A fact from Scrutinyite appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 10 June 2010 ( check views). The text of the entry was as follows: Did you know... that the name of mineral scrutinyite reflects the efforts spent to distinguish it from plattnerite – another form of lead dioxide? A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2010/June.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Geology Low‑importance Talk:Scrutinyite is part of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.GeologyWikipedia:WikiProject GeologyTemplate:WikiProject GeologyGeology articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Rocks and minerals Low‑importance Scrutinyite is part of WikiProject Rocks and minerals, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use rocks and minerals resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.Rocks and mineralsWikipedia:WikiProject Rocks and mineralsTemplate:WikiProject Rocks and mineralsRocks and minerals articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality. The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Is the IPA correct? {skruːtənɛit} would seem to be more intuitive. 213.160.108.26 ( talk) 11:26, 10 June 2010 (UTC) reply

I thought of skruːtnɛit when I wrote it, but either the pdf source in the article spells it as skruːtnɛitə or my IPA level is too bad. Materialscientist ( talk) 11:43, 10 June 2010 (UTC) reply

I thought the IPA might be a bit suspect too. If you listen to the sound file from Webmineral.com (one of the references of the article), then it's definitely "skroo-tuh-nee-ite" rather than "skroot-nee-i-tuh". Maybe skruːtəniːaɪt? Since it's a DYK article it might be worth resolving today. Brammers ( talk/ c) 12:22, 10 June 2010 (UTC) reply

I've asked at the Language reference desk. Brammers ( talk/ c) 12:32, 10 June 2010 (UTC) reply

Not sure about sound quality. Possibly the pdf assumed that ITE is a standard mineral ending which doesn't need phonetic spelling, i.e. there might be a mix of IPA and non-ipa in the article. Materialscientist ( talk) 12:39, 10 June 2010 (UTC) reply

Ref desk question answered. User:Angr has updated the pronunciation to that recommended by the respondent. Brammers ( talk/ c) 12:54, 10 June 2010 (UTC) reply