Rushmore (film) has been listed as one of the
Media and drama good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: November 26, 2019. ( Reviewed version). |
Rushmore (film) received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article. |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
The budget info, like the rest of the Technical data, was taken from IMDb. [1] -- LGagnon 00:12, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
Seems like it might be time to start referencing our data? I was able to find this site with a reference to the Brand New song fact that we need a reference for, but even though it looks like a news article, it's a student paper.-- Hurtstotouchfire 09:41, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
I do not agree with this article's suggestion that the film concludes with Max accepting his relationship with Miss Cross as a friendship. In fact, I would argue the counter. The movie is essentially what Max portrays it to be. It is his "play." He, in my opinions, "ends up" with Miss Cross given the ending. I think the article should be less specific about the ending and its meaning and slightly more open to other perspectives. Opinions? Abacab 06:39, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
I absolutely disagree. the movie is not what max "portrays it to be" the film is about his coming of age and independence as a man. At the end of the film he has matured and accepted his natural role in life as an artist, and a young man. He has margaret chang. he is friends with blume again. and he takes rosemary's hand and dances with her as an acceptance and a farewell to all the previous troubles. he even sets up blume and rosemary in the audience and trys to put them back together by having blume try and build the aquarium again for her as a reconciliation.
VanTucky
06:56, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
You're right that Max matures and accepts a great deal, but there's a definite indication of the same old manipulative Max when he has the DJ put on a specially chosen and especially sentimental song (save lyrics) for his dance with Miss Cross. Certainly, scheming to reconcile Blume with Cross indicates that he does not intend to pursue her (and hence I disagree with the Abacab that he "ends up" with Cross), I think this subtle touch (directing the DJ) indicates that Max will never fully "accept his role in life". If he did, there would be no hope for any of us.
But more pertinently, with respect to editing, the claim that Max accepts his relatinoship with Cross as Platonic is someone's personal interpretation and not factual. (And by the way, it's 'Yang', not 'Chang'. God, watch the movie! :) )
82.45.161.53
20:45, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
I'm removing it for the second time. While it might be interesting to fans of the film, there's really no reason for it to be in this article ( Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information). Please present an argument for why it should be included before reinserting it. Pele Merengue 17:00, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 19:43, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
I hope I have added content that is interesting, but really need some feedback. I'd like to become a valued contributor, so any constructive criticism of what I've done so far will be welcomed by me. I also intend to spend time reading various tutorials..... Any comments you have to help would be greatly appreciated. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Martin1231 ( talk • contribs) 23:51, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
- Here are some links to articles and reviews to help beef up this article.-- J.D. ( talk) 19:31, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
- another article to use.-- J.D. ( talk) 20:32, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
This section is unsourced and in list form. I've moved it here until it can be cited properly and placed in the appropriate sections in the article.-- J.D. ( talk) 19:27, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
References
This section is unsourced and in list form. I've moved it here until it can be cited properly and placed in the appropriate sections in the article.-- J.D. ( talk) 19:41, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
set anywhere in partic? max meets mrs blume in a kinda big city. just wondering. n-dimensional §кakkl€ 19:41, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
Is 404'ed. I don't want to remove the link, as #6 is use several times throughout the article. I did try to (very briefly) to find it again, w/ out any luck. I guess if I ever get back around to this article I'll delete it. Greg343 ( talk) 08:40, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
Hello. We are a group at university that will be editing the page for a while if that's okay. Please get in touch if you have any advice regarding what needs to be improved, or if you feel the edits we have made are inappropriate. Ml15118 ( talk) 13:30, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Abryn ( talk · contribs) 03:38, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
@ Abryn: Thank you for the review! Much appreciated.-- 3E1I5S8B9RF7 ( talk) 15:06, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Rushmore (film) has been listed as one of the
Media and drama good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: November 26, 2019. ( Reviewed version). |
Rushmore (film) received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article. |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
The budget info, like the rest of the Technical data, was taken from IMDb. [1] -- LGagnon 00:12, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
Seems like it might be time to start referencing our data? I was able to find this site with a reference to the Brand New song fact that we need a reference for, but even though it looks like a news article, it's a student paper.-- Hurtstotouchfire 09:41, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
I do not agree with this article's suggestion that the film concludes with Max accepting his relationship with Miss Cross as a friendship. In fact, I would argue the counter. The movie is essentially what Max portrays it to be. It is his "play." He, in my opinions, "ends up" with Miss Cross given the ending. I think the article should be less specific about the ending and its meaning and slightly more open to other perspectives. Opinions? Abacab 06:39, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
I absolutely disagree. the movie is not what max "portrays it to be" the film is about his coming of age and independence as a man. At the end of the film he has matured and accepted his natural role in life as an artist, and a young man. He has margaret chang. he is friends with blume again. and he takes rosemary's hand and dances with her as an acceptance and a farewell to all the previous troubles. he even sets up blume and rosemary in the audience and trys to put them back together by having blume try and build the aquarium again for her as a reconciliation.
VanTucky
06:56, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
You're right that Max matures and accepts a great deal, but there's a definite indication of the same old manipulative Max when he has the DJ put on a specially chosen and especially sentimental song (save lyrics) for his dance with Miss Cross. Certainly, scheming to reconcile Blume with Cross indicates that he does not intend to pursue her (and hence I disagree with the Abacab that he "ends up" with Cross), I think this subtle touch (directing the DJ) indicates that Max will never fully "accept his role in life". If he did, there would be no hope for any of us.
But more pertinently, with respect to editing, the claim that Max accepts his relatinoship with Cross as Platonic is someone's personal interpretation and not factual. (And by the way, it's 'Yang', not 'Chang'. God, watch the movie! :) )
82.45.161.53
20:45, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
I'm removing it for the second time. While it might be interesting to fans of the film, there's really no reason for it to be in this article ( Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information). Please present an argument for why it should be included before reinserting it. Pele Merengue 17:00, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 19:43, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
I hope I have added content that is interesting, but really need some feedback. I'd like to become a valued contributor, so any constructive criticism of what I've done so far will be welcomed by me. I also intend to spend time reading various tutorials..... Any comments you have to help would be greatly appreciated. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Martin1231 ( talk • contribs) 23:51, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
- Here are some links to articles and reviews to help beef up this article.-- J.D. ( talk) 19:31, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
- another article to use.-- J.D. ( talk) 20:32, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
This section is unsourced and in list form. I've moved it here until it can be cited properly and placed in the appropriate sections in the article.-- J.D. ( talk) 19:27, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
References
This section is unsourced and in list form. I've moved it here until it can be cited properly and placed in the appropriate sections in the article.-- J.D. ( talk) 19:41, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
set anywhere in partic? max meets mrs blume in a kinda big city. just wondering. n-dimensional §кakkl€ 19:41, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
Is 404'ed. I don't want to remove the link, as #6 is use several times throughout the article. I did try to (very briefly) to find it again, w/ out any luck. I guess if I ever get back around to this article I'll delete it. Greg343 ( talk) 08:40, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
Hello. We are a group at university that will be editing the page for a while if that's okay. Please get in touch if you have any advice regarding what needs to be improved, or if you feel the edits we have made are inappropriate. Ml15118 ( talk) 13:30, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Abryn ( talk · contribs) 03:38, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
@ Abryn: Thank you for the review! Much appreciated.-- 3E1I5S8B9RF7 ( talk) 15:06, 26 November 2019 (UTC)