 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
From the Sarasota city map
There are more... WhisperToMe ( talk) 04:21, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Proposed merge of Emma E. Booker Elementary School into Sarasota County Public Schools
As per the PROD discussion; there is consensus to merge this article to the school district, or alternatively to create an article on Emma E. Booker herself. -- Rockstone Send me a message! 07:59, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose merge per my reasoning at the AfD. The article to be merged passes WP:GNG, I don't think merging the article would benefit our readers. The AfD was a fairly solid "keep" in my opinion, I'm not seeing a consensus to merge at all. NemesisAT ( talk) 09:37, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose The AfD provided sufficient evidence that there is
WP:GNG for this article to stand on its own. The closing admin noted that the merge could happen. I am pinging
Star Mississippi because I think the closing comments seem to be ambiguous and definitely do not want to see this go through
WP:DRV –
The Grid (
talk)
14:54, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks @ The Grid. Correct. It could be included, not that it must. Will amend closing statement as I too would like to avoid DRV Star Mississippi 15:10, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose I never saw consensus to merge. A merger proposal following on the heels of a failed deletion proposal circumvents the entire AFD process. Discant X 17:33, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose merge. There was sufficient coverage presented in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emma E. Booker Elementary School to establish notability per Wikipedia:Notabilty#General notability guideline. A merge of Emma E. Booker Elementary School into Sarasota County Public Schools would result in either undue weight (if the merge contained everything in the school article) or a lot of sourced, encyclopedic information being lost (if the merge did not use a lot of the content in the school article) which does not benefit readers. Cunard ( talk) 12:24, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
Oppose: this school has so much unique notability because of Bush being there during 9/11. With that said, public elementary schools generally aren’t notable enough in their own right to inherently have a Wikipedia page. This article only exists because of Bush, and it should stay that way. Hence, I will add a sentence in the lead section explaining that. Mrbeastmodeallday ( talk) 12:14, 10 March 2022 (UTC)WP:STRIKESOCK – The Grid ( talk) 14:36, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
|
| This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
From the Sarasota city map
There are more... WhisperToMe ( talk) 04:21, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Proposed merge of Emma E. Booker Elementary School into Sarasota County Public Schools
As per the PROD discussion; there is consensus to merge this article to the school district, or alternatively to create an article on Emma E. Booker herself. -- Rockstone Send me a message! 07:59, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose merge per my reasoning at the AfD. The article to be merged passes WP:GNG, I don't think merging the article would benefit our readers. The AfD was a fairly solid "keep" in my opinion, I'm not seeing a consensus to merge at all. NemesisAT ( talk) 09:37, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose The AfD provided sufficient evidence that there is
WP:GNG for this article to stand on its own. The closing admin noted that the merge could happen. I am pinging
Star Mississippi because I think the closing comments seem to be ambiguous and definitely do not want to see this go through
WP:DRV –
The Grid (
talk)
14:54, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks @ The Grid. Correct. It could be included, not that it must. Will amend closing statement as I too would like to avoid DRV Star Mississippi 15:10, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose I never saw consensus to merge. A merger proposal following on the heels of a failed deletion proposal circumvents the entire AFD process. Discant X 17:33, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose merge. There was sufficient coverage presented in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emma E. Booker Elementary School to establish notability per Wikipedia:Notabilty#General notability guideline. A merge of Emma E. Booker Elementary School into Sarasota County Public Schools would result in either undue weight (if the merge contained everything in the school article) or a lot of sourced, encyclopedic information being lost (if the merge did not use a lot of the content in the school article) which does not benefit readers. Cunard ( talk) 12:24, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
Oppose: this school has so much unique notability because of Bush being there during 9/11. With that said, public elementary schools generally aren’t notable enough in their own right to inherently have a Wikipedia page. This article only exists because of Bush, and it should stay that way. Hence, I will add a sentence in the lead section explaining that. Mrbeastmodeallday ( talk) 12:14, 10 March 2022 (UTC)WP:STRIKESOCK – The Grid ( talk) 14:36, 29 July 2022 (UTC)