This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 60 | ← | Archive 62 | Archive 63 | Archive 64 |
The result of the move request was: Not moved ( WP:SNOW). ( non-admin closure) {{u| Sdkb}} talk 04:56, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
September 11 attacks → 9/11 – As the article states, the attacks are commonly known as “9/11”, most people refer to it as “9/11”, other articles about it on Wikipedia itself have “9/11” in the title such as 9/11 conspiracy theories and 9/11 truth movement, and the United States Government’s commission into the attacks and that commission’s report on the attacks refer to it as “9/11”. MountainDew20 ( talk) 06:38, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
Everyone that I know of refers to this attack as "9/11".
enhance the accessibility and searchability of the article. — The Hand That Feeds You: Bite 14:29, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
Thoughts on expanding this sidebar to related articles? trainrobber >be me 08:16, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: It has snowed heavily today. Not moved. ( non-admin closure) ~~ AirshipJungleman29 ( talk) 19:18, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
September 11 attacks → September 11 terrorist attacks – They're terrorist attacks, so why not extend the name so everyone knows that it's terrorism? WP:CONCISE GabrielPenn4223 ( talk) 11:53, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
sufficient information to identify the topic to a person familiar with the general subject areais the goal (per the comment above) I'd say that criteria is already met – this is the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. I'm not sure how WP:CONCISE can be cited to lengthen a title. — Czello ( music) 12:35, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
Usually, titles should unambiguously define the topical scope of the article, but should be no more precise than that.As for other articles with this name, this is ambiguously the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC for this title. A read of WP:CONCISE, which was linked in the move rationale without elaboration, appears to solidly refute such a move. - Aoidh ( talk) 12:40, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
Should the “United States” in the lead be a link to the U.S.’s article, being the first mention of the country in the page? Jackvoeller ( talk) 04:20, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
In the intro section, the sentence that begins "At morning," doesn't quite read clearly to American English readers. Just a suggestion that it be changed to "That morning" or "In the morning" or a similarly appropriate substitute. 2601:CD:4000:610:F435:89A0:E7C4:EA0B ( talk) 03:50, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
This
edit request to
September 11 attacks has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
change in a "passenger revolt" to "what was most likely a passenger revolt" As it cannot be 100% confirmed if it was a passenger revolt or a malfunction of the plane. Pinkgarfunkel ( talk) 20:11, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
Second to last sentence in last paragraph of introduction implies that only Tower #1 was rebuilt and does not mention Towers 3, 4 and the incomplete Tower 2. Link to the page for the whole complex and mention there are multiple towers on the site now - a lot of people don't seem to realize that... Ee100duna ( talk) 22:06, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
I don't know who changed the photos in the Infobox, but the new photos look horrendous. I can't find any consensus in archive for this massive change, may we please revert back to original photos? Cena332 ( talk) 00:45, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
PascalHD These new photos were not discussed and just changed without any discussion, previously editors discussed photos changes to the Infobox on this article talk page first. Is it ok to add the old ones back until editors can have a agreement if we want to change. -- Cena332 ( talk) 19:50, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 60 | ← | Archive 62 | Archive 63 | Archive 64 |
The result of the move request was: Not moved ( WP:SNOW). ( non-admin closure) {{u| Sdkb}} talk 04:56, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
September 11 attacks → 9/11 – As the article states, the attacks are commonly known as “9/11”, most people refer to it as “9/11”, other articles about it on Wikipedia itself have “9/11” in the title such as 9/11 conspiracy theories and 9/11 truth movement, and the United States Government’s commission into the attacks and that commission’s report on the attacks refer to it as “9/11”. MountainDew20 ( talk) 06:38, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
Everyone that I know of refers to this attack as "9/11".
enhance the accessibility and searchability of the article. — The Hand That Feeds You: Bite 14:29, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
Thoughts on expanding this sidebar to related articles? trainrobber >be me 08:16, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: It has snowed heavily today. Not moved. ( non-admin closure) ~~ AirshipJungleman29 ( talk) 19:18, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
September 11 attacks → September 11 terrorist attacks – They're terrorist attacks, so why not extend the name so everyone knows that it's terrorism? WP:CONCISE GabrielPenn4223 ( talk) 11:53, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
sufficient information to identify the topic to a person familiar with the general subject areais the goal (per the comment above) I'd say that criteria is already met – this is the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. I'm not sure how WP:CONCISE can be cited to lengthen a title. — Czello ( music) 12:35, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
Usually, titles should unambiguously define the topical scope of the article, but should be no more precise than that.As for other articles with this name, this is ambiguously the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC for this title. A read of WP:CONCISE, which was linked in the move rationale without elaboration, appears to solidly refute such a move. - Aoidh ( talk) 12:40, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
Should the “United States” in the lead be a link to the U.S.’s article, being the first mention of the country in the page? Jackvoeller ( talk) 04:20, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
In the intro section, the sentence that begins "At morning," doesn't quite read clearly to American English readers. Just a suggestion that it be changed to "That morning" or "In the morning" or a similarly appropriate substitute. 2601:CD:4000:610:F435:89A0:E7C4:EA0B ( talk) 03:50, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
This
edit request to
September 11 attacks has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
change in a "passenger revolt" to "what was most likely a passenger revolt" As it cannot be 100% confirmed if it was a passenger revolt or a malfunction of the plane. Pinkgarfunkel ( talk) 20:11, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
Second to last sentence in last paragraph of introduction implies that only Tower #1 was rebuilt and does not mention Towers 3, 4 and the incomplete Tower 2. Link to the page for the whole complex and mention there are multiple towers on the site now - a lot of people don't seem to realize that... Ee100duna ( talk) 22:06, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
I don't know who changed the photos in the Infobox, but the new photos look horrendous. I can't find any consensus in archive for this massive change, may we please revert back to original photos? Cena332 ( talk) 00:45, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
PascalHD These new photos were not discussed and just changed without any discussion, previously editors discussed photos changes to the Infobox on this article talk page first. Is it ok to add the old ones back until editors can have a agreement if we want to change. -- Cena332 ( talk) 19:50, 3 May 2024 (UTC)