![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I removed this link that was recently added to the References section. The web site may contain useful information, but as a blog, it is not a reliable source. davidwr/( talk)/( contribs) 20:48, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
Trailer release date from http://www.dnaindia.com/entertainment/report-movie-trailer-shaadi-ke-side-effects-starring-farhan-akhtar-and-vidya-balan-officially-released-1910271
Trailer perception from Biswadeep Ghosh. "The side effects of sequels". India Today. Retrieved 21 February 2014 and http://www.bollywoodnasha.com/shaadi-ke-side-effects-box-office-prediction/
Music reviews http://www.koimoi.com/bollywood-movies/music-reviews/shaadi-ke-side-effects-music-review/ and http://bollyspice.com/75611/shaadi-ke-side-effects-music-review
Asia cup from http://www.espncricinfo.com/asia-cup-2014/content/series/671665.html?template=fixtures and http://www.indicine.com/movies/bollywood/will-asia-cup-cricket-matches-affect-shaadi-ke-side-effects/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hrfunmola ( talk • contribs) 17:34, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
Vaibhave reviews are mixed and you deleting bad reviews and adding good ones. Please be impartial and put every kind of reviews. Like, NDTV Saibal Chatterjee says Sadly, a large part of Shaadi Ke Side Effects, despite charming pivotal performances by Farhan Akhtar and Vidya Balan, has nothing new to offer beyond convenient homilies on gender politics within the confines of a marriage. Zeenews Aparna Mudi says The first half is all you expect from a rom-com, it is funny, quirky, set at an even pace and mirrors modern marriages somewhat successfully. But the humour fizzles out after that. It gets lengthy and somewhat loses the appeal that it promises. Indian Express says Shubhra Gupta marriage takes two, and the tango here is only from Sid’s perspective : how about showing us what it could be like from Trisha’s ? Biswadeep Ghos says of the casting that "One can visualise Farhan as Rahul's Sid, but Vidya as Mallika's Trisha is tough to imagine. "The side effects of sequels". India Today.. Sneha May Francis writes Saket’s narrative slumps innumerable times over the two-hour-and-twenty-five-minutes screen time. http://www.emirates247.com/entertainment/films-music/bollywood-review-did-vidya-balan-and-farhan-akhtar-nail-it-in-shaadi-ke-side-effects-2014-02-27-1.539812 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hrfunmola ( talk • contribs) 14:16, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
TheRedpenofdoom Can you explain what I have done wrong. How could it be called vandalism. I just put information not from my own self but from very reliable source Business insider. see http://www.businessinsider.in/entertainment/movies/Box-Office-Shaadi-Ke-Side-Effects-Fails-ToHit-A-High-Note-Anuradha-Just-A-Shoddy-Tear-jerker/articleshow/31393894.cms Hrfunmola ( talk) 02:40, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
Hrfunmola please be careful what you assert. My only concern was the copyright violation, not if the material was sourced properly which Krimuk90 contends it isn't. -- NeilN talk to me 19:56, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
Note that this article was created by a sock-puppet of a blocked user in violation of a block or ban (see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ali Mohammad Khilji/Archive and the block logs of User:Ali Mohammad Khilji and User:Greatuser for details). Due to extensive editing by others, it is not eligible for speedy-deletion under WP:CSD#G5. Creations by banned or blocked users. davidwr/( talk)/( contribs) 18:52, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I removed this link that was recently added to the References section. The web site may contain useful information, but as a blog, it is not a reliable source. davidwr/( talk)/( contribs) 20:48, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
Trailer release date from http://www.dnaindia.com/entertainment/report-movie-trailer-shaadi-ke-side-effects-starring-farhan-akhtar-and-vidya-balan-officially-released-1910271
Trailer perception from Biswadeep Ghosh. "The side effects of sequels". India Today. Retrieved 21 February 2014 and http://www.bollywoodnasha.com/shaadi-ke-side-effects-box-office-prediction/
Music reviews http://www.koimoi.com/bollywood-movies/music-reviews/shaadi-ke-side-effects-music-review/ and http://bollyspice.com/75611/shaadi-ke-side-effects-music-review
Asia cup from http://www.espncricinfo.com/asia-cup-2014/content/series/671665.html?template=fixtures and http://www.indicine.com/movies/bollywood/will-asia-cup-cricket-matches-affect-shaadi-ke-side-effects/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hrfunmola ( talk • contribs) 17:34, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
Vaibhave reviews are mixed and you deleting bad reviews and adding good ones. Please be impartial and put every kind of reviews. Like, NDTV Saibal Chatterjee says Sadly, a large part of Shaadi Ke Side Effects, despite charming pivotal performances by Farhan Akhtar and Vidya Balan, has nothing new to offer beyond convenient homilies on gender politics within the confines of a marriage. Zeenews Aparna Mudi says The first half is all you expect from a rom-com, it is funny, quirky, set at an even pace and mirrors modern marriages somewhat successfully. But the humour fizzles out after that. It gets lengthy and somewhat loses the appeal that it promises. Indian Express says Shubhra Gupta marriage takes two, and the tango here is only from Sid’s perspective : how about showing us what it could be like from Trisha’s ? Biswadeep Ghos says of the casting that "One can visualise Farhan as Rahul's Sid, but Vidya as Mallika's Trisha is tough to imagine. "The side effects of sequels". India Today.. Sneha May Francis writes Saket’s narrative slumps innumerable times over the two-hour-and-twenty-five-minutes screen time. http://www.emirates247.com/entertainment/films-music/bollywood-review-did-vidya-balan-and-farhan-akhtar-nail-it-in-shaadi-ke-side-effects-2014-02-27-1.539812 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hrfunmola ( talk • contribs) 14:16, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
TheRedpenofdoom Can you explain what I have done wrong. How could it be called vandalism. I just put information not from my own self but from very reliable source Business insider. see http://www.businessinsider.in/entertainment/movies/Box-Office-Shaadi-Ke-Side-Effects-Fails-ToHit-A-High-Note-Anuradha-Just-A-Shoddy-Tear-jerker/articleshow/31393894.cms Hrfunmola ( talk) 02:40, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
Hrfunmola please be careful what you assert. My only concern was the copyright violation, not if the material was sourced properly which Krimuk90 contends it isn't. -- NeilN talk to me 19:56, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
Note that this article was created by a sock-puppet of a blocked user in violation of a block or ban (see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ali Mohammad Khilji/Archive and the block logs of User:Ali Mohammad Khilji and User:Greatuser for details). Due to extensive editing by others, it is not eligible for speedy-deletion under WP:CSD#G5. Creations by banned or blocked users. davidwr/( talk)/( contribs) 18:52, 19 March 2014 (UTC)