 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: page moved. Vegaswikian ( talk) 20:53, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
Shape Magazine →
Shape (magazine) — Common naming practice.
Shortride (
talk)
07:50, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
- Support per nom. Mhiji ( talk) 15:18, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
- Support, seems like a non-controversial move. – ukexpat ( talk) 18:11, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
- Support. The proposed name conveys the name of the topic correctly as Shape while the current name incorrectly conveys it to be Shape Magazine. Of course, shape is a
homograph and so needs
disambiguation, and the best way to do that is to add disambiguation information as a parenthetic remark in the title, clearly distinguishing it from the name, exactly as proposed.
I agree it's non-controversial but there's no hurry and it's probably best to let the WP:RM process run its course, rather than going ahead with the move now. -- Born2cycle ( talk) 20:14, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
|
| This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: page moved. Vegaswikian ( talk) 20:53, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
Shape Magazine →
Shape (magazine) — Common naming practice.
Shortride (
talk)
07:50, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
- Support per nom. Mhiji ( talk) 15:18, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
- Support, seems like a non-controversial move. – ukexpat ( talk) 18:11, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
- Support. The proposed name conveys the name of the topic correctly as Shape while the current name incorrectly conveys it to be Shape Magazine. Of course, shape is a
homograph and so needs
disambiguation, and the best way to do that is to add disambiguation information as a parenthetic remark in the title, clearly distinguishing it from the name, exactly as proposed.
I agree it's non-controversial but there's no hurry and it's probably best to let the WP:RM process run its course, rather than going ahead with the move now. -- Born2cycle ( talk) 20:14, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.