Disambiguation | ||||
|
People, this page may have a lot of good information, but we definitely need more sources/citations. Entire passages should be deleted if we can't find the sources, especially when it comes to legal and historical issues. Mg196 16:18, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
"and even one Al-Qaeda linkman ( Iad Al-Bik)"
What is a "linkman"? OneVoice 20:08, 11 Jan 2004 (UTC)
I assume a linkman would be someone with a link to something.
This article contains many grammatical errors and poor English
"Rabin pictures in SS uniforms." This must refer to some incident, but it's completely unclear what. Real pictures? Faked? Provocations? needs some explanation. 64.165.202.161 02:37, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Shin Bet is a mistake. The real name is Shabak. It used to be called Shin Bet 50 years ago.
So should it be SHABAK or Shabak? Let me know and I'll move it. violet/riga (t) 19:31, 26 May 2005 (UTC)
No, it should be Shabak (not SHABAK) - and the page should also be changed to Shabak.
Isn't it Wikipedia policy to name articles by the most common term used in English? Is "Shabak" more common than "Shin Bet" in English texts? It appears not to be, even this article says "known in English as the Shin Bet".-- Doron 12:39, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
"The service consists of close to 5,000 employees". An anonymous editor has added this. Is there any source for this claim? Jayjg (talk) 3 July 2005 03:24 (UTC)
This is all mere speculation. No secret service ever reveals their questioning techniques. Everything written re the 'shabak technique' is merely hearsay and has not enough concrete evidence to warrant inclusion in this article.
The fact that Shabak and not Mossad were responsible for getting a copy of Krushchev's speech has been known for quite a while, but now for the first time some of the insiders have told their version of the story to Haaretz. See [1] and [2]. I didn't add these links to the article because links to Haaretz always go dead after a few weeks. Maybe someone else will post the articles on the web more permanently so we can link to those. -- Zero 04:46, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
This is the quote in the passage: (in regard to Shin Bet monitoring pro-Soviet groups in Israel)
from who's point of view?
I think a transliteration of מגן ולא יראה would be helpful and interesting, in addition to the translation. LordAmeth 06:46, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
'Magen V'lo Yerah' literary means 'defender and unseeable' implying a warrior draped in invisible cloak. Mkobi 07:48, 10 September 2007 (UTC) mkobi
I propose a merger of the page Shabak_technique with Criticism section of this page. The textual content of the separate page is almost identical to the content of the Criticism section. No further or better information is conveyed by the separate page, which is itself a stub. The information provided in the Criticism section is more fully referenced. Khavakoz 09:01, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
Disambiguation | ||||
|
People, this page may have a lot of good information, but we definitely need more sources/citations. Entire passages should be deleted if we can't find the sources, especially when it comes to legal and historical issues. Mg196 16:18, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
"and even one Al-Qaeda linkman ( Iad Al-Bik)"
What is a "linkman"? OneVoice 20:08, 11 Jan 2004 (UTC)
I assume a linkman would be someone with a link to something.
This article contains many grammatical errors and poor English
"Rabin pictures in SS uniforms." This must refer to some incident, but it's completely unclear what. Real pictures? Faked? Provocations? needs some explanation. 64.165.202.161 02:37, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Shin Bet is a mistake. The real name is Shabak. It used to be called Shin Bet 50 years ago.
So should it be SHABAK or Shabak? Let me know and I'll move it. violet/riga (t) 19:31, 26 May 2005 (UTC)
No, it should be Shabak (not SHABAK) - and the page should also be changed to Shabak.
Isn't it Wikipedia policy to name articles by the most common term used in English? Is "Shabak" more common than "Shin Bet" in English texts? It appears not to be, even this article says "known in English as the Shin Bet".-- Doron 12:39, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
"The service consists of close to 5,000 employees". An anonymous editor has added this. Is there any source for this claim? Jayjg (talk) 3 July 2005 03:24 (UTC)
This is all mere speculation. No secret service ever reveals their questioning techniques. Everything written re the 'shabak technique' is merely hearsay and has not enough concrete evidence to warrant inclusion in this article.
The fact that Shabak and not Mossad were responsible for getting a copy of Krushchev's speech has been known for quite a while, but now for the first time some of the insiders have told their version of the story to Haaretz. See [1] and [2]. I didn't add these links to the article because links to Haaretz always go dead after a few weeks. Maybe someone else will post the articles on the web more permanently so we can link to those. -- Zero 04:46, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
This is the quote in the passage: (in regard to Shin Bet monitoring pro-Soviet groups in Israel)
from who's point of view?
I think a transliteration of מגן ולא יראה would be helpful and interesting, in addition to the translation. LordAmeth 06:46, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
'Magen V'lo Yerah' literary means 'defender and unseeable' implying a warrior draped in invisible cloak. Mkobi 07:48, 10 September 2007 (UTC) mkobi
I propose a merger of the page Shabak_technique with Criticism section of this page. The textual content of the separate page is almost identical to the content of the Criticism section. No further or better information is conveyed by the separate page, which is itself a stub. The information provided in the Criticism section is more fully referenced. Khavakoz 09:01, 21 September 2007 (UTC)