This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Same-sex marriage in Mexico article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 90 days |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Durango is now highlighted green indicating a court order for legalization. A court order is not indicated on any Wikipedia page, nor can I find any source to verify this ruling. Please provide references and make the appropriate change to the text of this page. Andrew1444 ( talk) 13:38, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
Now moot: gov'r has decreed SSM. — kwami ( talk) 20:16, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
The last marriage statistics were from 2015. Anyone up for updating them? Bkatcher ( talk) 13:08, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
The general term is concubinato igualitario. Sociedad de convivencia only applies for Mexico City. Coahuila call them Pacto Civil de solidaridad.
Actually, it would be good to make a deeper research about this subject because the Supreme Court has stated (after Colima and Jalisco cases) that civil unions must be an alternative to both opposite and same-sex couples but same-sex marriage must always be legal. States can't restrict civil unions just to same-sex couples and marriage to opposite-sex couples.
Same-sex couples still prefer marriage, but opposite-sex couples are shifting towards 'concubinato'. My list of states that have harmonised their laws related to 'concubinato' is not extensive. Actually, before harmonisation, some same-sex couples in San Luis Potosí demanded injuctions for civil union and not marriage: https://www.elsoldesanluis.com.mx/local/parejas-del-mismo-sexo-tambien-recurren-al-concubinato-2050830.html Aleqc ( talk) 21:08, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Guanajuato is considering legalization. Should we add those dates to the effective dates, when the effective dates do not indicate a change in state law? — kwami ( talk) 16:53, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
I agree with a need for consensus, and I also see a need for discretion by all of us concerning which is actually "the" state that makes SSM legal throughout Mexico. At this point we have Guerrero, México, Tabasco and Tamaulipas that have approved SSM but have not published nor issued a date effective--any one of these four could be the final jurisdiction in Mexico; I am not arguing a change, just a clarification that SSM is not really fully legal in any of these states. Andrew1444 ( talk) 20:42, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
Also, once the five pending states are done, we should be able to simplify the map. Striping isn't visible at small scales, and we could integrate where SSM doesn't count as marriage for adoption: dark blue -- full legality; grey blue -- not yet legal under state law; maroon -- SSM but not full marriage equality. — kwami ( talk) 04:43, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Same-sex marriage in Mexico article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 90 days |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Durango is now highlighted green indicating a court order for legalization. A court order is not indicated on any Wikipedia page, nor can I find any source to verify this ruling. Please provide references and make the appropriate change to the text of this page. Andrew1444 ( talk) 13:38, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
Now moot: gov'r has decreed SSM. — kwami ( talk) 20:16, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
The last marriage statistics were from 2015. Anyone up for updating them? Bkatcher ( talk) 13:08, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
The general term is concubinato igualitario. Sociedad de convivencia only applies for Mexico City. Coahuila call them Pacto Civil de solidaridad.
Actually, it would be good to make a deeper research about this subject because the Supreme Court has stated (after Colima and Jalisco cases) that civil unions must be an alternative to both opposite and same-sex couples but same-sex marriage must always be legal. States can't restrict civil unions just to same-sex couples and marriage to opposite-sex couples.
Same-sex couples still prefer marriage, but opposite-sex couples are shifting towards 'concubinato'. My list of states that have harmonised their laws related to 'concubinato' is not extensive. Actually, before harmonisation, some same-sex couples in San Luis Potosí demanded injuctions for civil union and not marriage: https://www.elsoldesanluis.com.mx/local/parejas-del-mismo-sexo-tambien-recurren-al-concubinato-2050830.html Aleqc ( talk) 21:08, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Guanajuato is considering legalization. Should we add those dates to the effective dates, when the effective dates do not indicate a change in state law? — kwami ( talk) 16:53, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
I agree with a need for consensus, and I also see a need for discretion by all of us concerning which is actually "the" state that makes SSM legal throughout Mexico. At this point we have Guerrero, México, Tabasco and Tamaulipas that have approved SSM but have not published nor issued a date effective--any one of these four could be the final jurisdiction in Mexico; I am not arguing a change, just a clarification that SSM is not really fully legal in any of these states. Andrew1444 ( talk) 20:42, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
Also, once the five pending states are done, we should be able to simplify the map. Striping isn't visible at small scales, and we could integrate where SSM doesn't count as marriage for adoption: dark blue -- full legality; grey blue -- not yet legal under state law; maroon -- SSM but not full marriage equality. — kwami ( talk) 04:43, 28 October 2022 (UTC)