This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Santa Rosa, California article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I took out Sonoma State University from under the list of education institutes. Sonoma State is not in Santa Rosa, so it doesn't belong on the Santa Rosa page, even if it is noted as being in Rohnert Park. They are two seperate cities, so vital facts about one should not be on the page of the other. -- Lauren H. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.105.79.217 ( talk) 02:47, 4 November 2006
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Santa Rosa, California. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.ci.healdsburg.ca.us/Modules/ShowDocument.aspx?documentid=411When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 06:38, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
Greetings fellow editors, Previously the old courthouse square (an image from prior to its redesign) featured in the lede. Prior to the Tubbs fire I had swapped in an image of the Fountaingrove Round Barn then when that was lost I lastly swapped in the Roseberg's Dept. Store building. I tried to find a Santa Rosa building/landmark of note and emblematic of the city but I invite others to swap out this image of Rosenbergs if there might be a better more Santa Rosanesque image to replace it with. Thank you. 86.218.97.116 ( talk) 20:37, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Santa Rosa, California's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "USCensusEst2018":
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:29, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Alta Vista Homeowners Association, Sonoma County, California. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. signed, Rosguill talk 20:35, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
Regarding the claim "The median age was 36.7 years." I don't see how that could plausibly be the case. For it to be a median, it must either be an actual recorded age in the dataset or the mean of two such ages -- and 36.7 cannot be either, unless the original ages were recorded as decimals. That's not how it's recorded in the census, and not how it's recorded anywhere I've seen. I checked the 2010 census and there is nothing like that in the data. I'm not sure where this number came from, so I've added a citation needed template. I'm figuring it's probably supposed to be the mean rather than the median, or that it's somebody's original research and they made a mistake. -- Wclark ( talk) 20:59, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
Debate to be had about chapter order but the blanket reversion seems a bit broad brush. I don;t see any vandalism or ill intent here from a newish editor. Could someone look at what happened before we get an edit war and waste an admin's time? YellowFratello ( talk) 07:39, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
santa rosa hit 112 yesterday https://abcnews.go.com/US/bay-area-hit-record-temperatures-officials-californians-conserve/story?id=89413294 73.170.203.143 ( talk) 23:37, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
An anon updated the temp and date to the new record on Sept 6, 2022 of 114. This is cited at the existing reference of the NOAA. However, All of the local news around the bay area reported a high of 115 on that day, according to the National Weather Service. So now I don't know which record is 'canonical', and I haven't (yet) found NWS's record for that. I do think that it should still note that the last time the record was set was in 1913, it's an important historical reference. cheers. anastrophe, an editor he is. 03:15, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Santa Rosa, California article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I took out Sonoma State University from under the list of education institutes. Sonoma State is not in Santa Rosa, so it doesn't belong on the Santa Rosa page, even if it is noted as being in Rohnert Park. They are two seperate cities, so vital facts about one should not be on the page of the other. -- Lauren H. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.105.79.217 ( talk) 02:47, 4 November 2006
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Santa Rosa, California. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.ci.healdsburg.ca.us/Modules/ShowDocument.aspx?documentid=411When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 06:38, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
Greetings fellow editors, Previously the old courthouse square (an image from prior to its redesign) featured in the lede. Prior to the Tubbs fire I had swapped in an image of the Fountaingrove Round Barn then when that was lost I lastly swapped in the Roseberg's Dept. Store building. I tried to find a Santa Rosa building/landmark of note and emblematic of the city but I invite others to swap out this image of Rosenbergs if there might be a better more Santa Rosanesque image to replace it with. Thank you. 86.218.97.116 ( talk) 20:37, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Santa Rosa, California's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "USCensusEst2018":
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:29, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Alta Vista Homeowners Association, Sonoma County, California. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. signed, Rosguill talk 20:35, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
Regarding the claim "The median age was 36.7 years." I don't see how that could plausibly be the case. For it to be a median, it must either be an actual recorded age in the dataset or the mean of two such ages -- and 36.7 cannot be either, unless the original ages were recorded as decimals. That's not how it's recorded in the census, and not how it's recorded anywhere I've seen. I checked the 2010 census and there is nothing like that in the data. I'm not sure where this number came from, so I've added a citation needed template. I'm figuring it's probably supposed to be the mean rather than the median, or that it's somebody's original research and they made a mistake. -- Wclark ( talk) 20:59, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
Debate to be had about chapter order but the blanket reversion seems a bit broad brush. I don;t see any vandalism or ill intent here from a newish editor. Could someone look at what happened before we get an edit war and waste an admin's time? YellowFratello ( talk) 07:39, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
santa rosa hit 112 yesterday https://abcnews.go.com/US/bay-area-hit-record-temperatures-officials-californians-conserve/story?id=89413294 73.170.203.143 ( talk) 23:37, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
An anon updated the temp and date to the new record on Sept 6, 2022 of 114. This is cited at the existing reference of the NOAA. However, All of the local news around the bay area reported a high of 115 on that day, according to the National Weather Service. So now I don't know which record is 'canonical', and I haven't (yet) found NWS's record for that. I do think that it should still note that the last time the record was set was in 1913, it's an important historical reference. cheers. anastrophe, an editor he is. 03:15, 8 October 2022 (UTC)