This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Shinola article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives:
Index,
1Auto-archiving period: 90 days
![]() |
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | On 13 May 2018, it was proposed that this article be moved from Shinola (shoe polish) to Shinola. The result of the discussion was moved. |
Perhaps you should just accept that things are not significant to mention in Wikipedia merely because you want them to be. The topic has been discussed, and the kind of reflexive inclusion policy that you are trying to push here was soundly defeated. If you think you can overturn that through the appropriate channels, have a go at it, but you cannot declare this article exempt from the consensus. 24.7.14.87 ( talk) 20:30, 26 December 2016 (UTC)
A move discussion is taking place at Talk:Shinola#Requested move 13 May 2018 which may impact this article. -- Netoholic @ 22:29, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: Not moved. No consensus for this move. The original brand, though defunct, is considered, by those who know shit from Shinola, the primary topic by virtue of long-term significance. ( non-admin closure) В²C ☎ 19:22, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
– The defunct shoe polish brand simply isn't the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. It gets fewer views than the modern Shinola (retail company) [1] - which produces a Shinola shoe polish. It appears that many readers are being misdirected to this article when they're really looking for the modern company. Cúchullain t/ c 16:55, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
This self-published blog by a marketing agency adds nothing useful to the article IMO. It's equal parts self-promotion and advertising for the modern retail brand. We already mention the modern brand under § History. -- Sangdeboeuf ( talk) 19:28, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Shinola article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives:
Index,
1Auto-archiving period: 90 days
![]() |
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | On 13 May 2018, it was proposed that this article be moved from Shinola (shoe polish) to Shinola. The result of the discussion was moved. |
Perhaps you should just accept that things are not significant to mention in Wikipedia merely because you want them to be. The topic has been discussed, and the kind of reflexive inclusion policy that you are trying to push here was soundly defeated. If you think you can overturn that through the appropriate channels, have a go at it, but you cannot declare this article exempt from the consensus. 24.7.14.87 ( talk) 20:30, 26 December 2016 (UTC)
A move discussion is taking place at Talk:Shinola#Requested move 13 May 2018 which may impact this article. -- Netoholic @ 22:29, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: Not moved. No consensus for this move. The original brand, though defunct, is considered, by those who know shit from Shinola, the primary topic by virtue of long-term significance. ( non-admin closure) В²C ☎ 19:22, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
– The defunct shoe polish brand simply isn't the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. It gets fewer views than the modern Shinola (retail company) [1] - which produces a Shinola shoe polish. It appears that many readers are being misdirected to this article when they're really looking for the modern company. Cúchullain t/ c 16:55, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
This self-published blog by a marketing agency adds nothing useful to the article IMO. It's equal parts self-promotion and advertising for the modern retail brand. We already mention the modern brand under § History. -- Sangdeboeuf ( talk) 19:28, 31 May 2021 (UTC)