![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | It is requested that an image or photograph of Sakai people (Indonesia) be
included in this article to
improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific
media request template where possible.
Wikipedians in Indonesia may be able to help! The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Hi @ Yosri:. In reference to your recent undo ( Special:Diff/864030107), based on the 2 sources that you've used are "Malaysia's Original People: Past, Present and Future of the Orang Asli" (page 82) and "Routledge Handbook of Contemporary Malaysia" (page 22), it clearly refers to the Malaysian Orang Asli as it states it there in its contents plainly. The other sources that I've cited in the article earlier that refers to the Sakai people from Indonesia are "Land, Law and Environment: Mythical Land, Legal Boundaries", "Orang Sakai di Riau: masyarakat terasing dalam masyarakat Indonesia : kajian mengenai perubahan dan kelestarian kebudayaan Sakai dalam proses transformasi mereka ke dalam masyarakat Indonesia melalui Proyek Pemulihan Pembinaan Kesejahteraan Masyarakat Terasing, Departemen Sosial, Republik Indonesia" and "Orang Sakai di Riau: Masyarakat Terasing dalam Masyarakat Indonesia". The Orang Asli Sakai that you've reference uses Aslian languages, while the Sakai from Indonesia uses a dialect closely related to the Minangkabau language. If you Google "suku Sakai Riau", you'll find that they're of a different ethnic group altogether from the Sakai of Malaysian Orang Asli. The name Sakai that was used in Malaysia is an older name used during the British colonial, and the current official name that's being used is Semang. If you check earlier edits that I've made in this article, you'll find that I did the same mistake as you too. For that reason, I've included a "for:" tag on top of the article to avoid confusion of the 2 ethnic groups. Therefore, my edits was not based on my "personal opinion" by throwing in sources simply without reading them. - Jeblat ( talk) 02:46, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | It is requested that an image or photograph of Sakai people (Indonesia) be
included in this article to
improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific
media request template where possible.
Wikipedians in Indonesia may be able to help! The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Hi @ Yosri:. In reference to your recent undo ( Special:Diff/864030107), based on the 2 sources that you've used are "Malaysia's Original People: Past, Present and Future of the Orang Asli" (page 82) and "Routledge Handbook of Contemporary Malaysia" (page 22), it clearly refers to the Malaysian Orang Asli as it states it there in its contents plainly. The other sources that I've cited in the article earlier that refers to the Sakai people from Indonesia are "Land, Law and Environment: Mythical Land, Legal Boundaries", "Orang Sakai di Riau: masyarakat terasing dalam masyarakat Indonesia : kajian mengenai perubahan dan kelestarian kebudayaan Sakai dalam proses transformasi mereka ke dalam masyarakat Indonesia melalui Proyek Pemulihan Pembinaan Kesejahteraan Masyarakat Terasing, Departemen Sosial, Republik Indonesia" and "Orang Sakai di Riau: Masyarakat Terasing dalam Masyarakat Indonesia". The Orang Asli Sakai that you've reference uses Aslian languages, while the Sakai from Indonesia uses a dialect closely related to the Minangkabau language. If you Google "suku Sakai Riau", you'll find that they're of a different ethnic group altogether from the Sakai of Malaysian Orang Asli. The name Sakai that was used in Malaysia is an older name used during the British colonial, and the current official name that's being used is Semang. If you check earlier edits that I've made in this article, you'll find that I did the same mistake as you too. For that reason, I've included a "for:" tag on top of the article to avoid confusion of the 2 ethnic groups. Therefore, my edits was not based on my "personal opinion" by throwing in sources simply without reading them. - Jeblat ( talk) 02:46, 15 October 2018 (UTC)