Text and/or other creative content from this version of Scaleform Corporation was copied or moved into Scaleform GFx with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
Can List of games using Scaleform be merged into this? Neither are too long. -- Wonderfl (reply) 14:01, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
I'm removing this line:
basic HTML support for TextField objects and XML/CSS I/O support
HTML support in TextFields is covered by the aforementioned support for all major Flash display classes. I'm not sure what "XML/CSS I/O support" is expressing, and it's unsourced so I can't get any clarity. -- Consumed Crustacean ( talk) 04:42, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
I don't understand why the split happened [1] [2]. Scaleform Corporation is now just a stub of an article. The only thing we had to say about it was that it created this product, and now that this product is spun-out there's not much left. In fact that lack of notability was given as the reason for the split, but it seems like it indicates that the opposite should be the case. That is, one article should encompass both the product and the company, and the company shouldn't have its own article at all. -- Consumed Crustacean ( talk) 04:49, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Text and/or other creative content from this version of Scaleform Corporation was copied or moved into Scaleform GFx with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
Can List of games using Scaleform be merged into this? Neither are too long. -- Wonderfl (reply) 14:01, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
I'm removing this line:
basic HTML support for TextField objects and XML/CSS I/O support
HTML support in TextFields is covered by the aforementioned support for all major Flash display classes. I'm not sure what "XML/CSS I/O support" is expressing, and it's unsourced so I can't get any clarity. -- Consumed Crustacean ( talk) 04:42, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
I don't understand why the split happened [1] [2]. Scaleform Corporation is now just a stub of an article. The only thing we had to say about it was that it created this product, and now that this product is spun-out there's not much left. In fact that lack of notability was given as the reason for the split, but it seems like it indicates that the opposite should be the case. That is, one article should encompass both the product and the company, and the company shouldn't have its own article at all. -- Consumed Crustacean ( talk) 04:49, 6 July 2015 (UTC)