This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Needs updating it say will will be in 2006 and attempt again in May in Germany which failed at 240 MPH Uber555 03:40, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
This page is basically about one thing. The effort SSC is making to create the car that will go faster than the Veyron.
It's tongue in cheek promotion and exagerates the importance of this car in automotive history. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.41.244.210 ( talk) 19:16, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
I'm quite curious, it looks like a Lamborghini Diablo replica kit car, with Ford Focus (?) headlights. 60.50.48.148 17:29, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
Eh, let's see what it can do in Germany on VW's five mile straight. Beat the Bugatti on its home turf. Since it is a German Car underneath it all. Titmanisdaman 20:10, 19 December 2007
It says that "SSC claims that the car can accelerate from 0-180 mph in 2.5 secs." and then citation needed. That's 6 times faster than the McClaren F1 and I seriously doubt that that information is correct. Maybe the author of that bit meant 180 kph, not mph.
Afunyun ( talk) 05:41, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
Please read the entire article you referenced for 'world's fastest production car' before you post the SSC as such next time, even in the article it states "The data, collected by Dewetron's world-renowned GPS tracking system, will be verified by Guinness before the Ultimate Aero is officially crowned the "World's Fastest Production Car."" Therefore I have removed the reference, for now. There are also questions about whether or not the SSC Aero qualifies as a "production car" based on claims that the car is A) not street legal, and B) has few if any units sold. —Preceding unsigned comment added by RTShadow ( talk • contribs) 23:16, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
It is oct. 11, and Guinness has made it official. It is the fastest. In regards to that, I think the article needs a bit of cleaning, especially in the 'Speed Attempt' section. So much for my Bugatti fanboyism :)
For the sake of fairness, keep in mind that Veyron does go as fast as 407.6 kmph, not 378 kmph as stated in the article. I have just witnessed this with my eyes. Also, how reliable are data produced by the car manufacturer? Isn't it supposed to be INDEPENDENT testing?
As of "Bugatti fanboyism", the cars are incomperable. Speed record version of Aero is nothing but a stripped production version, aimed at one and only goal - prove American muscle once again. I have not seen them stripping anything off Veyron to go for 407 kmph. All the luxury was stil there. Oranges and apples, oranges and apples. 76.104.253.138 ( talk) 01:33, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
Spec Version that did the test : 2006 Number sold : 0
Current and 2007 spec is heavier and so is unproven to do this speed ... lɘɘяɘM яɘɫƨɐƮ 11:17, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
Shouldn't this article be in US Standard units with the metric units in parentheses as the car is American made? -- 134.173.56.209 ( talk) 08:10, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
bugatti have no problemos with putting there car on a streight (NO MODIFICATION!) and it'll hit its top speed! the aero is a dif matter, it takes time, and its only happened a few times, plus u saw it with your own eyes?, its a fact that no one has actully been in the car whilst its been doing the speed runs (inderpentdant ajudicators!), to be honest, they have paid guinesse wold of record some money so there's can be the fastest. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.154.180.53 ( talk) 19:09, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
I think SI should be primary as this not US-specific topic (although the vehicle was produced in the US). It has world significance because of its record and that's why SI should be primary. SkyBon Talk/ Contributions 14:06, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
I don't know much about cars but it seems to me that '6.2-litre (387.4 cu. in.)' and '6.35-litre (387.2 cu. in.)' are conflicting values. As 6.35 litres is greater than 6.2 litres, the cu. in. values should represent that. However, the second cu. in. value is lower than the first. Any explanation/thoughts? PookeyMaster ( talk) 09:42, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
The official site references 4.125" x 3.620" which is indeed 6.35 litres or 387.24 cu in. However, the site (and this page by citation) also quotes impossible torque and gearing figures -- if the car is producing 1094 ft lbs of torque at 6150 rpm, it is producing 1281 hp at that same speed! Going from the 1183 hp figure, the engine is producing 893 ft lbs at 6950 rpm, so a peak of 920-950 at 6150 rpm would be most likely. And on the gearing: the site's 0.6452/3.44 gearing and 335/30ZR20 tyres would produce a top speed of 218mph at 7200 rpm. A final drive of around 2.7 would produce the speeds the car is reputed to make. The numbers they quote (0.357 cd, 1183hp, etc) would produce a car which is technically capable of the 273mph they talk about a lot. Whether or not the numbers are accurate is up to them. TNC ( talk) 23:50, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
The only place in this article that it is mentioned that the car is street legal, is in the category box thingy at the bottom.
Is the car street legal? Is this verified? MSNBC thinks it is, but I'm not convinced.
Yes, it is. I just took a picture of one today outside of Microsoft's Studio-A building in Redmond, WA and it had WA State license plat # 0792 A — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.125.136.105 ( talk) 06:32, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
Someone re-add them. They are useful pieces of information. Malamockq ( talk) 01:59, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
"The first run clocked 257.41 mph (414.26 km/h) and the return trip 254.88 mph (410.19 km/h), with the average beating the Bugatti Veyron's speed by 235 mph (378.2 km/h). The results of this test, verified by Guinness World Records on October 9, 2007, gave the SSC Ultimate Aero the title of world's fastest production car."
Not sure what that's supposed to say but it's wrong. 98.223.170.167 ( talk) 00:39, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
Unless I'm doing the math wrong, the average of 257.41 and 254.88 is not 257.15 Barhamd ( talk) 08:14, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
Large sections of this article are copied verbatim fromt eh companies website. Unless there is some justification for this this article is a copyright violation and should be put up for deletion. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 150.203.183.146 ( talk) 01:36, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
That's silly. Not only is it obviously mid engined just by looking at it, but it's also clearly listed as such on SSC's own page here:
http://www.shelbysupercars.com/car-specs.php
Don't see why something that obvious needs a citation, but it is verifiable if necessary. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.168.220.112 ( talk) 06:26, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
The Weber F1 only claims to be faster than the Ultimate Aero. This fact has not been officially recorded. The status should remain incumbent until such time that it is officially not. If we go by claimed top speed, then the Aero should be fastest with an estimated top speed of 434 km/h. As far as I'm concerned, the only supercar to ever reach its estimated top speed is the Bugatti Veyron, and that car costs the company 2 million pounds. Anybody? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sinfulparade ( talk • contribs) 08:19, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
Somebody needs to stop people from posting the Weber F1 as being the fastest street-legal car in the world. This fact has not been verified. And where did the 2009 specs go?? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sinfulparade ( talk • contribs) 07:40, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
Shouldn't we put images in this article? The other super fast cars (McLaren F1, Bugatti Veyron, etc.) have pictures of them. Why not this? It wastes time to look at this then google the images, so we might as well put some here. FstrthnU ( talk) 02:28, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
We already seen cars like the Bugatti Veyron and the Ferrari FXX (so exclusive this last one, that Ferrari doesn't give it to you, even if you buy it!!), on TV programs like BBC's Topgear...
What I ask is this... Why don't the people responsible by the conception of the SSC Ultimate Aero, loan one of those cars to a reputable TV motor show like the mentioned "Topgear"?
If everyone is so sure that thge car is that fast, what is keeping you? Face it... Until it gets done, more and more people will question the claimed top speed. As far as I'm concerned, a Guinness World Records certificate isn't a credible evidence. You can buy everything these days with the right amount of cash.
Let's think about it, shall we? After we saw the VW guys, cracking their heads over and over again with the Veyron, for years going back to square one, how can a car like the SSC Ultimate Aero, with a 1990's design, with almost 1200 bhp on two wheels alone, on a road instead of a race track, could achieve such a speed? I mean, look at the McLaren F1... When the guy reached 375 kph, the car almost seemed to desintegrate! The driver thought that he should stop the car... The McLaren F1 doesn't even have 700 bhp!! And the CCR?? It's scary when your reach the 390 kph!! Either the Volkswagen guys in Germany didn't find the best engineers (because they were working in the USA!!), or all this about the SSC Ultimate Aero is just a publicity stunt for a small car manufacturer... Which is it? Still waiting for the answer, because there's something about this that doesn't seem right... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.243.119.111 ( talk) 21:49, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
Simple. Americans engineers are smarter than the German ones. Bill Heller ( talk) 12:06, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
Not anymore, apparently. 124.168.45.4 ( talk) 16:14, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
this section doesn't contain any sources and isn't NPOV in the least. here are a few examples... "...that according to some do not seem credible or even feasible." no source
"Jeremy Clarkson said that the test driver was "a 71 year old man", and that he does not believe that the car really is better than the Bugatti Veyron." no source, irrelevent
"Some critics do admit the possibility that the car does indeed live up to the Guinness World of Records certificate..." who?
"...but that does not in any way mean the car is better than the Veyron." irrelevent, not NPOV, out right opinionated
...etc., etc. further more, the last claim... "In spite of all doubts and criticisms and the way these are qualified, it is true however that the SSC Ultimate Aero has never been shown on camera and under credible circumstances (such as having its speed measured by a GPS tachometer) reaching the claimed speed." ...is NOT true. a video of the run, as well as the telemetry of the run, can be found HERE. the telemetry was gathered by a Dewetron GPS data aquisition system, as confirmed HERE. also, this is the SAME GPS data aquisition system used by Top Gear during James May's Bugatti Veyron top speed run, as confirmed HERE. this proof pretty much dismisses this section entirely, and i don't think that it would be a stretch to say that there are some fanboys here that are a little disappointed about the Veyron being beat by this 'lowely' small time american manufacturer or something.
BTW, i'm not exactly a wiki-expert here, so my appologies if i didn't do everything perfectly. either way though, i believe i made my point. Ry Trapp0 ( talk) 09:03, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
I'm surprised people are still arguing about this crap. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
98.111.150.86 (
talk)
16:01, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
Well in that case the Mclaren F1 (242mph) is top and then the Koeniggsegg CCR [?] (240mph). Spinodontosaurus ( talk) 18:57, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
This bit seems rather opinionated and is uncited:
How can you remove the heating, the boot (?), and what effect will removing the radio have on the 250mph+ top speed of a 2 tonne car? Complete nonsense, and anyway even if it did make a difference, that's not the point as the Veyron has all those things so it's silly to speculate what sped it could get. And where was this "controversy" anyway? Unless it is cited this sentence will be removed shortly. Feudonym ( talk) 09:15, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
So what you people are saying is that your not convinced until Top Gear drives the car right? You remind me of the birthers. Though I would love to see Top Gear drive the Aero.-- Arm ( talk) 06:58, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
What on earth is that all about? Mr Larrington ( talk) 15:55, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
the page says this car has a 10 liters three turbo W18 engine... it's obviously a silly joke: it's a car, not a lorry. AFAIK in the real world the car has a 6.2 liters twin turbo V8
Someone has added article regarding SSC Aero II whose name is not yet officially unveiled. Also, the article is total copy and paste from topgear website with future references like it will rev to 9000rpm etc. This article should be rephrased in present sentence with the claims of company rather then complete copy and paste.
If none of the claims have been verified, is it appropriate at all to include them in something that desires to appear like an encyclopedia? 124.168.16.94 ( talk) 11:22, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
An image used in this article,
File:Ssc-ultimate-aero.jpg, has been deleted from
Wikimedia Commons by
Adrignola for the following reason: Missing
essential information such as
license,
permission or source
| |
A different bot should have (or will soon) remove the image code from the article text (check if this has been done correctly). If you think the image deletion was in error please raise the issue at Commons. You could also try to
search for new images to replace the old one.
This notification is provided by a Bot, currently under trial -- CommonsNotification ( talk) 20:01, 6 May 2011 (UTC) |
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
SSC Aero. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 03:21, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Needs updating it say will will be in 2006 and attempt again in May in Germany which failed at 240 MPH Uber555 03:40, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
This page is basically about one thing. The effort SSC is making to create the car that will go faster than the Veyron.
It's tongue in cheek promotion and exagerates the importance of this car in automotive history. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.41.244.210 ( talk) 19:16, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
I'm quite curious, it looks like a Lamborghini Diablo replica kit car, with Ford Focus (?) headlights. 60.50.48.148 17:29, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
Eh, let's see what it can do in Germany on VW's five mile straight. Beat the Bugatti on its home turf. Since it is a German Car underneath it all. Titmanisdaman 20:10, 19 December 2007
It says that "SSC claims that the car can accelerate from 0-180 mph in 2.5 secs." and then citation needed. That's 6 times faster than the McClaren F1 and I seriously doubt that that information is correct. Maybe the author of that bit meant 180 kph, not mph.
Afunyun ( talk) 05:41, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
Please read the entire article you referenced for 'world's fastest production car' before you post the SSC as such next time, even in the article it states "The data, collected by Dewetron's world-renowned GPS tracking system, will be verified by Guinness before the Ultimate Aero is officially crowned the "World's Fastest Production Car."" Therefore I have removed the reference, for now. There are also questions about whether or not the SSC Aero qualifies as a "production car" based on claims that the car is A) not street legal, and B) has few if any units sold. —Preceding unsigned comment added by RTShadow ( talk • contribs) 23:16, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
It is oct. 11, and Guinness has made it official. It is the fastest. In regards to that, I think the article needs a bit of cleaning, especially in the 'Speed Attempt' section. So much for my Bugatti fanboyism :)
For the sake of fairness, keep in mind that Veyron does go as fast as 407.6 kmph, not 378 kmph as stated in the article. I have just witnessed this with my eyes. Also, how reliable are data produced by the car manufacturer? Isn't it supposed to be INDEPENDENT testing?
As of "Bugatti fanboyism", the cars are incomperable. Speed record version of Aero is nothing but a stripped production version, aimed at one and only goal - prove American muscle once again. I have not seen them stripping anything off Veyron to go for 407 kmph. All the luxury was stil there. Oranges and apples, oranges and apples. 76.104.253.138 ( talk) 01:33, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
Spec Version that did the test : 2006 Number sold : 0
Current and 2007 spec is heavier and so is unproven to do this speed ... lɘɘяɘM яɘɫƨɐƮ 11:17, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
Shouldn't this article be in US Standard units with the metric units in parentheses as the car is American made? -- 134.173.56.209 ( talk) 08:10, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
bugatti have no problemos with putting there car on a streight (NO MODIFICATION!) and it'll hit its top speed! the aero is a dif matter, it takes time, and its only happened a few times, plus u saw it with your own eyes?, its a fact that no one has actully been in the car whilst its been doing the speed runs (inderpentdant ajudicators!), to be honest, they have paid guinesse wold of record some money so there's can be the fastest. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.154.180.53 ( talk) 19:09, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
I think SI should be primary as this not US-specific topic (although the vehicle was produced in the US). It has world significance because of its record and that's why SI should be primary. SkyBon Talk/ Contributions 14:06, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
I don't know much about cars but it seems to me that '6.2-litre (387.4 cu. in.)' and '6.35-litre (387.2 cu. in.)' are conflicting values. As 6.35 litres is greater than 6.2 litres, the cu. in. values should represent that. However, the second cu. in. value is lower than the first. Any explanation/thoughts? PookeyMaster ( talk) 09:42, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
The official site references 4.125" x 3.620" which is indeed 6.35 litres or 387.24 cu in. However, the site (and this page by citation) also quotes impossible torque and gearing figures -- if the car is producing 1094 ft lbs of torque at 6150 rpm, it is producing 1281 hp at that same speed! Going from the 1183 hp figure, the engine is producing 893 ft lbs at 6950 rpm, so a peak of 920-950 at 6150 rpm would be most likely. And on the gearing: the site's 0.6452/3.44 gearing and 335/30ZR20 tyres would produce a top speed of 218mph at 7200 rpm. A final drive of around 2.7 would produce the speeds the car is reputed to make. The numbers they quote (0.357 cd, 1183hp, etc) would produce a car which is technically capable of the 273mph they talk about a lot. Whether or not the numbers are accurate is up to them. TNC ( talk) 23:50, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
The only place in this article that it is mentioned that the car is street legal, is in the category box thingy at the bottom.
Is the car street legal? Is this verified? MSNBC thinks it is, but I'm not convinced.
Yes, it is. I just took a picture of one today outside of Microsoft's Studio-A building in Redmond, WA and it had WA State license plat # 0792 A — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.125.136.105 ( talk) 06:32, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
Someone re-add them. They are useful pieces of information. Malamockq ( talk) 01:59, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
"The first run clocked 257.41 mph (414.26 km/h) and the return trip 254.88 mph (410.19 km/h), with the average beating the Bugatti Veyron's speed by 235 mph (378.2 km/h). The results of this test, verified by Guinness World Records on October 9, 2007, gave the SSC Ultimate Aero the title of world's fastest production car."
Not sure what that's supposed to say but it's wrong. 98.223.170.167 ( talk) 00:39, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
Unless I'm doing the math wrong, the average of 257.41 and 254.88 is not 257.15 Barhamd ( talk) 08:14, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
Large sections of this article are copied verbatim fromt eh companies website. Unless there is some justification for this this article is a copyright violation and should be put up for deletion. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 150.203.183.146 ( talk) 01:36, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
That's silly. Not only is it obviously mid engined just by looking at it, but it's also clearly listed as such on SSC's own page here:
http://www.shelbysupercars.com/car-specs.php
Don't see why something that obvious needs a citation, but it is verifiable if necessary. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.168.220.112 ( talk) 06:26, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
The Weber F1 only claims to be faster than the Ultimate Aero. This fact has not been officially recorded. The status should remain incumbent until such time that it is officially not. If we go by claimed top speed, then the Aero should be fastest with an estimated top speed of 434 km/h. As far as I'm concerned, the only supercar to ever reach its estimated top speed is the Bugatti Veyron, and that car costs the company 2 million pounds. Anybody? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sinfulparade ( talk • contribs) 08:19, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
Somebody needs to stop people from posting the Weber F1 as being the fastest street-legal car in the world. This fact has not been verified. And where did the 2009 specs go?? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sinfulparade ( talk • contribs) 07:40, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
Shouldn't we put images in this article? The other super fast cars (McLaren F1, Bugatti Veyron, etc.) have pictures of them. Why not this? It wastes time to look at this then google the images, so we might as well put some here. FstrthnU ( talk) 02:28, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
We already seen cars like the Bugatti Veyron and the Ferrari FXX (so exclusive this last one, that Ferrari doesn't give it to you, even if you buy it!!), on TV programs like BBC's Topgear...
What I ask is this... Why don't the people responsible by the conception of the SSC Ultimate Aero, loan one of those cars to a reputable TV motor show like the mentioned "Topgear"?
If everyone is so sure that thge car is that fast, what is keeping you? Face it... Until it gets done, more and more people will question the claimed top speed. As far as I'm concerned, a Guinness World Records certificate isn't a credible evidence. You can buy everything these days with the right amount of cash.
Let's think about it, shall we? After we saw the VW guys, cracking their heads over and over again with the Veyron, for years going back to square one, how can a car like the SSC Ultimate Aero, with a 1990's design, with almost 1200 bhp on two wheels alone, on a road instead of a race track, could achieve such a speed? I mean, look at the McLaren F1... When the guy reached 375 kph, the car almost seemed to desintegrate! The driver thought that he should stop the car... The McLaren F1 doesn't even have 700 bhp!! And the CCR?? It's scary when your reach the 390 kph!! Either the Volkswagen guys in Germany didn't find the best engineers (because they were working in the USA!!), or all this about the SSC Ultimate Aero is just a publicity stunt for a small car manufacturer... Which is it? Still waiting for the answer, because there's something about this that doesn't seem right... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.243.119.111 ( talk) 21:49, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
Simple. Americans engineers are smarter than the German ones. Bill Heller ( talk) 12:06, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
Not anymore, apparently. 124.168.45.4 ( talk) 16:14, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
this section doesn't contain any sources and isn't NPOV in the least. here are a few examples... "...that according to some do not seem credible or even feasible." no source
"Jeremy Clarkson said that the test driver was "a 71 year old man", and that he does not believe that the car really is better than the Bugatti Veyron." no source, irrelevent
"Some critics do admit the possibility that the car does indeed live up to the Guinness World of Records certificate..." who?
"...but that does not in any way mean the car is better than the Veyron." irrelevent, not NPOV, out right opinionated
...etc., etc. further more, the last claim... "In spite of all doubts and criticisms and the way these are qualified, it is true however that the SSC Ultimate Aero has never been shown on camera and under credible circumstances (such as having its speed measured by a GPS tachometer) reaching the claimed speed." ...is NOT true. a video of the run, as well as the telemetry of the run, can be found HERE. the telemetry was gathered by a Dewetron GPS data aquisition system, as confirmed HERE. also, this is the SAME GPS data aquisition system used by Top Gear during James May's Bugatti Veyron top speed run, as confirmed HERE. this proof pretty much dismisses this section entirely, and i don't think that it would be a stretch to say that there are some fanboys here that are a little disappointed about the Veyron being beat by this 'lowely' small time american manufacturer or something.
BTW, i'm not exactly a wiki-expert here, so my appologies if i didn't do everything perfectly. either way though, i believe i made my point. Ry Trapp0 ( talk) 09:03, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
I'm surprised people are still arguing about this crap. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
98.111.150.86 (
talk)
16:01, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
Well in that case the Mclaren F1 (242mph) is top and then the Koeniggsegg CCR [?] (240mph). Spinodontosaurus ( talk) 18:57, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
This bit seems rather opinionated and is uncited:
How can you remove the heating, the boot (?), and what effect will removing the radio have on the 250mph+ top speed of a 2 tonne car? Complete nonsense, and anyway even if it did make a difference, that's not the point as the Veyron has all those things so it's silly to speculate what sped it could get. And where was this "controversy" anyway? Unless it is cited this sentence will be removed shortly. Feudonym ( talk) 09:15, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
So what you people are saying is that your not convinced until Top Gear drives the car right? You remind me of the birthers. Though I would love to see Top Gear drive the Aero.-- Arm ( talk) 06:58, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
What on earth is that all about? Mr Larrington ( talk) 15:55, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
the page says this car has a 10 liters three turbo W18 engine... it's obviously a silly joke: it's a car, not a lorry. AFAIK in the real world the car has a 6.2 liters twin turbo V8
Someone has added article regarding SSC Aero II whose name is not yet officially unveiled. Also, the article is total copy and paste from topgear website with future references like it will rev to 9000rpm etc. This article should be rephrased in present sentence with the claims of company rather then complete copy and paste.
If none of the claims have been verified, is it appropriate at all to include them in something that desires to appear like an encyclopedia? 124.168.16.94 ( talk) 11:22, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
An image used in this article,
File:Ssc-ultimate-aero.jpg, has been deleted from
Wikimedia Commons by
Adrignola for the following reason: Missing
essential information such as
license,
permission or source
| |
A different bot should have (or will soon) remove the image code from the article text (check if this has been done correctly). If you think the image deletion was in error please raise the issue at Commons. You could also try to
search for new images to replace the old one.
This notification is provided by a Bot, currently under trial -- CommonsNotification ( talk) 20:01, 6 May 2011 (UTC) |
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
SSC Aero. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 03:21, 14 January 2016 (UTC)