Scott Mills (radio show) received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article. |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Scott Mills (radio show) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I have made the following official complaint to the BBC:
I was not aware that the BBC condone vandalism. Does this mean that Scott Mills and Mark Chapman will be creating a slashdot or kuro5hin account to deliberately vandalise those websites? Ta bu shi da yu 02:18, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
I don't think this is a necessary complain, to be honest with you. I think this is a case where we just have to not take Wikipedia so seriously. It wasn't as if they started the vandalism - they just noted that it was going on (and, addimtedly, taking part). But it was just a laugh! Robdurbar 08:37, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
dont u think ur takin it a bit 2 seriasly....maybe u shuld just drop it....ny way, it makes ur web more intrestin!
I agree, I feel as though you are taking this far too seriously, the majority of people who will read about the radio 1 presenters will be their listeners and know it's just a bit of fun going on between the presenters. There's no malice involved, it's pretty innocent stuff.
Why all the trouble? They came, they vandalised, they got nicked. Ban 'em and be done with it. -- Kim Bruning 10:33, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
Shut up you miserable waster. Radio 1 is designed for fun and jokes. You have a problem???? go listen to radio 4 where you're allowed to have your head up your own arse. If not, don't make pointless complaints and waste the license fee paying someone to read and burn your complaint. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.193.172.54 ( talk) 18:04, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
Moved to Talk:Scott Mills; that is where the merge tag directs you Robdurbar 17:04, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
Isn't he the "nastiest man in the world" or "angriest man in the world" rather than nasty pizza man (although that is what he is) Pickle 16:06, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
In the article it says "Scott begins the show with a catchphrase. On Monday - Thursday the catchphrase is "Alright Treacle"". I haven't heard him say this for a while, I don't even think he says it any more and for this reason I have removed. It could be mentioned somewhere else in the article though. -- TwentiethApril1986 (talk) 10:46, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
I have been through the article and done my best to make it more encyclopaedic in language and accurate in grammar, and removed the many sentences and phrases repeated almost verbatim in multiple sections. However, I think it could do with some more work from a fresh pair of eyes. There is still a lot of unsourced material on this page, especially regarding the format, which really needs someone to find independent verifications. Also, when adding to the article, I often used the term 'programme' rather than 'show'. I was unsure whether to continue with the latter term for consistency in the article, but as neither is a very scientific term, I felt alternating between the two made the article more readable-does anyone have an opinion on this? Please change my 'programme' edits to 'show' if you disagree with me. Jomunro ( talk) 21:30, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
Moved from User talk:Adambro. See here. Adambro ( talk) 16:48, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
Why have you removed my edit to the Scott Mills Show Jammmie999 ( talk) 16:23, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
The paragraph on Scott Mills: The Musical needs a rewrite to state what actually happened, with references. At present it is pretending that it's a future event. -- Redrose64 ( talk) 22:15, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
The first paragraph on Radio 1 controversy doesnt need to be in this page as it is about Chris Moyles not scott mills. So, not really relevant. 122.57.213.230 ( talk) 12:31, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
The past features section is rather long and messy. How would others feel if the section was reduced to a paragraph or two? -- AntL ( talk) 18:06, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
Scott Mills (radio show) received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article. |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Scott Mills (radio show) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I have made the following official complaint to the BBC:
I was not aware that the BBC condone vandalism. Does this mean that Scott Mills and Mark Chapman will be creating a slashdot or kuro5hin account to deliberately vandalise those websites? Ta bu shi da yu 02:18, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
I don't think this is a necessary complain, to be honest with you. I think this is a case where we just have to not take Wikipedia so seriously. It wasn't as if they started the vandalism - they just noted that it was going on (and, addimtedly, taking part). But it was just a laugh! Robdurbar 08:37, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
dont u think ur takin it a bit 2 seriasly....maybe u shuld just drop it....ny way, it makes ur web more intrestin!
I agree, I feel as though you are taking this far too seriously, the majority of people who will read about the radio 1 presenters will be their listeners and know it's just a bit of fun going on between the presenters. There's no malice involved, it's pretty innocent stuff.
Why all the trouble? They came, they vandalised, they got nicked. Ban 'em and be done with it. -- Kim Bruning 10:33, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
Shut up you miserable waster. Radio 1 is designed for fun and jokes. You have a problem???? go listen to radio 4 where you're allowed to have your head up your own arse. If not, don't make pointless complaints and waste the license fee paying someone to read and burn your complaint. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.193.172.54 ( talk) 18:04, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
Moved to Talk:Scott Mills; that is where the merge tag directs you Robdurbar 17:04, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
Isn't he the "nastiest man in the world" or "angriest man in the world" rather than nasty pizza man (although that is what he is) Pickle 16:06, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
In the article it says "Scott begins the show with a catchphrase. On Monday - Thursday the catchphrase is "Alright Treacle"". I haven't heard him say this for a while, I don't even think he says it any more and for this reason I have removed. It could be mentioned somewhere else in the article though. -- TwentiethApril1986 (talk) 10:46, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
I have been through the article and done my best to make it more encyclopaedic in language and accurate in grammar, and removed the many sentences and phrases repeated almost verbatim in multiple sections. However, I think it could do with some more work from a fresh pair of eyes. There is still a lot of unsourced material on this page, especially regarding the format, which really needs someone to find independent verifications. Also, when adding to the article, I often used the term 'programme' rather than 'show'. I was unsure whether to continue with the latter term for consistency in the article, but as neither is a very scientific term, I felt alternating between the two made the article more readable-does anyone have an opinion on this? Please change my 'programme' edits to 'show' if you disagree with me. Jomunro ( talk) 21:30, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
Moved from User talk:Adambro. See here. Adambro ( talk) 16:48, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
Why have you removed my edit to the Scott Mills Show Jammmie999 ( talk) 16:23, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
The paragraph on Scott Mills: The Musical needs a rewrite to state what actually happened, with references. At present it is pretending that it's a future event. -- Redrose64 ( talk) 22:15, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
The first paragraph on Radio 1 controversy doesnt need to be in this page as it is about Chris Moyles not scott mills. So, not really relevant. 122.57.213.230 ( talk) 12:31, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
The past features section is rather long and messy. How would others feel if the section was reduced to a paragraph or two? -- AntL ( talk) 18:06, 18 January 2013 (UTC)