This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Shemale article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives:
1,
2,
3,
4,
5,
6,
7Auto-archiving period: 45 days
![]() |
![]() | This article was nominated for
deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:
|
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I suggest that the term 'humorous colloquialism' in the lead be renamed to 'slur' - since the description is clearly of a word used to degrade aggressive women by calling them men. 92.11.148.33 ( talk) 00:12, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Remove the lead part about the word shemale (I can say this because I'm a trans woman) being used as a slur against women in the 19th century, because it is not sourced. Stephanie921 ( talk) 03:30, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
A1: Distinguish between:
A2: Do this distinguishing by:
of course using subheadings where appropriate.
A3: Answer all the following questions already in the lead section.
B: Do persons who have a female face, figure (outline (seen from the *front*)) and breasts, but a penis, do really exist or are such images only fake meaning: made with PhotoShop?
C: If such persons do exist in flesh, are any of them born this way or are all such made with the help of hormones or surgery?
D: On those who are made with the help of hormones:
and what are the results?
E: If the person takes male or female hormones, does this change the "lower appearance" meaning: the primary sexual organs (vulva/vagina and penis)?
F: Do exist persons which have a vulva/vagina and a penis?
G: Are any of such persons able to procreate?
2A01:C22:D480:9700:742B:972A:C097:2A5B ( talk) 08:16, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
On most images (whether (un-shopped??) photos, (more or less badly) photoshopped images or obvious paintings) of persons who have breasts and a penis, which I have seen, to me, they look very fe-male i.e. like women in almost all aspects (face, figure (from front or back), vertical proportions) with just one exception/deviation: the penis.
If such persons are called she-males it seems to me, that this term is wrongly applied; they should be called something like partially male women.
More clear: the last noun of the term (which in all compound terms is the main part) should be something fe-male like 'woman' or 'female'; which would then be something like: partially male female.
This aspect of complete mis-noming (at least to such biological persons) should also clearly be mentioned in the article.
2A01:C22:D480:9700:742B:972A:C097:2A5B ( talk) 10:10, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Shemale article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives:
1,
2,
3,
4,
5,
6,
7Auto-archiving period: 45 days
![]() |
![]() | This article was nominated for
deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:
|
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I suggest that the term 'humorous colloquialism' in the lead be renamed to 'slur' - since the description is clearly of a word used to degrade aggressive women by calling them men. 92.11.148.33 ( talk) 00:12, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Remove the lead part about the word shemale (I can say this because I'm a trans woman) being used as a slur against women in the 19th century, because it is not sourced. Stephanie921 ( talk) 03:30, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
A1: Distinguish between:
A2: Do this distinguishing by:
of course using subheadings where appropriate.
A3: Answer all the following questions already in the lead section.
B: Do persons who have a female face, figure (outline (seen from the *front*)) and breasts, but a penis, do really exist or are such images only fake meaning: made with PhotoShop?
C: If such persons do exist in flesh, are any of them born this way or are all such made with the help of hormones or surgery?
D: On those who are made with the help of hormones:
and what are the results?
E: If the person takes male or female hormones, does this change the "lower appearance" meaning: the primary sexual organs (vulva/vagina and penis)?
F: Do exist persons which have a vulva/vagina and a penis?
G: Are any of such persons able to procreate?
2A01:C22:D480:9700:742B:972A:C097:2A5B ( talk) 08:16, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
On most images (whether (un-shopped??) photos, (more or less badly) photoshopped images or obvious paintings) of persons who have breasts and a penis, which I have seen, to me, they look very fe-male i.e. like women in almost all aspects (face, figure (from front or back), vertical proportions) with just one exception/deviation: the penis.
If such persons are called she-males it seems to me, that this term is wrongly applied; they should be called something like partially male women.
More clear: the last noun of the term (which in all compound terms is the main part) should be something fe-male like 'woman' or 'female'; which would then be something like: partially male female.
This aspect of complete mis-noming (at least to such biological persons) should also clearly be mentioned in the article.
2A01:C22:D480:9700:742B:972A:C097:2A5B ( talk) 10:10, 21 September 2022 (UTC)