From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

bot had a false positive, but it looks impossible to report it

The document is real, and posses a big problem for this company... It might be unwanted by the SBM board, but why is this unwanted on wikipedia ?

the way to report the "false positive" on the bot-site is not working at all, the safety-measure is to extreme and after ten attempts I gave up...

1947enkidu ( talk) 08:40, 7 February 2014 (UTC) reply

The reason is, quite simply, that this is not appropriate location for that document. Without considering the details of the document (which does, though, appear to have been verified) Wikipedia contains articles about topics, not individual documents relating to their activities. -- AlisonW ( talk) 11:38, 10 February 2014 (UTC) reply
Who could be hiding behind the name SBMO, it looks it could be someone working at the firm... The firm is probably not "pleased" with the revelations ? 1947enkidu ( talk) 20:03, 10 February 2014 (UTC) reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 21:38, 18 August 2021 (UTC) reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 04:08, 19 August 2021 (UTC) reply

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

bot had a false positive, but it looks impossible to report it

The document is real, and posses a big problem for this company... It might be unwanted by the SBM board, but why is this unwanted on wikipedia ?

the way to report the "false positive" on the bot-site is not working at all, the safety-measure is to extreme and after ten attempts I gave up...

1947enkidu ( talk) 08:40, 7 February 2014 (UTC) reply

The reason is, quite simply, that this is not appropriate location for that document. Without considering the details of the document (which does, though, appear to have been verified) Wikipedia contains articles about topics, not individual documents relating to their activities. -- AlisonW ( talk) 11:38, 10 February 2014 (UTC) reply
Who could be hiding behind the name SBMO, it looks it could be someone working at the firm... The firm is probably not "pleased" with the revelations ? 1947enkidu ( talk) 20:03, 10 February 2014 (UTC) reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 21:38, 18 August 2021 (UTC) reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 04:08, 19 August 2021 (UTC) reply


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook