This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on April 12, 2012, April 12, 2013, April 12, 2015, and April 12, 2016. |
To standardize the article titles this should probably be Siege of Constantinople (1204), but that seems to be a redirect. Perhaps someone who knows how to undo a redirect can fix this. ChildofMidnight ( talk) 18:38, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
This article needs coverage improvement in order to achieve a higher classification - see note in B class checklist. That there is nothing on the siege itself, only the storm and aftermath, is a major problem. Monstrelet ( talk) 09:01, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
This article has less content than the section on the siege of Constantinople in the Fourth Crusade article. I don't see a reason for a "detail" article on this episode in the 4th crusade, when it has less information than the overview article. Let's just make this a redirect to Fourth Crusade#Diversion to Constantinople.
If not that, then we should just copy the text and figures from that article here. Geoffrey.landis ( talk) 14:43, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
if you look at the siege of constantinople in italian it says that the bronze horses in venice are copies of the others stolen during this siege. sorry for my english. bye! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.32.178.67 ( talk) 11:14, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
While the quaint apology and acceptance are noteworthy I suppose, the REAL legacy was the weakening of the empire and more specifically the city to Turkish aggression. Many RS's are available on this point and should be noted. HammerFilmFan ( talk) 15:38, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
This article insists the theory that the Crusaders and Venetians sacked Constantinople in 1204 as retribution for the 1182 Massacre of the Latins is entirely factual, but I'm almost certain the massacre was used as a pretense for the Normans sacking Thessalonica in 1185, and not as a justification for a crusade directed at conquering the Byzantine Empire. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Themyth27 ( talk • contribs) 18:18, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on April 12, 2012, April 12, 2013, April 12, 2015, and April 12, 2016. |
To standardize the article titles this should probably be Siege of Constantinople (1204), but that seems to be a redirect. Perhaps someone who knows how to undo a redirect can fix this. ChildofMidnight ( talk) 18:38, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
This article needs coverage improvement in order to achieve a higher classification - see note in B class checklist. That there is nothing on the siege itself, only the storm and aftermath, is a major problem. Monstrelet ( talk) 09:01, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
This article has less content than the section on the siege of Constantinople in the Fourth Crusade article. I don't see a reason for a "detail" article on this episode in the 4th crusade, when it has less information than the overview article. Let's just make this a redirect to Fourth Crusade#Diversion to Constantinople.
If not that, then we should just copy the text and figures from that article here. Geoffrey.landis ( talk) 14:43, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
if you look at the siege of constantinople in italian it says that the bronze horses in venice are copies of the others stolen during this siege. sorry for my english. bye! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.32.178.67 ( talk) 11:14, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
While the quaint apology and acceptance are noteworthy I suppose, the REAL legacy was the weakening of the empire and more specifically the city to Turkish aggression. Many RS's are available on this point and should be noted. HammerFilmFan ( talk) 15:38, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
This article insists the theory that the Crusaders and Venetians sacked Constantinople in 1204 as retribution for the 1182 Massacre of the Latins is entirely factual, but I'm almost certain the massacre was used as a pretense for the Normans sacking Thessalonica in 1185, and not as a justification for a crusade directed at conquering the Byzantine Empire. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Themyth27 ( talk • contribs) 18:18, 19 July 2020 (UTC)