This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hi, I would like to contest the deletion of this page. The reason behind the deletion was "no indication of significance". I checked Wikipedia's notability guidelines, and this article is "notable" by definition of that guideline. Below I will go through the primary criteria of the notability guideline:
I hope for someone to reply soon. Thanks, Tal Brenev ( talk) 16:22, 3 January 2014 (UTC)Tal Brenev
User Andrewjshick has added a large detailed section about the Movie Fights show. Though excellently detailed, this section fell afoul of WP:IINFO so I reverted it. I am, however, in the process of expanding the article majorly since it needs it. Sam Walton ( talk) 21:40, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
Please tell me (andrewjshick) what I should do. I don't see how this is particularly different from what I see in summaries of sporting events. Further, I am not associated with Screen Junkies, so there is no conflict of interest issue. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Andrewjshick ( talk • contribs) 01:00, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
OK, specifically, he's also looking for the "starring" at the end plus the saying that commenters ask the narrator to say in his deep voice.
Further, the bigger issue here is the removal of the Movie Fights section. Can it be put back in? Can a separate page be made? The only way anyone can see the info is if they go to @andysignore 's twitter and click a link to the old page, which in turn is static (cannot be modified). Andrewjshick ( talk) 01:11, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
So does this mean that pages for films and TV episode descriptions should not have descriptions of anything that cannot be found in a reliable published article? Andrewjshick ( talk) 12:26, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
Should I also assume that it'd be out of the question to post a link in the Screen Junkies wikipedia page to a wikia? That would be helpful, plus it'd look kinda weird if there is a detailed write-up for Honest Trailers yet no access (without guess work or accidental stumbling) to the same for Movie Fights. Especially as this took 19 hours so far to write up and will take another 4-5 hours to convert to wikia syntax. Andrewjshick ( talk) 00:14, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
I feel like this is more relevant to the topic "Screen Junkies" than the controversy itself (which is centered around "Defy Media"'s failure to act until it became a public scandal), and normally something like an ongoing and indefinite hiatus would belong in the lead, but I can't seem to find a reliable source to verify it.
It's obvious to anyone looking at their YouTube channels that no new videos have been uploaded since the incident, but to extrapolate from that would violate NOR. There was a tweet from Dan Murrell at 11:36 on 2017/10/17 that said No, [the channels]'re not [dead]. [...] It's been 10 days. We need time, please.
, but that's not even a reliable self-published/primary source for the claim that Murrell said they had temporarily ceased production (since he didn't exactly say that).
Has anyone seen anything more usable?
Hijiri 88 ( 聖 やや) 01:32, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
"Honest Trailers Commentary" should be added to the coverage of Honest Trailers as its aftershow. It should also be added to the episode list for Honest Trailers -- 64.229.90.172 ( talk) 04:11, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hi, I would like to contest the deletion of this page. The reason behind the deletion was "no indication of significance". I checked Wikipedia's notability guidelines, and this article is "notable" by definition of that guideline. Below I will go through the primary criteria of the notability guideline:
I hope for someone to reply soon. Thanks, Tal Brenev ( talk) 16:22, 3 January 2014 (UTC)Tal Brenev
User Andrewjshick has added a large detailed section about the Movie Fights show. Though excellently detailed, this section fell afoul of WP:IINFO so I reverted it. I am, however, in the process of expanding the article majorly since it needs it. Sam Walton ( talk) 21:40, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
Please tell me (andrewjshick) what I should do. I don't see how this is particularly different from what I see in summaries of sporting events. Further, I am not associated with Screen Junkies, so there is no conflict of interest issue. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Andrewjshick ( talk • contribs) 01:00, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
OK, specifically, he's also looking for the "starring" at the end plus the saying that commenters ask the narrator to say in his deep voice.
Further, the bigger issue here is the removal of the Movie Fights section. Can it be put back in? Can a separate page be made? The only way anyone can see the info is if they go to @andysignore 's twitter and click a link to the old page, which in turn is static (cannot be modified). Andrewjshick ( talk) 01:11, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
So does this mean that pages for films and TV episode descriptions should not have descriptions of anything that cannot be found in a reliable published article? Andrewjshick ( talk) 12:26, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
Should I also assume that it'd be out of the question to post a link in the Screen Junkies wikipedia page to a wikia? That would be helpful, plus it'd look kinda weird if there is a detailed write-up for Honest Trailers yet no access (without guess work or accidental stumbling) to the same for Movie Fights. Especially as this took 19 hours so far to write up and will take another 4-5 hours to convert to wikia syntax. Andrewjshick ( talk) 00:14, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
I feel like this is more relevant to the topic "Screen Junkies" than the controversy itself (which is centered around "Defy Media"'s failure to act until it became a public scandal), and normally something like an ongoing and indefinite hiatus would belong in the lead, but I can't seem to find a reliable source to verify it.
It's obvious to anyone looking at their YouTube channels that no new videos have been uploaded since the incident, but to extrapolate from that would violate NOR. There was a tweet from Dan Murrell at 11:36 on 2017/10/17 that said No, [the channels]'re not [dead]. [...] It's been 10 days. We need time, please.
, but that's not even a reliable self-published/primary source for the claim that Murrell said they had temporarily ceased production (since he didn't exactly say that).
Has anyone seen anything more usable?
Hijiri 88 ( 聖 やや) 01:32, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
"Honest Trailers Commentary" should be added to the coverage of Honest Trailers as its aftershow. It should also be added to the episode list for Honest Trailers -- 64.229.90.172 ( talk) 04:11, 4 June 2023 (UTC)