![]() | This disambiguation page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
What happened to sac of Rome of 846?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arab_raid_against_Rome_%28846%29
Thank you
--
OxAO (
talk)
17:28, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
The Arab raid was one against the Vatican, which is outside the Walls of Rome. The inclusion of it on this page is disingenuous, misleading and factually inaccurate. Sleath56 ( talk) 03:44, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
If the Arab raid of 846 improperly called sack above should be listed on this page according to Fyhgfthj then shoudn't the page name be changed accordingly?
ICE77 ( talk) 01:50, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
846 : the arab sack of rome
In 846 the Aghlabids sacked Rome
They even sailed up the Tiber and sacked Rome in 846
Fyhgfthj, I read your and my initial comments again. It seems like you wanted to add the Arab 846 incursion on this page. My understanding was that the Arabs targeted the Vatican which was basically the same thing as Rome. Hence, you think the 846 indursion, whether labeled as Arab raid against Rome as it currently is or Arab sack of Rome, should be listed on this page. If that is the case I see your point. However, I see the raid is listed in the "See also" section right now and, at the same time, I also see links to "battles" and "sieges" so maybe the "raid" should be in its own page/category and not on this page to maintain consistency.
ICE77 ( talk) 01:01, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
Should the siege of Rome of 549–550 be part of this page which lists sacks of Rome?
![]() | This disambiguation page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
What happened to sac of Rome of 846?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arab_raid_against_Rome_%28846%29
Thank you
--
OxAO (
talk)
17:28, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
The Arab raid was one against the Vatican, which is outside the Walls of Rome. The inclusion of it on this page is disingenuous, misleading and factually inaccurate. Sleath56 ( talk) 03:44, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
If the Arab raid of 846 improperly called sack above should be listed on this page according to Fyhgfthj then shoudn't the page name be changed accordingly?
ICE77 ( talk) 01:50, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
846 : the arab sack of rome
In 846 the Aghlabids sacked Rome
They even sailed up the Tiber and sacked Rome in 846
Fyhgfthj, I read your and my initial comments again. It seems like you wanted to add the Arab 846 incursion on this page. My understanding was that the Arabs targeted the Vatican which was basically the same thing as Rome. Hence, you think the 846 indursion, whether labeled as Arab raid against Rome as it currently is or Arab sack of Rome, should be listed on this page. If that is the case I see your point. However, I see the raid is listed in the "See also" section right now and, at the same time, I also see links to "battles" and "sieges" so maybe the "raid" should be in its own page/category and not on this page to maintain consistency.
ICE77 ( talk) 01:01, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
Should the siege of Rome of 549–550 be part of this page which lists sacks of Rome?