This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Sagarika Ghose article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Please merge this article. The two are the same person; Ghose-Sardesai is Sagarika's married name.
Rimi talk contribs 11:02, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
__ agree ___
should be merged, it is the same person — Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.95.211.255 ( talk • contribs) 09:02, 23 June 2007
User from the IP address 122.176.195.17 is indulging in excessive vandalism on this article by removing "Criticism on twitter" section repeatedly. Please block all edits from this IP address. This user has removed this section 5 times without any explanation. Hence, this user should be blocked from making further changes to this article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Corruptcongress ( talk • contribs) 21:30, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
CNN had in the past fired one of its journalist Octavia Nasr based on a controversial tweet. Was CNN acting based on an unreliable source? The logic that twitter is unreliable is preposterous.-- Corruptcongress ( talk) 03:27, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
I have protected the page for a while to allow parties to discuss the inclusion/exclusion of the twitter text. Five days of back and forth is no way to proceed - discuss on this talk page and decide what to do. But please bear in mind that this is a biography of a living person. Keith D ( talk) 14:04, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
Many people believe that below section should be included on Sagarika's page - Please suggest alternative wordings so that this section could be included on Sagarika's page. -- Corruptcongress ( talk) 14:10, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
I don't know very well whether it is the right place or not but i think Criticism on twitter regarding indian male comment should be included in the article. as it is real incident. -- Mihir_be_ce —Preceding undated comment added 10:29, 7 February 2011 (UTC).
CNN had in the past fired [7] one of its journalist Octavia Nasr based on a controversial tweet [8], however Sagarika Ghose continues to serve as the deputy editor and prime time anchor on the news network CNN-IBN.
Hi. This is Sagarika Ghose. This is to bring to your notice that a user is repeatedly inserting editorialised non factual content into my Wikipedia bio, such as I am perceived to be a "racist"", and "biased" anchor. These are not terms that have been placed on me by a court of law or by any established investigation. Anonymous internet users of a certain political ideology have long targeted me on different social media forums and are now inserting defamatory and editorialised content about me on the Wikipedia site. Please note that if such content continues to appear on the Wikipedia bio, I will be forced to lo0k at my legal options against what I consider defamation and public character assassination. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 14.98.57.107 ( talk) 17:02, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
Hi. This is Sagarika Ghose again. I logged on to my Wikipedia bio last night on 7-04-2013 to find that once again all the information had been removed and highly editorialised content had been inserted, including how I was being referred to as "bitch" in certain circles. I protest most strongly at the repeated editing and interference in my Wikipedia bio by vested interessts trying to detroy my professional credibility and my good name. This is not only sexual harassment on the web, it is also a form of molestation and stalking, both punishable offences in the new laws on crimes againt women. I have taken the liberty of re-inserting all the relevant professional and personal information about myself, information that I feel is factual, not motivated. The Wikipedia bio is referred to by many and urgent steps must be taken to protect public figures from repeated attempts at character assasination by anonymous criminals. Kindly ensure that steps are taken to so that any motivated person seeking to destroy my reputation does not repeatedly vandalise my bio!
Hi, this is Sagarika Ghose again. Once again an anonymous user inserted "She wears sleveless blouses and lipstick while anchoring on TV." A number of female anchors wear lipstick and saris on television. I find this kind of insertion of my dress not only gratuitous and sexist but once again an attempt by the same anonymous rightwingers seeking to destroy my professional credibility. Dress codes of television anchors are not normally mentioned in their Wikipedia bios. Have taken the liberty of removing it from the page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.176.221.237 ( talk) 11:51, 14 April 2013 (UTC)
It appears that subject is frequently editing the article through anon IP. I have informed Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard. neo ( talk) 07:19, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
Hi. This is Sagarika Ghose again. BBC News Asia has just reported that I am among the women journalists and activists who are targeted by hate messages on social media platforms like Twitter. I have inserted a line about the BBC report in my bio as it is possible that those who are attacking me on Twitter are the same forces who are repeatedly vandalising my Wikipedia bio. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.176.194.134 ( talk) 10:21, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
I have tagged the article with WP:POV and WP:COI as major contents of the article are from the subject itself and because of consistent threats or warnings or complaints by the subject on this talk page which has potential to keep users away from the article or influence them and which harm neutrality of the article and aim of the wikipedia. neo ( talk) 20:49, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi
This is Sagarika again. I now find that major chunks of my bio have been removed, such as the articles I've written and the stories I've covered. Has this been done by you or once again from the anonymous editor? If you compare what exists at the moment to the earlier version, you'll find that a lot of lines have been removed. Is this intentional? Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.176.194.134 ( talk) 19:33, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
On November 2011, in its Prime Time show (Face The Nation), the channel broadcasted a pre-recorded interview of Sri Sri Ravi Shankar as a live television debate. The show was hosted by the Deputy Editor of the channel, Sagarika Ghose, who also happens to be the wife of the channel's editor, Rajdeep Sardesai. On public outcry, the anchor issued a public apology on Twitter, web and TV. The episode broadcasted by the channel has not been hosted on the show's homepage.
Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CNN-IBN#Questions_on_ethics
Why shouldn't this controversy be included here as well since it basically revolved around her, for which she apologized too? Haresh 14:43, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi
This is Sagarika Ghose again. This is to bring to your notice a massive amount of biased content that has once again been inserted in my bio. The comments are clearly intended to damage my reputation by gratutious mention of Tweets and all manner of irrelevant comments. Hope you will kindly take note of these. I am taking the liberty of deleting them. Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.111.94.34 ( talk) 14:27, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
I think you need to read the section you blanked first, get the context and then apply the policies. Your comments above blankly quotes policies. You mean to say BBC, DNA, The Hindu, Hindustan Times, Indian Express, Rediff, are not reliable sources? I strongly disagree. Gmcssb ( talk) 00:00, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
Can we make a list of reliable and unreliable sources for the criticism section. I think most sources (BBC, Indian Express, The Hindu, CNN, Rediff, Shobha De, etc) are reliable and notable. Rather than blankly removing all criticism, would be better to discuss what to keep and what to remove. Criticism is not always a violation of BLP. Gmcssb ( talk) 22:30, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
All right - here is a list of points and sources in the earlier criticism section - see under http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Sagarika_Ghose&oldid=564425722#Controversies.2C_criticism_and_ridicule. Let us agree on which ones are notable and from reliable sources -
Please offer your comments on all of these. I will wait till end of the week. All criticism is not a violation of WP:BLP. If we are removing criticism as reported in BBC, Hindustan Times, The HIndu, Indian Express, then we are censoring Wikipedia. Gmcssb ( talk) 23:16, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
Here are my quick comments
Somebody needs to dig out sources on her life and career and add to the article. Gmcssb ( talk) 06:01, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
Mrs Ghose, please read WP:NLT before threatening legal action on wikipedia again. Darkness Shines ( talk) 12:35, 16 July 2013 (UTC) |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
Hi Wikipedia This is Sagarika Ghose again. Have read the Talk section and the points listed by whoever in trying to get my "tweets" added to my Wikipedia profile. What Wikipedia needs to understand is that there is an organized group of so called "nationalist Hindus" or Right- wing Hindus who despise everything I stand for, despise my journalism because it is too "liberal" for their tastes, despise liberals like me for being "soft" on minorities and want to paint us all as "anti-national traitors" who are hostile to the Hindu religion and hostile to the Hindu Right. As India enters an election year, these groups are on an over-drive in their all out offensive against liberal secular journalists, particularly women. In fact, there is an under-current of gender abuse and gender hatred in the campaign against me as well as against other so-called "liberal" women like political activist Kavita Krishnan, who was also mentioned in the BBC report, and who was threatened online by gang rape and stripping. Yes, I did coin the term "internet Hindus." But this did not create a "controversy", instead it was used as a peg for a debate by Al Jazeera TV and the term has now entered the lexicon of writing on these ultra nationalist extremist Hindu groups who operate on the internet under anonymous names. As for including my tweets on "ugly men", "easter eggs" and colours of the Indian flag, these are the fantastical ravings of a deranged mind, desperately casting around to find anything and everything to beat me with. I find it an act of appalling character assassination and damage to my reputation to allow such individuals and agencies to tamper with a public record of myself. Should such insertions continue, I will be forced to look at my legal options under sections of not only violating the modesty of a woman and her dignity in public but also stalking and criminal defamation. Since the writers are anonymous, Wikipedia would clearly be liable for such defamation. I strongly suggest that you only allow factual insertions, without any slanted editorial opinion on my tweets, or how much of a "controversy" I create, or how I am publicly "ridiculed". Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.176.3.36 ( talk) 10:52, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
|
So now Ms. Ghose is threatening to sue Wikipedia? And she decides what is to be written about her on Wikipedia?? Ms. Ghose, please read other biographies on Wikipedia and stop your conspiracy theories. And administrators like neo, despite agreeing that some criticism was "valid", are fine with the censorship of that "valid criticism" for around one week, as currently the article has no criticism at all? Is this not a clear violation of WP:CENSOR? I did not expect Wikipedia would do this. (I started a new section as the previous section was closed). If the administrators do not allow any criticism, even that which is reported by mainstream media sources, then I will have to raise this under dispute resolution noticeboard. Gmcssb ( talk) 22:13, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
Stop acting like a know-all, Sitush. Your tendency to push blatant anti-Hindu/communist/leftist agenda is all over articles on Wikipedia. People living in glass houses ... Huh! Gmcssb ( talk) 03:25, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
Hi Wikipedia This is Sagarika Ghose. Once again I find various slanted and highly editorialized comments being inserted into my bio. Such statements as "she has been accused of anti Hindu statements". The Twitter trend of #YoSagarikaso secular, are mentioned. Why on earth are these instances of harassment of me on the internet worthy of being included in my Wiki bio? Its clear that ideologically driven individuals with an axe to grind with me are inserting such derogatory and damning sentences. My so-called "anti Hindu slant" is their interpretation and can hardly be included as a fact. Wiki, kindly wake up to the repeated attacks that women perceived as "liberal" are being subject to on the internet. Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.176.162.98 ( talk) 17:04, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
Thank you Ugog. The repeated insertions on Twitter trends about me, my tweets, my perceived "biases" and my perceived attacks on religious nationalism, are in my opinion trivial and mischievous and not factual.There is no sourced article stating that I am guilty of such biases beyond highly opinionated blogs by certain vested interests. Issues of how I said "orange" instead of saffron, my tweets on easter eggs, on a legal dispute involving a temple, are all sourced from Twitter and seem born out of a perverse obsession with me and an all-consuming desire to character assassinate me. Many women journalists are subject to troll attacks on Twitter and it seems the trolls are also messing with my bio. regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.176.162.98 ( talk) 19:55, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
I added a point
" She is a frequent critic of social media masses(whom she likened to "swarm of bees" and "talentless elderly ladies who are furious that she is attractive" and "unenlightened hordes")"
With references
https://twitter.com/sagarikaghose/status/8141129179
https://twitter.com/sagarikaghose/status/499361342881406976
http://www.dnaindia.com/entertainment/report-most-of-my-critics-are-talentless-elderly-ladies-sagarika-ghose-1062473 Teja srinivas ( talk) 13:04, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
References
{{
cite news}}
: Check |url=
value (
help); Missing or empty |title=
(
help)
{{
cite news}}
: Check |url=
value (
help); Missing or empty |title=
(
help)
(moved from User talk:Ugog Nizdast#thankyou for guidance on 01:09, 10 April 2015 (UTC))
that was very informative ,,- the pages you directed me to. since im new and not much aware , i welcome your guidance and suggestion. i just added a topic "internet hindus" on one of your pages . since wikipedia is comprehensive , and extremely informative, i feel, mentioning of such an incident was necessary. that was just an addition,please dont see anything more than that. again im extremely thankful for those valuble comments. looking forward for your guidance ... Nurmengrad ( talk) 09:13, 9 April 2015 (UTC)nurmengrad
Dear Wikipedia. This is Sagarika Ghose. Unbelievable! Someone just changed my spouse to Yakub Memon, the convict recently hanged. Why are these changes allowed by Wikipedia? Have changed it back to my husband's name. Absolutely crazy and unacceptable. Thanks, Sagarika — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.176.164.107 ( talk) 05:44, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Sagarika Ghose. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 08:48, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Sagarika Ghose article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Please merge this article. The two are the same person; Ghose-Sardesai is Sagarika's married name.
Rimi talk contribs 11:02, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
__ agree ___
should be merged, it is the same person — Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.95.211.255 ( talk • contribs) 09:02, 23 June 2007
User from the IP address 122.176.195.17 is indulging in excessive vandalism on this article by removing "Criticism on twitter" section repeatedly. Please block all edits from this IP address. This user has removed this section 5 times without any explanation. Hence, this user should be blocked from making further changes to this article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Corruptcongress ( talk • contribs) 21:30, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
CNN had in the past fired one of its journalist Octavia Nasr based on a controversial tweet. Was CNN acting based on an unreliable source? The logic that twitter is unreliable is preposterous.-- Corruptcongress ( talk) 03:27, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
I have protected the page for a while to allow parties to discuss the inclusion/exclusion of the twitter text. Five days of back and forth is no way to proceed - discuss on this talk page and decide what to do. But please bear in mind that this is a biography of a living person. Keith D ( talk) 14:04, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
Many people believe that below section should be included on Sagarika's page - Please suggest alternative wordings so that this section could be included on Sagarika's page. -- Corruptcongress ( talk) 14:10, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
I don't know very well whether it is the right place or not but i think Criticism on twitter regarding indian male comment should be included in the article. as it is real incident. -- Mihir_be_ce —Preceding undated comment added 10:29, 7 February 2011 (UTC).
CNN had in the past fired [7] one of its journalist Octavia Nasr based on a controversial tweet [8], however Sagarika Ghose continues to serve as the deputy editor and prime time anchor on the news network CNN-IBN.
Hi. This is Sagarika Ghose. This is to bring to your notice that a user is repeatedly inserting editorialised non factual content into my Wikipedia bio, such as I am perceived to be a "racist"", and "biased" anchor. These are not terms that have been placed on me by a court of law or by any established investigation. Anonymous internet users of a certain political ideology have long targeted me on different social media forums and are now inserting defamatory and editorialised content about me on the Wikipedia site. Please note that if such content continues to appear on the Wikipedia bio, I will be forced to lo0k at my legal options against what I consider defamation and public character assassination. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 14.98.57.107 ( talk) 17:02, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
Hi. This is Sagarika Ghose again. I logged on to my Wikipedia bio last night on 7-04-2013 to find that once again all the information had been removed and highly editorialised content had been inserted, including how I was being referred to as "bitch" in certain circles. I protest most strongly at the repeated editing and interference in my Wikipedia bio by vested interessts trying to detroy my professional credibility and my good name. This is not only sexual harassment on the web, it is also a form of molestation and stalking, both punishable offences in the new laws on crimes againt women. I have taken the liberty of re-inserting all the relevant professional and personal information about myself, information that I feel is factual, not motivated. The Wikipedia bio is referred to by many and urgent steps must be taken to protect public figures from repeated attempts at character assasination by anonymous criminals. Kindly ensure that steps are taken to so that any motivated person seeking to destroy my reputation does not repeatedly vandalise my bio!
Hi, this is Sagarika Ghose again. Once again an anonymous user inserted "She wears sleveless blouses and lipstick while anchoring on TV." A number of female anchors wear lipstick and saris on television. I find this kind of insertion of my dress not only gratuitous and sexist but once again an attempt by the same anonymous rightwingers seeking to destroy my professional credibility. Dress codes of television anchors are not normally mentioned in their Wikipedia bios. Have taken the liberty of removing it from the page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.176.221.237 ( talk) 11:51, 14 April 2013 (UTC)
It appears that subject is frequently editing the article through anon IP. I have informed Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard. neo ( talk) 07:19, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
Hi. This is Sagarika Ghose again. BBC News Asia has just reported that I am among the women journalists and activists who are targeted by hate messages on social media platforms like Twitter. I have inserted a line about the BBC report in my bio as it is possible that those who are attacking me on Twitter are the same forces who are repeatedly vandalising my Wikipedia bio. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.176.194.134 ( talk) 10:21, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
I have tagged the article with WP:POV and WP:COI as major contents of the article are from the subject itself and because of consistent threats or warnings or complaints by the subject on this talk page which has potential to keep users away from the article or influence them and which harm neutrality of the article and aim of the wikipedia. neo ( talk) 20:49, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi
This is Sagarika again. I now find that major chunks of my bio have been removed, such as the articles I've written and the stories I've covered. Has this been done by you or once again from the anonymous editor? If you compare what exists at the moment to the earlier version, you'll find that a lot of lines have been removed. Is this intentional? Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.176.194.134 ( talk) 19:33, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
On November 2011, in its Prime Time show (Face The Nation), the channel broadcasted a pre-recorded interview of Sri Sri Ravi Shankar as a live television debate. The show was hosted by the Deputy Editor of the channel, Sagarika Ghose, who also happens to be the wife of the channel's editor, Rajdeep Sardesai. On public outcry, the anchor issued a public apology on Twitter, web and TV. The episode broadcasted by the channel has not been hosted on the show's homepage.
Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CNN-IBN#Questions_on_ethics
Why shouldn't this controversy be included here as well since it basically revolved around her, for which she apologized too? Haresh 14:43, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi
This is Sagarika Ghose again. This is to bring to your notice a massive amount of biased content that has once again been inserted in my bio. The comments are clearly intended to damage my reputation by gratutious mention of Tweets and all manner of irrelevant comments. Hope you will kindly take note of these. I am taking the liberty of deleting them. Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.111.94.34 ( talk) 14:27, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
I think you need to read the section you blanked first, get the context and then apply the policies. Your comments above blankly quotes policies. You mean to say BBC, DNA, The Hindu, Hindustan Times, Indian Express, Rediff, are not reliable sources? I strongly disagree. Gmcssb ( talk) 00:00, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
Can we make a list of reliable and unreliable sources for the criticism section. I think most sources (BBC, Indian Express, The Hindu, CNN, Rediff, Shobha De, etc) are reliable and notable. Rather than blankly removing all criticism, would be better to discuss what to keep and what to remove. Criticism is not always a violation of BLP. Gmcssb ( talk) 22:30, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
All right - here is a list of points and sources in the earlier criticism section - see under http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Sagarika_Ghose&oldid=564425722#Controversies.2C_criticism_and_ridicule. Let us agree on which ones are notable and from reliable sources -
Please offer your comments on all of these. I will wait till end of the week. All criticism is not a violation of WP:BLP. If we are removing criticism as reported in BBC, Hindustan Times, The HIndu, Indian Express, then we are censoring Wikipedia. Gmcssb ( talk) 23:16, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
Here are my quick comments
Somebody needs to dig out sources on her life and career and add to the article. Gmcssb ( talk) 06:01, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
Mrs Ghose, please read WP:NLT before threatening legal action on wikipedia again. Darkness Shines ( talk) 12:35, 16 July 2013 (UTC) |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
Hi Wikipedia This is Sagarika Ghose again. Have read the Talk section and the points listed by whoever in trying to get my "tweets" added to my Wikipedia profile. What Wikipedia needs to understand is that there is an organized group of so called "nationalist Hindus" or Right- wing Hindus who despise everything I stand for, despise my journalism because it is too "liberal" for their tastes, despise liberals like me for being "soft" on minorities and want to paint us all as "anti-national traitors" who are hostile to the Hindu religion and hostile to the Hindu Right. As India enters an election year, these groups are on an over-drive in their all out offensive against liberal secular journalists, particularly women. In fact, there is an under-current of gender abuse and gender hatred in the campaign against me as well as against other so-called "liberal" women like political activist Kavita Krishnan, who was also mentioned in the BBC report, and who was threatened online by gang rape and stripping. Yes, I did coin the term "internet Hindus." But this did not create a "controversy", instead it was used as a peg for a debate by Al Jazeera TV and the term has now entered the lexicon of writing on these ultra nationalist extremist Hindu groups who operate on the internet under anonymous names. As for including my tweets on "ugly men", "easter eggs" and colours of the Indian flag, these are the fantastical ravings of a deranged mind, desperately casting around to find anything and everything to beat me with. I find it an act of appalling character assassination and damage to my reputation to allow such individuals and agencies to tamper with a public record of myself. Should such insertions continue, I will be forced to look at my legal options under sections of not only violating the modesty of a woman and her dignity in public but also stalking and criminal defamation. Since the writers are anonymous, Wikipedia would clearly be liable for such defamation. I strongly suggest that you only allow factual insertions, without any slanted editorial opinion on my tweets, or how much of a "controversy" I create, or how I am publicly "ridiculed". Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.176.3.36 ( talk) 10:52, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
|
So now Ms. Ghose is threatening to sue Wikipedia? And she decides what is to be written about her on Wikipedia?? Ms. Ghose, please read other biographies on Wikipedia and stop your conspiracy theories. And administrators like neo, despite agreeing that some criticism was "valid", are fine with the censorship of that "valid criticism" for around one week, as currently the article has no criticism at all? Is this not a clear violation of WP:CENSOR? I did not expect Wikipedia would do this. (I started a new section as the previous section was closed). If the administrators do not allow any criticism, even that which is reported by mainstream media sources, then I will have to raise this under dispute resolution noticeboard. Gmcssb ( talk) 22:13, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
Stop acting like a know-all, Sitush. Your tendency to push blatant anti-Hindu/communist/leftist agenda is all over articles on Wikipedia. People living in glass houses ... Huh! Gmcssb ( talk) 03:25, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
Hi Wikipedia This is Sagarika Ghose. Once again I find various slanted and highly editorialized comments being inserted into my bio. Such statements as "she has been accused of anti Hindu statements". The Twitter trend of #YoSagarikaso secular, are mentioned. Why on earth are these instances of harassment of me on the internet worthy of being included in my Wiki bio? Its clear that ideologically driven individuals with an axe to grind with me are inserting such derogatory and damning sentences. My so-called "anti Hindu slant" is their interpretation and can hardly be included as a fact. Wiki, kindly wake up to the repeated attacks that women perceived as "liberal" are being subject to on the internet. Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.176.162.98 ( talk) 17:04, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
Thank you Ugog. The repeated insertions on Twitter trends about me, my tweets, my perceived "biases" and my perceived attacks on religious nationalism, are in my opinion trivial and mischievous and not factual.There is no sourced article stating that I am guilty of such biases beyond highly opinionated blogs by certain vested interests. Issues of how I said "orange" instead of saffron, my tweets on easter eggs, on a legal dispute involving a temple, are all sourced from Twitter and seem born out of a perverse obsession with me and an all-consuming desire to character assassinate me. Many women journalists are subject to troll attacks on Twitter and it seems the trolls are also messing with my bio. regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.176.162.98 ( talk) 19:55, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
I added a point
" She is a frequent critic of social media masses(whom she likened to "swarm of bees" and "talentless elderly ladies who are furious that she is attractive" and "unenlightened hordes")"
With references
https://twitter.com/sagarikaghose/status/8141129179
https://twitter.com/sagarikaghose/status/499361342881406976
http://www.dnaindia.com/entertainment/report-most-of-my-critics-are-talentless-elderly-ladies-sagarika-ghose-1062473 Teja srinivas ( talk) 13:04, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
References
{{
cite news}}
: Check |url=
value (
help); Missing or empty |title=
(
help)
{{
cite news}}
: Check |url=
value (
help); Missing or empty |title=
(
help)
(moved from User talk:Ugog Nizdast#thankyou for guidance on 01:09, 10 April 2015 (UTC))
that was very informative ,,- the pages you directed me to. since im new and not much aware , i welcome your guidance and suggestion. i just added a topic "internet hindus" on one of your pages . since wikipedia is comprehensive , and extremely informative, i feel, mentioning of such an incident was necessary. that was just an addition,please dont see anything more than that. again im extremely thankful for those valuble comments. looking forward for your guidance ... Nurmengrad ( talk) 09:13, 9 April 2015 (UTC)nurmengrad
Dear Wikipedia. This is Sagarika Ghose. Unbelievable! Someone just changed my spouse to Yakub Memon, the convict recently hanged. Why are these changes allowed by Wikipedia? Have changed it back to my husband's name. Absolutely crazy and unacceptable. Thanks, Sagarika — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.176.164.107 ( talk) 05:44, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Sagarika Ghose. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 08:48, 23 June 2016 (UTC)