This
level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
There has been some warring over the inclusion of this category. While lox is certainly a breakfast food and I thoroughly enjoy a little smoked salmon in my scrambled eggs, it may not be appropriate to categorize the entire page this way as it is about the concept of salmon as food as a whole, not just lox, which has it's own article. Ironically it is not in the breakfast food category. Thoughts? Beeblebrox ( talk) 20:54, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
Shouldn't there be a dedicated section of this article on the health benefits / concerns of eating salmon? Cramming it all into the introduction is an odd choice. The background on different types of omega-3 seems particualrly odd in the introduction section. I'm removing it. Leopd ( talk) 04:57, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
I was hoping for some info re the various species & their flavor characteristics/hierarchy.
Bfpage | leave a message 18:03, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
I have to question why we have an infobox detailing the characteristics of raw wild Atlanticsalmon, which our own article identifies as being only about 1% of the salmon consumed by humans. Beeblebrox ( talk) 22:23, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
Which of these two photos better illustrates a grilled salmon?
An editor is trying to edit war Photo 2 into the article as a replacement for Photo 1 on the grounds of "hi quality". To me, Photo 2 appears at first glance to be a jumble of roasted potatoes and lemons with some sort of mess in the middle. On closer examination of the enlarged image, the mess in the middle appears as raw fish slightly cooked by some method around the edges. Photo 2 may have technical virtues such as resolution and lighting, but has little to recommend it as an appropriate illustration of a grilled salmon. -- Epipelagic ( talk) 17:16, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Photo 1 : i see more metal than clear fish, its more How to grill fish, than grilled fish... Photo2: focus stacking included, seen all, witout DOF failures, bigger size and more cool looking (by my opinion). -- PetarM ( talk) 17:30, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
The article seems to promote farmed salmon at the expense of wild salmon. For instance, it mentions the risk of parasites in wild salmon (vs. farmed salmon). Yet the parasite mentioned, Anisakis, occurs in cetacean-rich waters and the article about it specifically mentions Norway as a problem area.
Perhaps a salmon farmer has done a little touching up of this article? — 40.142.140.74 ( talk) 15:27, 10 August 2019 (UTC)
No mention of vitamin D on the nutrition table, despite https://fdc.nal.usda.gov/fdc-app.html#/food-details/175167/nutrients — Preceding unsigned comment added by Derwos ( talk • contribs) 23:00, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
I stumbled across an image, which has salmon as #1 vitamin D source. It claims 28.4 µg per 6 oz filet. Seems that there ain't too much info on this. 46.132.53.179 ( talk) 08:23, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
The title ‘salmon as food’ I think can be shortened to ‘salmon (dish)’ or ‘salmon (food)’. Roastedbeanz1 ( talk) 17:05, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
[[Salmon (food)]]
then that is taken care of.
Invasive Spices (
talk) 14 February 2022 (UTC)This
level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
There has been some warring over the inclusion of this category. While lox is certainly a breakfast food and I thoroughly enjoy a little smoked salmon in my scrambled eggs, it may not be appropriate to categorize the entire page this way as it is about the concept of salmon as food as a whole, not just lox, which has it's own article. Ironically it is not in the breakfast food category. Thoughts? Beeblebrox ( talk) 20:54, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
Shouldn't there be a dedicated section of this article on the health benefits / concerns of eating salmon? Cramming it all into the introduction is an odd choice. The background on different types of omega-3 seems particualrly odd in the introduction section. I'm removing it. Leopd ( talk) 04:57, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
I was hoping for some info re the various species & their flavor characteristics/hierarchy.
Bfpage | leave a message 18:03, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
I have to question why we have an infobox detailing the characteristics of raw wild Atlanticsalmon, which our own article identifies as being only about 1% of the salmon consumed by humans. Beeblebrox ( talk) 22:23, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
Which of these two photos better illustrates a grilled salmon?
An editor is trying to edit war Photo 2 into the article as a replacement for Photo 1 on the grounds of "hi quality". To me, Photo 2 appears at first glance to be a jumble of roasted potatoes and lemons with some sort of mess in the middle. On closer examination of the enlarged image, the mess in the middle appears as raw fish slightly cooked by some method around the edges. Photo 2 may have technical virtues such as resolution and lighting, but has little to recommend it as an appropriate illustration of a grilled salmon. -- Epipelagic ( talk) 17:16, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Photo 1 : i see more metal than clear fish, its more How to grill fish, than grilled fish... Photo2: focus stacking included, seen all, witout DOF failures, bigger size and more cool looking (by my opinion). -- PetarM ( talk) 17:30, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
The article seems to promote farmed salmon at the expense of wild salmon. For instance, it mentions the risk of parasites in wild salmon (vs. farmed salmon). Yet the parasite mentioned, Anisakis, occurs in cetacean-rich waters and the article about it specifically mentions Norway as a problem area.
Perhaps a salmon farmer has done a little touching up of this article? — 40.142.140.74 ( talk) 15:27, 10 August 2019 (UTC)
No mention of vitamin D on the nutrition table, despite https://fdc.nal.usda.gov/fdc-app.html#/food-details/175167/nutrients — Preceding unsigned comment added by Derwos ( talk • contribs) 23:00, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
I stumbled across an image, which has salmon as #1 vitamin D source. It claims 28.4 µg per 6 oz filet. Seems that there ain't too much info on this. 46.132.53.179 ( talk) 08:23, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
The title ‘salmon as food’ I think can be shortened to ‘salmon (dish)’ or ‘salmon (food)’. Roastedbeanz1 ( talk) 17:05, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
[[Salmon (food)]]
then that is taken care of.
Invasive Spices (
talk) 14 February 2022 (UTC)