samoyedic,
Siberian Turkic,
Tungusic (even if they may have developed from proto-languages that arrived in the region "only" some 2000-4000 years ago). The ethnolinguistic history of the region in recent millennia would have to accommodate these groups as well.
'Paleosiberian' allegedly would be the languages spoken in Siberia before the introduction of languages of the "Ural-Altaic typology". Though there is no uniquely defined "Ural-Altaic" typology. E.g. Fortescue has argued instead for distinguishing a "
Uralo-Siberian typology; Stefan Georg and Gregory Anderson have similarly argued for typological features common to larger units of Siberian languages yet. These also seem like topics that might be well discussed in a single place. --
Trɔpʏliʊm •
blah 16:00, 11 August 2014 (UTC)reply
Siberian conlang
A few years ago, i.i.r.c., there was a fairly well developed Siberian Wikipedia, written in what seems to be a
Slavic conlang or maybe just a relexification of Russian. It was later shut down — was it a LARP prank, a hoax with political motivation…? Is it noteworthy? (See also
this.)
Tuvalkin (
talk) 11:06, 26 November 2022 (UTC)reply