![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 |
Because Rydia was chemicalling I fixed this from the copyvio it was and made it into life, citing the copyvioed page as a reference. gren グレン 03:03, 4 October 2005 (UTC)
National award announced just now is not for 2009 , it is for 2008. Isnt it?
The article spells her last name as Ghosal123, but its more commonly spelled as Ghoshal:
Almost all song credits also spell it with the h. So, I think the article should be moved to Shreya Ghoshal -- soum talk 14:19, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
Surely there isn't a need to have her name spelt in 'every' Indian language either - Bangla and Hindi should suffice.
The article contains many PoV phrases and Weasel words, some of which I am pointing out:
I still maintain, a near-complete rewrite would be the way to go. -- soum talk 14:38, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
Agree big time with User:Soumyasch. This article needs a complete rewrite. Anyone up for it? Barathvk 00:15, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
Agreed, a lot of NPOV and weasel wording. Supertigerman ( talk) 05:49, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
This article has been renamed from Shreya Ghosal to Shreya Ghoshal as the result of a move request. -- Stemonitis 13:42, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
I suggest the awards list to be arranged in some standard orders, preferrabily in alphabetic order. Currently it has been arranged in a random order or according to some editors's wish. Filmfare has no special importance in comparison with IIFA or Zee Cine awards. If the most important awards are listed ahead, then State Film Awards should have priority after National Awards as they both are the government awards. The rest including Filmfare are just popular awards. -- Arfaz ( talk) 21:21, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
Not a good idea. The article is only filled up by the awards. If we move that to a new page, the main article would become too small. — Vensatry (Ping me) 15:13, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
Note about Awards
I made a few edits to the page which were reverted by User:Justice007 saying the edits fall under WP:I don't like it. I believe my edits were constructive and followed the Wikipedia policies. I added some details about the awards she has received and about her discography and replaced an image (which is now deleted from Commons) with another Free Image. Will this come under WP:I don't like it? Also news articles are not supposed to be listed in the External links, but rather be used as references. So a link from radioandmusic.com (the site itself cannot be considered reliable) was removed. Also, a link from IBN Live was moved to the References section while two dead links from Times of India were removed. Will any of these fall under WP:I don't like it? 112.79.41.202 ( talk) 13:10, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
user:vensatry believe that any image, like this File:Shreya ghoshal song saali khushi.jpg, which has high resolution or fat size is good image and want it for infobox. Unfortunately fat size is criteria for 'most valued image' on Commons and many bad images are promoted ONLY because of this criteria. User is trying to link such image which is 'promoted' by only one user on Commons.
It is not that I want 'my image' in infobox. But unfortunately almost nobody takes efforts to search good images on bollywoodhungama. BH search criteria is tricky and it takes hours-days to find good image. Some users just upload whatever they see and want that image in infobox. If other users are supporting image of user:vensatry, I have no objection. neo ( talk) 07:27, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
I think 500K bytes is way too much; pretty sure there are guidelines on picture file size. Even this one File:Shreya Ghoshal 1.jpg may or may not be too big, but I think it is the best picture of her on commons, from a beauty standpoint. BollyJeff | talk 13:35, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Jaguar ( talk · contribs) 09:22, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
I'll have this to you soon
JAG
UAR
09:22, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
Well, it does have a good context, but still needs to be shaped in more accurate format. Derevation Give Me Five 05:54, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
@ Jaguar:, I think i have resolved all comment of yours. Yashthepunisher ( talk) 13:05, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
Sorry for the late review, I admit I've had to rush this as I'm meant to be going out within a few minutes as I type this, but once all of the above are addressed then this should be good to go. It is comprehensive and well written, but I did notice that there one section has a long list of people which should really be altered. Other than that, nice work with this!
JAG
UAR
15:23, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
I don't know why Zafar24 thought it necessary to create Shreya Ghoshal on Forbes, but it's simply not a useful article. The bulk of it could be summarized in one sentence at Shreya Ghoshal, "Ghoshal has made Forbes Celebrity 100 list four times, placing 42nd in both 2012 and 2013, placing 28th in 2014, and 33rd in 2015. Why do we need a unique article for this, and what is the precedent for tracking a person's appearances in a single magazine list? Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 23:28, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
|salary=
parameter?
Cyphoidbomb (
talk)
18:43, 26 April 2016 (UTC)Yashthepunisher, Hi dear, the name of "Sonu Nigam" comes "5 times" in "Shreya Ghoshal" page but what is important is that when to add link of Sonu Nigam. So the best place at the beginning of the article and Shreya Ghoshal's popularity section. You know the reason to add link in the beginning of the article BUT in popularity section because people will likely to hit that link and "curious to know (and they will likely wants to read more) about the people who said great things about Shreya Ghoshal", and it is better, people see their names written in blue ink in popularity of Shreya Ghoshal. So now Link of Sonu Nigam just comes in 2 times. Zafar24 Talk 22:07, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
This is helpful link because people will likely to hit that link and curious to know (and they will likely wants to read more) about the people who said great things about Shreya Ghoshal. And that link comes just second time not hundred times. Zafar24 Talk 05:48, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
Giving Sonu Nigam link in early life section is not so important, so Wikipedia policy says that link is allowed once, then popularity section is important for Sonu Nigam link. Zafar24 Talk 19:46, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
@ Yashthepunisher:, It seems that deleting Sonu Nigam link giving more importants to other two. So there should be two ways to solve this dispute. 1. Keeping all three links. 2. Deleting all three links.
![]() | This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
Shreya Ghoshal did ad for Pakistani milk brand Tarang. She sung a song in that ad. Please can someone find me good reference for that. Zafar24 Talk 22:39, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
I found a video on YouTube but it is not reliable reference and I also did Google Search, so far, not found any reliable reference . Zafar24 Talk 01:24, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
What has happened to the editors of this page ? It is a good article. Yet the "Music career" section of this article is incomplete. It mentions about the songs recorded by Shreya Ghoshal until 2013 (even excluding many notable songs she sung during this time) and doesn't mention anything about the songs recorded by her thereafter. See the article of Sunidhi Chauhan; of course it is exaggerated but it is perfectly updated. Shreya is a far more successful and acclaimed singer, her article must be better than that of Sunidhi. Please help in updating this section. Vibhss ( talk) 17:07, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Shreya Ghoshal/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
The article almost entirely lacks any focus on her Bolywood playback career. Plus, it is mostly sometimes-pointless lists. No significant references. PoV. Though the information here is meaningful and should not be removed (which prompted me to give a Start rating), the tone is not at all suitable. A major shakeup is needed. The article holds much potential. -- soum talk 14:25, 20 March 2007 (UTC) |
Substituted at 21:58, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
Dear @ Suvajit Das: Please see reference link: http://www.allmusic.com/album/release/balgopalancha-ganapati-mr0003111977 the song, "Ganaraj Rangi Nachato" you are talking about was released in 2008. Ghoshal active year is 1998 and reference is present in article. Zafar24 Talk 09:21, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
![]() | This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
Can we right T-Series in infobox of Shreya Ghoshal? Because she did the Mixtape in T-Series where she performed in two songs. Zafar24 Talk 19:31, 22 August 2017 (UTC)
Please take some time and read this article it fails Neutral point of view and has a lot of bias in writing, was really surprised to see this fansite been listed as good article, No offence to any major contributor i respect their work, but still couldn't digest the fact that this article is listed as good article Anoptimistix "Message Me" 08:40, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
Comment. @ Anoptimistix: I am one of the major contributor of this page. The section that you have pointed out as "fansite" was probably not that exaggeratedly written when it was passed two years ago. I was not active on WP for nearly a year when it was, and still is, extensively edited by User:Zafar24 who has been adding a lot of non-POV, fanboy fluffs into the article. I will try to give this article an overall copyedit. Yashthepunisher ( talk) 14:54, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
Comment : Yashthepunisher; Thank you Brother for all your hardwork done till now. I myself admire a lot of musicians and also acknowledge Ghoshal's contributions to the Indian music. Yes, I understand as a significant contributor you have worked very hard on this so I am Withdrawing this reassessment request as you have almost fixed this one. Anoptimistix ( talk) 05:59, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
Ok I agree that some of the edits was not suitable. But @ Yashthepunisher: you removel all content in Legacy Section which was not right. Zafar24 Talk 18:45, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
@ Yashthepunisher: Please tell me that adding Legacy section is a fanboy stuff? Zafar24 Talk 13:48, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
@ Yashthepunisher: Okay I understood my edits on pregnancy rumors or gossipy. Zafar24 Talk 14:00, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
@ Yashthepunisher: Even Mohammed Rafi have a Legacy section. Zafar24 Talk 14:04, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
Hi dear @ Yashthepunisher: You said,"... we all should work towards improving articles without showcasing our ego's". I always believe in talk and I am always ready to talk. I added Sub-section in the popularity section because you said that information on that section is small. Zafar24 Talk 06:42, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 10 external links on Shreya Ghoshal. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 04:33, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
Became first female singer to be given an honour of Sumit 5103 ( talk) 12:12, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. Community Tech bot ( talk) 21:51, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 |
Because Rydia was chemicalling I fixed this from the copyvio it was and made it into life, citing the copyvioed page as a reference. gren グレン 03:03, 4 October 2005 (UTC)
National award announced just now is not for 2009 , it is for 2008. Isnt it?
The article spells her last name as Ghosal123, but its more commonly spelled as Ghoshal:
Almost all song credits also spell it with the h. So, I think the article should be moved to Shreya Ghoshal -- soum talk 14:19, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
Surely there isn't a need to have her name spelt in 'every' Indian language either - Bangla and Hindi should suffice.
The article contains many PoV phrases and Weasel words, some of which I am pointing out:
I still maintain, a near-complete rewrite would be the way to go. -- soum talk 14:38, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
Agree big time with User:Soumyasch. This article needs a complete rewrite. Anyone up for it? Barathvk 00:15, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
Agreed, a lot of NPOV and weasel wording. Supertigerman ( talk) 05:49, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
This article has been renamed from Shreya Ghosal to Shreya Ghoshal as the result of a move request. -- Stemonitis 13:42, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
I suggest the awards list to be arranged in some standard orders, preferrabily in alphabetic order. Currently it has been arranged in a random order or according to some editors's wish. Filmfare has no special importance in comparison with IIFA or Zee Cine awards. If the most important awards are listed ahead, then State Film Awards should have priority after National Awards as they both are the government awards. The rest including Filmfare are just popular awards. -- Arfaz ( talk) 21:21, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
Not a good idea. The article is only filled up by the awards. If we move that to a new page, the main article would become too small. — Vensatry (Ping me) 15:13, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
Note about Awards
I made a few edits to the page which were reverted by User:Justice007 saying the edits fall under WP:I don't like it. I believe my edits were constructive and followed the Wikipedia policies. I added some details about the awards she has received and about her discography and replaced an image (which is now deleted from Commons) with another Free Image. Will this come under WP:I don't like it? Also news articles are not supposed to be listed in the External links, but rather be used as references. So a link from radioandmusic.com (the site itself cannot be considered reliable) was removed. Also, a link from IBN Live was moved to the References section while two dead links from Times of India were removed. Will any of these fall under WP:I don't like it? 112.79.41.202 ( talk) 13:10, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
user:vensatry believe that any image, like this File:Shreya ghoshal song saali khushi.jpg, which has high resolution or fat size is good image and want it for infobox. Unfortunately fat size is criteria for 'most valued image' on Commons and many bad images are promoted ONLY because of this criteria. User is trying to link such image which is 'promoted' by only one user on Commons.
It is not that I want 'my image' in infobox. But unfortunately almost nobody takes efforts to search good images on bollywoodhungama. BH search criteria is tricky and it takes hours-days to find good image. Some users just upload whatever they see and want that image in infobox. If other users are supporting image of user:vensatry, I have no objection. neo ( talk) 07:27, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
I think 500K bytes is way too much; pretty sure there are guidelines on picture file size. Even this one File:Shreya Ghoshal 1.jpg may or may not be too big, but I think it is the best picture of her on commons, from a beauty standpoint. BollyJeff | talk 13:35, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Jaguar ( talk · contribs) 09:22, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
I'll have this to you soon
JAG
UAR
09:22, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
Well, it does have a good context, but still needs to be shaped in more accurate format. Derevation Give Me Five 05:54, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
@ Jaguar:, I think i have resolved all comment of yours. Yashthepunisher ( talk) 13:05, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
Sorry for the late review, I admit I've had to rush this as I'm meant to be going out within a few minutes as I type this, but once all of the above are addressed then this should be good to go. It is comprehensive and well written, but I did notice that there one section has a long list of people which should really be altered. Other than that, nice work with this!
JAG
UAR
15:23, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
I don't know why Zafar24 thought it necessary to create Shreya Ghoshal on Forbes, but it's simply not a useful article. The bulk of it could be summarized in one sentence at Shreya Ghoshal, "Ghoshal has made Forbes Celebrity 100 list four times, placing 42nd in both 2012 and 2013, placing 28th in 2014, and 33rd in 2015. Why do we need a unique article for this, and what is the precedent for tracking a person's appearances in a single magazine list? Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 23:28, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
|salary=
parameter?
Cyphoidbomb (
talk)
18:43, 26 April 2016 (UTC)Yashthepunisher, Hi dear, the name of "Sonu Nigam" comes "5 times" in "Shreya Ghoshal" page but what is important is that when to add link of Sonu Nigam. So the best place at the beginning of the article and Shreya Ghoshal's popularity section. You know the reason to add link in the beginning of the article BUT in popularity section because people will likely to hit that link and "curious to know (and they will likely wants to read more) about the people who said great things about Shreya Ghoshal", and it is better, people see their names written in blue ink in popularity of Shreya Ghoshal. So now Link of Sonu Nigam just comes in 2 times. Zafar24 Talk 22:07, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
This is helpful link because people will likely to hit that link and curious to know (and they will likely wants to read more) about the people who said great things about Shreya Ghoshal. And that link comes just second time not hundred times. Zafar24 Talk 05:48, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
Giving Sonu Nigam link in early life section is not so important, so Wikipedia policy says that link is allowed once, then popularity section is important for Sonu Nigam link. Zafar24 Talk 19:46, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
@ Yashthepunisher:, It seems that deleting Sonu Nigam link giving more importants to other two. So there should be two ways to solve this dispute. 1. Keeping all three links. 2. Deleting all three links.
![]() | This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
Shreya Ghoshal did ad for Pakistani milk brand Tarang. She sung a song in that ad. Please can someone find me good reference for that. Zafar24 Talk 22:39, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
I found a video on YouTube but it is not reliable reference and I also did Google Search, so far, not found any reliable reference . Zafar24 Talk 01:24, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
What has happened to the editors of this page ? It is a good article. Yet the "Music career" section of this article is incomplete. It mentions about the songs recorded by Shreya Ghoshal until 2013 (even excluding many notable songs she sung during this time) and doesn't mention anything about the songs recorded by her thereafter. See the article of Sunidhi Chauhan; of course it is exaggerated but it is perfectly updated. Shreya is a far more successful and acclaimed singer, her article must be better than that of Sunidhi. Please help in updating this section. Vibhss ( talk) 17:07, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Shreya Ghoshal/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
The article almost entirely lacks any focus on her Bolywood playback career. Plus, it is mostly sometimes-pointless lists. No significant references. PoV. Though the information here is meaningful and should not be removed (which prompted me to give a Start rating), the tone is not at all suitable. A major shakeup is needed. The article holds much potential. -- soum talk 14:25, 20 March 2007 (UTC) |
Substituted at 21:58, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
Dear @ Suvajit Das: Please see reference link: http://www.allmusic.com/album/release/balgopalancha-ganapati-mr0003111977 the song, "Ganaraj Rangi Nachato" you are talking about was released in 2008. Ghoshal active year is 1998 and reference is present in article. Zafar24 Talk 09:21, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
![]() | This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
Can we right T-Series in infobox of Shreya Ghoshal? Because she did the Mixtape in T-Series where she performed in two songs. Zafar24 Talk 19:31, 22 August 2017 (UTC)
Please take some time and read this article it fails Neutral point of view and has a lot of bias in writing, was really surprised to see this fansite been listed as good article, No offence to any major contributor i respect their work, but still couldn't digest the fact that this article is listed as good article Anoptimistix "Message Me" 08:40, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
Comment. @ Anoptimistix: I am one of the major contributor of this page. The section that you have pointed out as "fansite" was probably not that exaggeratedly written when it was passed two years ago. I was not active on WP for nearly a year when it was, and still is, extensively edited by User:Zafar24 who has been adding a lot of non-POV, fanboy fluffs into the article. I will try to give this article an overall copyedit. Yashthepunisher ( talk) 14:54, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
Comment : Yashthepunisher; Thank you Brother for all your hardwork done till now. I myself admire a lot of musicians and also acknowledge Ghoshal's contributions to the Indian music. Yes, I understand as a significant contributor you have worked very hard on this so I am Withdrawing this reassessment request as you have almost fixed this one. Anoptimistix ( talk) 05:59, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
Ok I agree that some of the edits was not suitable. But @ Yashthepunisher: you removel all content in Legacy Section which was not right. Zafar24 Talk 18:45, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
@ Yashthepunisher: Please tell me that adding Legacy section is a fanboy stuff? Zafar24 Talk 13:48, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
@ Yashthepunisher: Okay I understood my edits on pregnancy rumors or gossipy. Zafar24 Talk 14:00, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
@ Yashthepunisher: Even Mohammed Rafi have a Legacy section. Zafar24 Talk 14:04, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
Hi dear @ Yashthepunisher: You said,"... we all should work towards improving articles without showcasing our ego's". I always believe in talk and I am always ready to talk. I added Sub-section in the popularity section because you said that information on that section is small. Zafar24 Talk 06:42, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 10 external links on Shreya Ghoshal. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 04:33, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
Became first female singer to be given an honour of Sumit 5103 ( talk) 12:12, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. Community Tech bot ( talk) 21:51, 21 June 2018 (UTC)