This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.
|
New article, mainly includes criticism of Whitson's activities. She's probaly done positive things. Feel free to add whatever can be reliably sourced. Historicist ( talk) 19:09, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
AMuseo, I've highlighted the bits of the The Times article that explicitly apply to Whitson. I don't think you are parsing the language correctly.
The "and most of his [Stork's] colleagues" is not related to Whitson specifically, it is a statement about the Middle East department, therefore it it is not relevant for this BLP. The "unlikely to reassure anyone.." is, according to my reading, referring to the researcher hired from Electronic Intifada. Sean.hoyland - talk 14:24, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
Also you seem to be focusing only on negative views of HRW in your HRW related edits. Are you planning to balance material you add by adding other material so that you ensure that your edits do not move articles away from mandatory NPOV compliance ? Sean.hoyland - talk 14:48, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
sean - i wrote the facts, not POV. it makes no difference that hrw has been publishing reports about libya for years, as you say. what comes out is that the hrw head of the middle east division actually felt that reforms in libya were taking place two years ago, and only now, acknowledges her mistake. not sure why you feel this is not appropriate. Soosim ( talk) 17:47, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
If it talks like a bigot, it usually is a bigot. She hates Israel, and that colours everything she does. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tony Riley ( talk • contribs) 14:45, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for the author's effort. But he tone of the article is not encyclopedic. The second sentence is already attacking the person described. The rest reads like a rambling whose purpose is less to inform than to demolish. Topics and sources are selective. I felt less scorn from auhtors while reading Hitlers' biography. Sorry not to be more supporting. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.227.38.235 ( talk) 16:36, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
In this article we presently have a lot of nevgative view on the subject from various advocacy groups/persons:
....and other times, incidentally. The conclusion I draw from these discussions are that they are not reliable (especially for a BLP). I am removing it, Huldra ( talk) 23:38, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
I have started a thread at the BLP noticeboard to get a few more eyes on this biography. Andreas JN 466 18:59, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
me and my family i being a ex army officer are been a subject of such inhuman experimentations 39.60.176.198 ( talk) 07:15, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.
|
New article, mainly includes criticism of Whitson's activities. She's probaly done positive things. Feel free to add whatever can be reliably sourced. Historicist ( talk) 19:09, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
AMuseo, I've highlighted the bits of the The Times article that explicitly apply to Whitson. I don't think you are parsing the language correctly.
The "and most of his [Stork's] colleagues" is not related to Whitson specifically, it is a statement about the Middle East department, therefore it it is not relevant for this BLP. The "unlikely to reassure anyone.." is, according to my reading, referring to the researcher hired from Electronic Intifada. Sean.hoyland - talk 14:24, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
Also you seem to be focusing only on negative views of HRW in your HRW related edits. Are you planning to balance material you add by adding other material so that you ensure that your edits do not move articles away from mandatory NPOV compliance ? Sean.hoyland - talk 14:48, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
sean - i wrote the facts, not POV. it makes no difference that hrw has been publishing reports about libya for years, as you say. what comes out is that the hrw head of the middle east division actually felt that reforms in libya were taking place two years ago, and only now, acknowledges her mistake. not sure why you feel this is not appropriate. Soosim ( talk) 17:47, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
If it talks like a bigot, it usually is a bigot. She hates Israel, and that colours everything she does. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tony Riley ( talk • contribs) 14:45, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for the author's effort. But he tone of the article is not encyclopedic. The second sentence is already attacking the person described. The rest reads like a rambling whose purpose is less to inform than to demolish. Topics and sources are selective. I felt less scorn from auhtors while reading Hitlers' biography. Sorry not to be more supporting. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.227.38.235 ( talk) 16:36, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
In this article we presently have a lot of nevgative view on the subject from various advocacy groups/persons:
....and other times, incidentally. The conclusion I draw from these discussions are that they are not reliable (especially for a BLP). I am removing it, Huldra ( talk) 23:38, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
I have started a thread at the BLP noticeboard to get a few more eyes on this biography. Andreas JN 466 18:59, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
me and my family i being a ex army officer are been a subject of such inhuman experimentations 39.60.176.198 ( talk) 07:15, 1 March 2024 (UTC)