This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Sheryl Sandberg article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 90 days |
Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This
level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This talk page has been
mentioned by a media organization:
|
The
Wikimedia Foundation's
Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see
WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see
WP:COIRESPONSE.
|
It may be worth adding a bit to the controversies section on Facebook's controversial human experimentation, and how Sandberg has expressed regret. See for example, this article in the Washington post and this related article on whether or not this was unethical. That said, I don't think those two citations are sufficient, and I'm not clear on Sandberg's level of responsibility for this human experimentation, though she is Facebook's Chief Operating Officer. And it's certainly an open question as to how unethical it was; it'd get you kicked out of academia in a hurry, but is perhaps not considered unethical in the corporate world. In any case, it seems Facebook will continue this experimentation. -- Yamla ( talk) 14:30, 3 July 2014 (UTC)
Definitely. For such a controversial personality, it is disturbing that Wikipedia dedicated more room for her alleged 'philanthropy' than to her crimes. She is personally responsible for adding obstacles to the Muller investigation on Russian interference in the US election ( https://www.cnn.com/2017/10/12/politics/sheryl-sandberg-facebook-russia-ads/index.html ), to unethical human experimentation ( https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/jul/02/facebook-apologises-psychological-experiments-on-users ) that amounted to damage on a larger scale than that of Josef Menegele a century ago. ( https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2014/07/03/sheryl-sandberg-not-sorry-for-facebook-mood-manipulation-study/ ). I would like to see this article becoming more objective and source-oriented. Suscipedepre ( talk) 01:12, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
Please see COI disclosure above.
Delete vandalism: Here
Best wishes, BC1278 ( talk) 18:39, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
Don't remove it again, references added. [1] — Preceding unsigned comment added by ToddGrande ( talk • contribs) 09:14, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
References
[1] ( t · c) buidhe 06:51, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
What's with the pushing that she's a philanthropist and author? Many other billionaires have done much more than she has but don't get this much emphasis. There's hardly anything about it in the article body. I'm not saying she isn't one, I'm saying it seems like this article has been touched by a PR team. toobigtokale ( talk) 23:36, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
Is the money you said mark Zuckerberg was giving me a lie because it want let me respond back Iam sure it's a 2600:1004:B106:EEE8:0:B:C0E2:5E01 ( talk) 20:26, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Sheryl Sandberg article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 90 days |
Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This
level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This talk page has been
mentioned by a media organization:
|
The
Wikimedia Foundation's
Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see
WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see
WP:COIRESPONSE.
|
It may be worth adding a bit to the controversies section on Facebook's controversial human experimentation, and how Sandberg has expressed regret. See for example, this article in the Washington post and this related article on whether or not this was unethical. That said, I don't think those two citations are sufficient, and I'm not clear on Sandberg's level of responsibility for this human experimentation, though she is Facebook's Chief Operating Officer. And it's certainly an open question as to how unethical it was; it'd get you kicked out of academia in a hurry, but is perhaps not considered unethical in the corporate world. In any case, it seems Facebook will continue this experimentation. -- Yamla ( talk) 14:30, 3 July 2014 (UTC)
Definitely. For such a controversial personality, it is disturbing that Wikipedia dedicated more room for her alleged 'philanthropy' than to her crimes. She is personally responsible for adding obstacles to the Muller investigation on Russian interference in the US election ( https://www.cnn.com/2017/10/12/politics/sheryl-sandberg-facebook-russia-ads/index.html ), to unethical human experimentation ( https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/jul/02/facebook-apologises-psychological-experiments-on-users ) that amounted to damage on a larger scale than that of Josef Menegele a century ago. ( https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2014/07/03/sheryl-sandberg-not-sorry-for-facebook-mood-manipulation-study/ ). I would like to see this article becoming more objective and source-oriented. Suscipedepre ( talk) 01:12, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
Please see COI disclosure above.
Delete vandalism: Here
Best wishes, BC1278 ( talk) 18:39, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
Don't remove it again, references added. [1] — Preceding unsigned comment added by ToddGrande ( talk • contribs) 09:14, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
References
[1] ( t · c) buidhe 06:51, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
What's with the pushing that she's a philanthropist and author? Many other billionaires have done much more than she has but don't get this much emphasis. There's hardly anything about it in the article body. I'm not saying she isn't one, I'm saying it seems like this article has been touched by a PR team. toobigtokale ( talk) 23:36, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
Is the money you said mark Zuckerberg was giving me a lie because it want let me respond back Iam sure it's a 2600:1004:B106:EEE8:0:B:C0E2:5E01 ( talk) 20:26, 13 February 2024 (UTC)