This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Schools Low‑importance This article is related to WikiProject Schools, a collaborative effort to write quality articles about schools around the world. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.SchoolsWikipedia:WikiProject SchoolsTemplate:WikiProject Schoolsschool articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Korea Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please do not just remove the tags. Attempt to fix the issues first. Thank you. Wperdue ( talk) 02:06, 9 March 2009 (UTC)wperdue reply

Again I ask you, as I have on your user discussion page User talk:24.23.176.171, to please not just remove the tags with no attempt to fix the issue and no explanation as to why you are doing so. Thank you. Wperdue ( talk) 01:04, 10 March 2009 (UTC)wperdue reply

The tags were removed again without explanation and with no attempt to correct the issues. Please refrain from this behavior. Thank you. Wperdue ( talk) 16:08, 10 March 2009 (UTC)wperdue reply

The only source used is the school's official website. The peacock terms and claims in this entry read like an advertisement. I have been unable to get the other editor to respond to my concerns. Thank you. Wperdue ( talk) 16:13, 10 March 2009 (UTC)wperdue reply

3O Agreed. There are no citations. Article reads like an advertisement. Tags are applicable. Startstop123 ( talk) 16:57, 10 March 2009 (UTC) reply

I restored the tags again, but accidentally marked it as a minor edit. Thanks. Wperdue ( talk) 16:20, 11 March 2009 (UTC)wperdue reply