Russula densifolia has been listed as one of the
Natural sciences good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: October 21, 2013. ( Reviewed version). |
A fact from Russula densifolia appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 28 October 2013 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: J Milburn ( talk · contribs) 10:03, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
Generally very strong, just a couple of nitpicks:
Sources generally look great- well done on digging up those obscure non-English journals! Pictures are excellent. No issues with stability, NPOV etc. J Milburn ( talk) 10:03, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
Russula densifolia has been listed as one of the
Natural sciences good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: October 21, 2013. ( Reviewed version). |
A fact from Russula densifolia appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 28 October 2013 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: J Milburn ( talk · contribs) 10:03, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
Generally very strong, just a couple of nitpicks:
Sources generally look great- well done on digging up those obscure non-English journals! Pictures are excellent. No issues with stability, NPOV etc. J Milburn ( talk) 10:03, 20 October 2013 (UTC)