![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | It is requested that a mathematical diagram or diagrams be
included in this article to
improve its quality. Specific illustrations, plots or diagrams can be requested at the
Graphic Lab. For more information, refer to discussion on this page and/or the listing at Wikipedia:Requested images. |
Someone might like to expand on my treatment, e.g., to derive the connection between alpha, beta, and the thresholds.-- Adoniscik ( talk) 19:31, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
I believe the example leaves off (theta0-theta1)/(theta0*theta1) in the final step. 216.164.50.165 ( talk) 03:45, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
The theory section has these inequalities:
Would it be more correct to say
or even
The latter would be more in keeping with Hypothesis_testing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rajah9 ( talk • contribs) 19:45, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
Rajah9 ( talk) 14:39, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
The use of a and b is contrary to the sense in which Wald uses A and B. Since Wald's paper is authoritative and clear, I see no good reason to deviate from Wald's notation, especially not in a way that might lead to confusion.
In addition, the explanation of the approximation symbols in defining the values of a and b is incorrect or, at least, not the correct explanation. The main reason for the approximation is that these values only approximately guarantee errors of type I and II will occur with probabilities α and β (they only guarantee that at least one will be correct).
Is this MaxSPRT algorithm important enough to be included here, or is it just the authors of a paper trying to boost their citations?
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | It is requested that a mathematical diagram or diagrams be
included in this article to
improve its quality. Specific illustrations, plots or diagrams can be requested at the
Graphic Lab. For more information, refer to discussion on this page and/or the listing at Wikipedia:Requested images. |
Someone might like to expand on my treatment, e.g., to derive the connection between alpha, beta, and the thresholds.-- Adoniscik ( talk) 19:31, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
I believe the example leaves off (theta0-theta1)/(theta0*theta1) in the final step. 216.164.50.165 ( talk) 03:45, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
The theory section has these inequalities:
Would it be more correct to say
or even
The latter would be more in keeping with Hypothesis_testing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rajah9 ( talk • contribs) 19:45, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
Rajah9 ( talk) 14:39, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
The use of a and b is contrary to the sense in which Wald uses A and B. Since Wald's paper is authoritative and clear, I see no good reason to deviate from Wald's notation, especially not in a way that might lead to confusion.
In addition, the explanation of the approximation symbols in defining the values of a and b is incorrect or, at least, not the correct explanation. The main reason for the approximation is that these values only approximately guarantee errors of type I and II will occur with probabilities α and β (they only guarantee that at least one will be correct).
Is this MaxSPRT algorithm important enough to be included here, or is it just the authors of a paper trying to boost their citations?