From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Theory

Someone might like to expand on my treatment, e.g., to derive the connection between alpha, beta, and the thresholds.-- Adoniscik ( talk) 19:31, 10 January 2008 (UTC) reply

I believe the example leaves off (theta0-theta1)/(theta0*theta1) in the final step. 216.164.50.165 ( talk) 03:45, 18 November 2009 (UTC) reply

Theory section: Accept / Reject?

The theory section has these inequalities:

  • : continue monitoring (critical inequality)
  • : Accept
  • : Accept

Would it be more correct to say

  • : Reject
  • : Accept

or even

  • : Reject
  • : Fail to reject

The latter would be more in keeping with Hypothesis_testing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rajah9 ( talkcontribs) 19:45, 3 January 2011 (UTC) reply

Rajah9 ( talk) 14:39, 4 January 2011 (UTC) reply

Theory section confusing

The use of a and b is contrary to the sense in which Wald uses A and B. Since Wald's paper is authoritative and clear, I see no good reason to deviate from Wald's notation, especially not in a way that might lead to confusion.

In addition, the explanation of the approximation symbols in defining the values of a and b is incorrect or, at least, not the correct explanation. The main reason for the approximation is that these values only approximately guarantee errors of type I and II will occur with probabilities α and β (they only guarantee that at least one will be correct).

MaxSPRT

Is this MaxSPRT algorithm important enough to be included here, or is it just the authors of a paper trying to boost their citations?

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Theory

Someone might like to expand on my treatment, e.g., to derive the connection between alpha, beta, and the thresholds.-- Adoniscik ( talk) 19:31, 10 January 2008 (UTC) reply

I believe the example leaves off (theta0-theta1)/(theta0*theta1) in the final step. 216.164.50.165 ( talk) 03:45, 18 November 2009 (UTC) reply

Theory section: Accept / Reject?

The theory section has these inequalities:

  • : continue monitoring (critical inequality)
  • : Accept
  • : Accept

Would it be more correct to say

  • : Reject
  • : Accept

or even

  • : Reject
  • : Fail to reject

The latter would be more in keeping with Hypothesis_testing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rajah9 ( talkcontribs) 19:45, 3 January 2011 (UTC) reply

Rajah9 ( talk) 14:39, 4 January 2011 (UTC) reply

Theory section confusing

The use of a and b is contrary to the sense in which Wald uses A and B. Since Wald's paper is authoritative and clear, I see no good reason to deviate from Wald's notation, especially not in a way that might lead to confusion.

In addition, the explanation of the approximation symbols in defining the values of a and b is incorrect or, at least, not the correct explanation. The main reason for the approximation is that these values only approximately guarantee errors of type I and II will occur with probabilities α and β (they only guarantee that at least one will be correct).

MaxSPRT

Is this MaxSPRT algorithm important enough to be included here, or is it just the authors of a paper trying to boost their citations?


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook