Word Sense Induction and Disambiguation task was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 22 October 2012 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into SemEval. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here. |
Multilingual and Crosslingual WSD was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 22 October 2012 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into SemEval. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here. |
This article was nominated for
deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:
|
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
Now the SemEval wiki page has sufficient content to identify with the subject. The sudden deletion of content was an attempt to wikify the page but i've undone the deletion
Please check and verify the current page before considering a page deletion. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Alvations ( talk • contribs) 17:00, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
I think you need to do some work on harmonizing tense in the descriptions of the various semevals --- you are using present where I think past is appropriate. Francis Bond ( talk) 07:41, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
Responding to a comment User_talk:Jodi.a.schneider#Semeval here:
I hope this helps, and if you want more feedback on a later version, or more details about what I mean, feel free to ping me. Jodi.a.schneider ( talk) 15:16, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
Trying to do a little bit on page improvement, so I removed this section. Jodi.a.schneider ( talk) 00:51, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
And these sentences Jodi.a.schneider ( talk) 00:57, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
I put this info into the lede, without the link. Jodi.a.schneider ( talk) 01:11, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
Further pared down, removing this Jodi.a.schneider ( talk) 01:14, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
Stages of SemEval/Senseval evaluation workshops [4]
References
Hi Jodi, thanks for cleaning up the page, but i would like to raise the point about differentiating SemEval page from the WSD page. If you left out explanation of the how and what the workshop is about, then the information will be the same as the ones on the WSD page which will go get into the problem with WP:notability. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Alvations ( talk • contribs) 04:06, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
I think the detailed tasks are probably too much for a Wikipedia article; it's even worse to have them in separate pages. The main purpose of a page about the workshop should be to explain it to laymen. Perhaps there could be references to published summaries (i.e. conference webpage or formal publication) of the task descriptions instead? Jodi.a.schneider ( talk) 10:27, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
Sadly the conference webpage links to detailed papers, no one published summaries of the workshop, they have summaries of how they fare in the task. If i were to create a summary it might be "original work". The ccnference webpage looks like the wiki sections, i.e. a list of the task and how they are carried out. Alvations ( talk) 23:21, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
This change reintroduced several errors. Please spell-check the lede. I'm leaving it alone for awhile, especially since more editors are likely to see the rescue notice. I see that you're worried about duplicating Word Sense Disambiguation; I'd worry less about that than about utterly confusing readers in the first paragraph. Jodi.a.schneider ( talk) 16:42, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
Just saw the changes you made for the page, thanks! now it's kind of more wikified than it started off. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Alvations ( talk • contribs) 18:17, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
I've put up a draft of a trimmed article: Talk:SemEval/Proposed_Revision. What do you think? It's an attempt to make this article more similar to Message Understanding Conference and Text Retrieval Conference. Jodi.a.schneider ( talk) 19:34, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
Hi Jodi, the version that you've proposed is not the best template to follow. It would have demoted the page to a stub, which isn't a solution to rescue the current page. Alvations ( talk) 05:50, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
This page seems to hold for WP:notability, and now the page seems more wikified to the general wiki readership. i am very tempted to put the Senseval-1 to SemEval-2 sections back on this page from my user-subpage. please discuss/comment about the suggestion, otherwise i will get into the whirlpool of "adf" and "rescue" and "wikifiable" and other recondite rules of wiki.
I question the need to re-challenge the notability of the SemEval, given that it has gained much attention in the bid for deletion previously http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/SemEval. This wikipedia article had also been referred to as the encylopedic source for the SemEval conference from the recent conference page. http://www.cs.york.ac.uk/semeval-2012/ Alvations ( talk) —Preceding undated comment added 10:31, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
See https://semeval.github.io/ - may have useful information for updating article. -- SarekOfVulcan (talk) 19:45, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
Word Sense Induction and Disambiguation task was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 22 October 2012 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into SemEval. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here. |
Multilingual and Crosslingual WSD was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 22 October 2012 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into SemEval. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here. |
This article was nominated for
deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:
|
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
Now the SemEval wiki page has sufficient content to identify with the subject. The sudden deletion of content was an attempt to wikify the page but i've undone the deletion
Please check and verify the current page before considering a page deletion. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Alvations ( talk • contribs) 17:00, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
I think you need to do some work on harmonizing tense in the descriptions of the various semevals --- you are using present where I think past is appropriate. Francis Bond ( talk) 07:41, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
Responding to a comment User_talk:Jodi.a.schneider#Semeval here:
I hope this helps, and if you want more feedback on a later version, or more details about what I mean, feel free to ping me. Jodi.a.schneider ( talk) 15:16, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
Trying to do a little bit on page improvement, so I removed this section. Jodi.a.schneider ( talk) 00:51, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
And these sentences Jodi.a.schneider ( talk) 00:57, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
I put this info into the lede, without the link. Jodi.a.schneider ( talk) 01:11, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
Further pared down, removing this Jodi.a.schneider ( talk) 01:14, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
Stages of SemEval/Senseval evaluation workshops [4]
References
Hi Jodi, thanks for cleaning up the page, but i would like to raise the point about differentiating SemEval page from the WSD page. If you left out explanation of the how and what the workshop is about, then the information will be the same as the ones on the WSD page which will go get into the problem with WP:notability. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Alvations ( talk • contribs) 04:06, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
I think the detailed tasks are probably too much for a Wikipedia article; it's even worse to have them in separate pages. The main purpose of a page about the workshop should be to explain it to laymen. Perhaps there could be references to published summaries (i.e. conference webpage or formal publication) of the task descriptions instead? Jodi.a.schneider ( talk) 10:27, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
Sadly the conference webpage links to detailed papers, no one published summaries of the workshop, they have summaries of how they fare in the task. If i were to create a summary it might be "original work". The ccnference webpage looks like the wiki sections, i.e. a list of the task and how they are carried out. Alvations ( talk) 23:21, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
This change reintroduced several errors. Please spell-check the lede. I'm leaving it alone for awhile, especially since more editors are likely to see the rescue notice. I see that you're worried about duplicating Word Sense Disambiguation; I'd worry less about that than about utterly confusing readers in the first paragraph. Jodi.a.schneider ( talk) 16:42, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
Just saw the changes you made for the page, thanks! now it's kind of more wikified than it started off. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Alvations ( talk • contribs) 18:17, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
I've put up a draft of a trimmed article: Talk:SemEval/Proposed_Revision. What do you think? It's an attempt to make this article more similar to Message Understanding Conference and Text Retrieval Conference. Jodi.a.schneider ( talk) 19:34, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
Hi Jodi, the version that you've proposed is not the best template to follow. It would have demoted the page to a stub, which isn't a solution to rescue the current page. Alvations ( talk) 05:50, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
This page seems to hold for WP:notability, and now the page seems more wikified to the general wiki readership. i am very tempted to put the Senseval-1 to SemEval-2 sections back on this page from my user-subpage. please discuss/comment about the suggestion, otherwise i will get into the whirlpool of "adf" and "rescue" and "wikifiable" and other recondite rules of wiki.
I question the need to re-challenge the notability of the SemEval, given that it has gained much attention in the bid for deletion previously http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/SemEval. This wikipedia article had also been referred to as the encylopedic source for the SemEval conference from the recent conference page. http://www.cs.york.ac.uk/semeval-2012/ Alvations ( talk) —Preceding undated comment added 10:31, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
See https://semeval.github.io/ - may have useful information for updating article. -- SarekOfVulcan (talk) 19:45, 1 November 2022 (UTC)