This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Physics Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Engineering Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EngineeringWikipedia:WikiProject EngineeringTemplate:WikiProject EngineeringEngineering articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Energy Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

As far as I can tell, that P-v diagram should be the same as the basic Otto cycle.

The P-V diagram doesn't (claim to) represent a Scuderi cycle; it is just a generic example of a P-V diagram, which shows an ideal cycle (not an Otto cycle). I agree that it is confusing; I will go ahead and remove it. SoledadKabocha ( talk) 18:12, 21 July 2012 (UTC) reply

This doesn't look like a real different engine cycle, just marketing for Scuderi.

Lkingscott ( talk) 12:12, 21 April 2023 (UTC) reply