 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Not moved per consensus in discussion. Opponents argued that the move would violate MOS:TM, WP:TITLETM, and WP:ALLCAPS Combefere ❯❯❯ Talk 00:49, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
Samsung S8300 UltraTouch →
Samsung S8300 UltraTOUCH – As marketed, mentioned in prose, and apparently prevalently used in web search results. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (
talk)
04:06, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose: Leaning against, per MOS:TM / WP:TITLETM / WP:ALLCAPS. The partial all-caps is purely promotional styling, and the camelcase is much more like an ordinary brand name in English. CNET doesn't use it. Some others don't either – e.g., here and here and here. It's not an abbreviation. — BarrelProof ( talk) 00:23, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose: per
MOS:TM,
WP:TITLETM and
WP:ALLCAPS. At
WP:TITLETM :
Article titles follow standard English text formatting in the case of trademarks, unless the trademarked spelling is demonstrably the most common usage in sources independent of the owner of the trademark.
A Google search and Google books search indicates that there probably isn't good reason to retain camel case either but to render the title as Samsung S8300 Ultra Touch. Regards, Cinderella157 ( talk) 01:41, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
|
| This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Not moved per consensus in discussion. Opponents argued that the move would violate MOS:TM, WP:TITLETM, and WP:ALLCAPS Combefere ❯❯❯ Talk 00:49, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
Samsung S8300 UltraTouch →
Samsung S8300 UltraTOUCH – As marketed, mentioned in prose, and apparently prevalently used in web search results. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (
talk)
04:06, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose: Leaning against, per MOS:TM / WP:TITLETM / WP:ALLCAPS. The partial all-caps is purely promotional styling, and the camelcase is much more like an ordinary brand name in English. CNET doesn't use it. Some others don't either – e.g., here and here and here. It's not an abbreviation. — BarrelProof ( talk) 00:23, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose: per
MOS:TM,
WP:TITLETM and
WP:ALLCAPS. At
WP:TITLETM :
Article titles follow standard English text formatting in the case of trademarks, unless the trademarked spelling is demonstrably the most common usage in sources independent of the owner of the trademark.
A Google search and Google books search indicates that there probably isn't good reason to retain camel case either but to render the title as Samsung S8300 Ultra Touch. Regards, Cinderella157 ( talk) 01:41, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.