![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 |
I wonder whether or not the musicians who played on the track should be listed.
As of July 2007, this articel said "Instead it deals with the trials and tribulations of a floundering relationship, telling her lover in the song that "...if I only could I'd make a deal with God and get him to swap our places". She has described the song as being about the power of love, in that it can create such intense emotion that all rational thought is overpowered.
My impression is that its a genderswapping fantasy. A woman's reassurance to her (male)lover that minor pain from intercourse is OK, and a desire to exchange subjective knowledge of male and female experience of sex. Maybe a little too risque for Wikipedia? I don't see anything about a foundering relationship in the lyrics. Cuvtixo 19:52, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
Added quote from Radio 1 Classic Albums: Hounds of Love interview with Richard Skinner aired January 26, 1992. Cuvtixo 21:38, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
I saw a video of this song with David Gilmour and Kate Bush playing live. Was he involved in the writing of the song, or in the recording, or was it just some one-shot event? David.Monniaux 15:14, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
Image:Running up that hill.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot ( talk) 04:57, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
"Other versions" and "Placebo version" shouldn't be cut appart by "Charts" as it's the same topic. May "Placebo version" be merged with "Other versions" as a sub-chapter. There is also a "dancy" version by Re-Touch in the Faithless compilation Renaissance 3D. Lacrymocéphale 12:57, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
The version by Icon and The Black Roses is distinctly different in style to the other versions but reference to it has recently been removed for reason of it being not sufficiently notable (the band appears to be little known and has no entry at Wikipedia). I hope inclusion of this version might be reconsidered in the future. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.107.132.252 ( talk) 17:51, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
I've gone ahead and moved all cover versions under one master heading. I've attempted to clear up the confusion of header sizes which had crept into that section of the article as well. 75.34.230.119 ( talk) 03:00, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
I removed the following paragraph from the Pop Culture section:
The Placebo cover of the song was featured at the end of the episode "Judas on a Pole" from the US TV series Bones. It was also featured in the fourth season episode " The Avengers" from the US TV series The O.C., the eighth-season episode of C.S.I. titled " A La Cart" and in the theatrical trailer for the 2010 feature film Daybreakers. The Placebo version was also featured in the pilot episode of The Vampire Diaries (TV series) shown at San Diego Comic Con 2009, as well as a video package on WWE programming detailing the Shawn Michaels/ Undertaker feud.
Most if not all this info is already covered in the Placebo version section, and does not need to be duplicated in the section relating to the original version. (I've copied it here in case there is anything left to be merged.) -- RoninBK T C 05:04, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
Since one can Tweet anything one wants to, I don't see how it can be a reliable source for anything. Until there's a second reference that can be read, or in the case of YouTube, viewed for oneself, it's essentially gossip. "Today I heard Band X perform Running Up That Hill on TV show X." What if they have mis-identified the song, or the band? When and if this band's version of RUTH shows up on iTunes, then it can be added to this list. There's also the issue of this section getting wildly out of control--are we going to list every single example of anyone performing or recording the song, no matter how obscure the band?-- TEHodson 08:42, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
Two different (anonymous) editors have claimed two different bands were the artists whose recording of Running was used in the finale of this show. Please cite a source for whichever band you are claiming it was, but do not list it again until there is a reliable reference. Thank you.-- TEHodson 01:20, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
This is a perfect illustration of why we need a reliable source for such information: http://www.tvfanatic.com/2011/10/warehouse-13-review-stand/ . This site states that the song at the end of the show is Placebo's version. You say this is incorrect, and yet some people would argue that TV Fanatic is more reliable. I understand your frustation. The best source would be from the Warehouse 13 site itself (and not the forum or comments). Showtime and HBO give song information on their sites. Can you look for something there?-- TEHodson 05:23, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
Hi guys. There is a link from the iTunes Music Store pointing to Track and Field as the cover artist. Should be a reliable enough source, don't ya think? Regards, 88.183.32.69 ( talk) 19:32, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
I just removed a sourced item to twitter. Twitter fails as a reliable source. Feel free to find a reliable source so that you can add this information back in ! @- Kosh ► Talk to the Vorlons► Moon Base Alpha-@ 18:23, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
You're gonna have to explain how BLP even vaguely applies here, I'm really not sure what you're getting at. You also are overlooking WP:SOCIALMEDIA, which clearly makes exception for people talking about themselves. It's not unreasonable at all to extend that to talking about simple facts related to a show they star in. The tweets were also syndicated on the official SyFy site for the show, as well as SyFy posting the cover to the iTunes Music Store clearly identified as being related to the show. Brandon ( talk) 11:33, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
Brandon, Twitter is not a reliable source per [
| this ], [
this ] , [
| this ] and [
| this ]. Your gonna need a reliable source to put that information in, further because it concerns a living person (notice the name on the account) it fails BLP. I realize I said that earlier, so I'll elaborate a bit more. Per the guideline you cited:
Self-published and questionable sources may be used as sources of information about themselves, usually in articles about themselves or their activities, without the requirement in the case of self-published sources that they be published experts in the field, so long as:
1. the material is not unduly self-serving;
2. it does not involve claims about third parties;
3. it does not involve claims about events not directly related to the source;
4. there is no reasonable doubt as to its authenticity;
5. the article is not based primarily on such sources.
This policy also applies to pages on social networking sites such as Twitter, Tumblr, and Facebook.
(just to let you know I read this and saw this).
First, the entry you placed in is entirely based on one twitter feed, nothing else, second, anyone can claim to be anyone on the internet, we don't actually know that this is the artist, therefore , it automatically fails #4, thirdly, it's used to reference a cover used on a television show, therefore it fails #2.
To be sure, the information's not slanderous or damaging, but because it fails #2 and #4 and is the only source for the information, it can't be used. (and yes, because it's purportely from the singer herself, BLP applies).
I'm going to remove it again. The solution is simple, find a reliable source. @- Kosh ► Talk to the Vorlons► Moon Base Alpha-@ 17:10, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
... Not trying to be a jerk or anything, only going by what I see in policy @- Kosh ► Talk to the Vorlons► Moon Base Alpha-@ 17:22, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
On twitter (as well as anywhere else on the internet )anyone can claim to be anyone, there's no way to verify it. Without that, it fails #4. You also cite itunes and tumblr, both of which are not reliable. Anyone can set up an account on tumblr and claim they're anyone, Itunes is not outright unreliable, depending on what information. As the twitter accounts purport to be the two stars of the show but we can't verify that it fails #2 and strays into BLP. Once again, please find a reliable source (not twitter, not tumblr, not facebook, etc...) @- Kosh ► Talk to the Vorlons► Moon Base Alpha-@ 18:52, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
@- Kosh ► Talk to the Vorlons► Moon Base Alpha-@ 20:35, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
Now there's an on-going dispute between several parties about which episode of the show the Track and Field cover was played on. This is becoming ridiculous. No one has provided a reliable source for that, either, the latest being a montage of clips on YouTube while the song plays (with no band name listed--sounds like Placebo to me); the montage was made by a fan of the show. People passionate enough about this version of the song being mentioned in this article should be passionate enough to find a reliable, indisputable source about 1) who performed the song and 2) over which episode it played. I question the importance of something so obscure that no one can find a good source to cite; it doesn't seem particularly noteworthy to me, but to those of you who disagree, do your homework, please, otherwise, expect it to be taken out again. Thanks.-- TEHodson 23:13, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
This article was previously titled "Running Up That Hill" but was moved last year to "Running Up that Hill". From my understanding of Wikipedia:ALBUMCAPS#Capitalization and Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style_(capital_letters)#Composition_titles I believe the correct capitalisation should be "Running up That Hill" ("Running Up" not being a phrasal verb so "up" as a preposition should not be capitalized, while "That" is not an article so should be capitalized).
Maybe someone with a fuller understanding of capitalization could chip in? memphisto 09:45, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
The Man with the Child in His Eyes ... Running up That Hill ... Never for Ever ... Hounds of Love
Running up that Hill ... Running up that Hill (A Deal With God)
AES Convention:98 (February 1995) Paper Number:4003
{{
cite journal}}
: Cite journal requires |journal=
(
help); Unknown parameter |coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (
help)Unpublished Doctoral thesis, City University London ... 'Running Up That Hill (A Deal With God)' ... 'Running Up that Hill (A Deal with God)' (page 213)
{{
cite journal}}
: Cite journal requires |journal=
(
help)The result of the proposal was moved. -- BDD ( talk) 17:39, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
Running Up that Hill → Running Up That Hill – Per an understanding of title case (even in light of the discussion in the immediately above section) and so that it's consistent with how other things are capitalized. --Qwerty Binary ( talk) 12:27, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Running Up That Hill. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 12:06, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: Not moved. No consensus supporting the proposition. (closed by a page mover) (non-admin closure). Anarchyte ( work | talk) 11:26, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Running Up That Hill → Running Up That Hill (A Deal with God) – This is the more prevalent title since "(A Deal with God)" is the title on the album and all subsequent releases. Also, as the song was released over 30 years ago, "(A Deal with God)" is probably in the original title. 2601:8C:4001:DCF4:0:0:0:6561 ( talk) 13:21, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Running Up That Hill. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://rateyourmusic.com/release/single/within_temptation/running_up_that_hill_f1/{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.allthememories.org/displayimage.php?album=92&pos=17When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 10:46, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: Not moved. ( closed by non-admin page mover) SITH (talk) 18:07, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
Running Up That Hill →
Running Up That Hill (A Deal with God) – I want to bring this back up, as the initial vote was turned down with one opposing reason. Based on everything I have seen, "Running Up That Hill (A Deal with God)" is the full title of the song, even as a single since 1985.
JE98 (
talk) 02:47, 3 April 2019 (UTC) --Relisting.
SITH
(talk) 15:51, 10 April 2019 (UTC)--Relisting. —usernamekiran
(talk) 17:36, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request to
Running Up That Hill has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Can you please add to 2022 weekly chart performance for "Running Up That Hill" - US Billboard Digital Song Sales - 1 Jim003jam ( talk) 11:33, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Thanks Jamie Macdonald
Hello Doc Strange, you recently reverted a minor edit I made to this page, with a justification that is grammatically incorrect. The commas I introduced set of a nonrestrictive clause, in this case, the album's title. Bush only released one album in 1985, and therefore, a comma is required before the album title, as it is not crucial to the coherence of the sentence otherwise (unlike what you pointed out). Please look up nonrestrictive clauses if you disagree, and additionally, if you choose to comment on someone's grammar usage, please make sure you don't make spelling errors ("here me out on this"). Thank you. Revirvlkodlaku ( talk) 19:53, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
At some point we might want to consider not adding any new covers of this song, instead opting to state its popularity with bands, or only listing covers by well-known bands. Maybe remove an old one when adding a new one? I would also suggest calling a halt to listing every single TV show or ad or whatever that uses the Placebo cover--maybe decide if its really notably used or just a fleeting glimpse, or eliminating old ones in favor of new ones. This section is pretty long. I've tightened it up considerably. Other suggestions welcome, of course.-- TEHodson 11:01, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
In addition to having David Gilmour accompanying guitar, Simon LeBon from Duran Duran provided backup vocals and played bass. There are several video clips of this on YouTube, and although it is a little blurry it is clear it is him. I am not 100% sure if Simon plays bass or guitar on it however. Since Gilmour is on guitar, it would make more sense. Scritty ( talk) 13:33, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
The song is projected to re-enter the Billboard charts this week at a new peak, which because of how Billboard's site works, will wipe the citation for the old peak. Links will need to be swapped to an archive if this happens. Hot 100 Mainstream Rock. Dance Club chart is still suspended so that one we don't have to worry about. Dance Singles Sales needs a proper citation, I'm having trouble getting the direct link to it on Billboard but that chart is discontinued so it won't be hitting any new peak there. CAMERAwMUSTACHE ( talk) 18:56, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
Should we have a separate line for "Billboard Global Excl. US"? Billboard counts it separately, or is it too niche a chart to include? -- Stev0 ( talk) 03:13, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 |
I wonder whether or not the musicians who played on the track should be listed.
As of July 2007, this articel said "Instead it deals with the trials and tribulations of a floundering relationship, telling her lover in the song that "...if I only could I'd make a deal with God and get him to swap our places". She has described the song as being about the power of love, in that it can create such intense emotion that all rational thought is overpowered.
My impression is that its a genderswapping fantasy. A woman's reassurance to her (male)lover that minor pain from intercourse is OK, and a desire to exchange subjective knowledge of male and female experience of sex. Maybe a little too risque for Wikipedia? I don't see anything about a foundering relationship in the lyrics. Cuvtixo 19:52, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
Added quote from Radio 1 Classic Albums: Hounds of Love interview with Richard Skinner aired January 26, 1992. Cuvtixo 21:38, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
I saw a video of this song with David Gilmour and Kate Bush playing live. Was he involved in the writing of the song, or in the recording, or was it just some one-shot event? David.Monniaux 15:14, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
Image:Running up that hill.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot ( talk) 04:57, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
"Other versions" and "Placebo version" shouldn't be cut appart by "Charts" as it's the same topic. May "Placebo version" be merged with "Other versions" as a sub-chapter. There is also a "dancy" version by Re-Touch in the Faithless compilation Renaissance 3D. Lacrymocéphale 12:57, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
The version by Icon and The Black Roses is distinctly different in style to the other versions but reference to it has recently been removed for reason of it being not sufficiently notable (the band appears to be little known and has no entry at Wikipedia). I hope inclusion of this version might be reconsidered in the future. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.107.132.252 ( talk) 17:51, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
I've gone ahead and moved all cover versions under one master heading. I've attempted to clear up the confusion of header sizes which had crept into that section of the article as well. 75.34.230.119 ( talk) 03:00, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
I removed the following paragraph from the Pop Culture section:
The Placebo cover of the song was featured at the end of the episode "Judas on a Pole" from the US TV series Bones. It was also featured in the fourth season episode " The Avengers" from the US TV series The O.C., the eighth-season episode of C.S.I. titled " A La Cart" and in the theatrical trailer for the 2010 feature film Daybreakers. The Placebo version was also featured in the pilot episode of The Vampire Diaries (TV series) shown at San Diego Comic Con 2009, as well as a video package on WWE programming detailing the Shawn Michaels/ Undertaker feud.
Most if not all this info is already covered in the Placebo version section, and does not need to be duplicated in the section relating to the original version. (I've copied it here in case there is anything left to be merged.) -- RoninBK T C 05:04, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
Since one can Tweet anything one wants to, I don't see how it can be a reliable source for anything. Until there's a second reference that can be read, or in the case of YouTube, viewed for oneself, it's essentially gossip. "Today I heard Band X perform Running Up That Hill on TV show X." What if they have mis-identified the song, or the band? When and if this band's version of RUTH shows up on iTunes, then it can be added to this list. There's also the issue of this section getting wildly out of control--are we going to list every single example of anyone performing or recording the song, no matter how obscure the band?-- TEHodson 08:42, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
Two different (anonymous) editors have claimed two different bands were the artists whose recording of Running was used in the finale of this show. Please cite a source for whichever band you are claiming it was, but do not list it again until there is a reliable reference. Thank you.-- TEHodson 01:20, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
This is a perfect illustration of why we need a reliable source for such information: http://www.tvfanatic.com/2011/10/warehouse-13-review-stand/ . This site states that the song at the end of the show is Placebo's version. You say this is incorrect, and yet some people would argue that TV Fanatic is more reliable. I understand your frustation. The best source would be from the Warehouse 13 site itself (and not the forum or comments). Showtime and HBO give song information on their sites. Can you look for something there?-- TEHodson 05:23, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
Hi guys. There is a link from the iTunes Music Store pointing to Track and Field as the cover artist. Should be a reliable enough source, don't ya think? Regards, 88.183.32.69 ( talk) 19:32, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
I just removed a sourced item to twitter. Twitter fails as a reliable source. Feel free to find a reliable source so that you can add this information back in ! @- Kosh ► Talk to the Vorlons► Moon Base Alpha-@ 18:23, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
You're gonna have to explain how BLP even vaguely applies here, I'm really not sure what you're getting at. You also are overlooking WP:SOCIALMEDIA, which clearly makes exception for people talking about themselves. It's not unreasonable at all to extend that to talking about simple facts related to a show they star in. The tweets were also syndicated on the official SyFy site for the show, as well as SyFy posting the cover to the iTunes Music Store clearly identified as being related to the show. Brandon ( talk) 11:33, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
Brandon, Twitter is not a reliable source per [
| this ], [
this ] , [
| this ] and [
| this ]. Your gonna need a reliable source to put that information in, further because it concerns a living person (notice the name on the account) it fails BLP. I realize I said that earlier, so I'll elaborate a bit more. Per the guideline you cited:
Self-published and questionable sources may be used as sources of information about themselves, usually in articles about themselves or their activities, without the requirement in the case of self-published sources that they be published experts in the field, so long as:
1. the material is not unduly self-serving;
2. it does not involve claims about third parties;
3. it does not involve claims about events not directly related to the source;
4. there is no reasonable doubt as to its authenticity;
5. the article is not based primarily on such sources.
This policy also applies to pages on social networking sites such as Twitter, Tumblr, and Facebook.
(just to let you know I read this and saw this).
First, the entry you placed in is entirely based on one twitter feed, nothing else, second, anyone can claim to be anyone on the internet, we don't actually know that this is the artist, therefore , it automatically fails #4, thirdly, it's used to reference a cover used on a television show, therefore it fails #2.
To be sure, the information's not slanderous or damaging, but because it fails #2 and #4 and is the only source for the information, it can't be used. (and yes, because it's purportely from the singer herself, BLP applies).
I'm going to remove it again. The solution is simple, find a reliable source. @- Kosh ► Talk to the Vorlons► Moon Base Alpha-@ 17:10, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
... Not trying to be a jerk or anything, only going by what I see in policy @- Kosh ► Talk to the Vorlons► Moon Base Alpha-@ 17:22, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
On twitter (as well as anywhere else on the internet )anyone can claim to be anyone, there's no way to verify it. Without that, it fails #4. You also cite itunes and tumblr, both of which are not reliable. Anyone can set up an account on tumblr and claim they're anyone, Itunes is not outright unreliable, depending on what information. As the twitter accounts purport to be the two stars of the show but we can't verify that it fails #2 and strays into BLP. Once again, please find a reliable source (not twitter, not tumblr, not facebook, etc...) @- Kosh ► Talk to the Vorlons► Moon Base Alpha-@ 18:52, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
@- Kosh ► Talk to the Vorlons► Moon Base Alpha-@ 20:35, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
Now there's an on-going dispute between several parties about which episode of the show the Track and Field cover was played on. This is becoming ridiculous. No one has provided a reliable source for that, either, the latest being a montage of clips on YouTube while the song plays (with no band name listed--sounds like Placebo to me); the montage was made by a fan of the show. People passionate enough about this version of the song being mentioned in this article should be passionate enough to find a reliable, indisputable source about 1) who performed the song and 2) over which episode it played. I question the importance of something so obscure that no one can find a good source to cite; it doesn't seem particularly noteworthy to me, but to those of you who disagree, do your homework, please, otherwise, expect it to be taken out again. Thanks.-- TEHodson 23:13, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
This article was previously titled "Running Up That Hill" but was moved last year to "Running Up that Hill". From my understanding of Wikipedia:ALBUMCAPS#Capitalization and Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style_(capital_letters)#Composition_titles I believe the correct capitalisation should be "Running up That Hill" ("Running Up" not being a phrasal verb so "up" as a preposition should not be capitalized, while "That" is not an article so should be capitalized).
Maybe someone with a fuller understanding of capitalization could chip in? memphisto 09:45, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
The Man with the Child in His Eyes ... Running up That Hill ... Never for Ever ... Hounds of Love
Running up that Hill ... Running up that Hill (A Deal With God)
AES Convention:98 (February 1995) Paper Number:4003
{{
cite journal}}
: Cite journal requires |journal=
(
help); Unknown parameter |coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (
help)Unpublished Doctoral thesis, City University London ... 'Running Up That Hill (A Deal With God)' ... 'Running Up that Hill (A Deal with God)' (page 213)
{{
cite journal}}
: Cite journal requires |journal=
(
help)The result of the proposal was moved. -- BDD ( talk) 17:39, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
Running Up that Hill → Running Up That Hill – Per an understanding of title case (even in light of the discussion in the immediately above section) and so that it's consistent with how other things are capitalized. --Qwerty Binary ( talk) 12:27, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Running Up That Hill. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 12:06, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: Not moved. No consensus supporting the proposition. (closed by a page mover) (non-admin closure). Anarchyte ( work | talk) 11:26, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Running Up That Hill → Running Up That Hill (A Deal with God) – This is the more prevalent title since "(A Deal with God)" is the title on the album and all subsequent releases. Also, as the song was released over 30 years ago, "(A Deal with God)" is probably in the original title. 2601:8C:4001:DCF4:0:0:0:6561 ( talk) 13:21, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Running Up That Hill. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://rateyourmusic.com/release/single/within_temptation/running_up_that_hill_f1/{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.allthememories.org/displayimage.php?album=92&pos=17When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 10:46, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: Not moved. ( closed by non-admin page mover) SITH (talk) 18:07, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
Running Up That Hill →
Running Up That Hill (A Deal with God) – I want to bring this back up, as the initial vote was turned down with one opposing reason. Based on everything I have seen, "Running Up That Hill (A Deal with God)" is the full title of the song, even as a single since 1985.
JE98 (
talk) 02:47, 3 April 2019 (UTC) --Relisting.
SITH
(talk) 15:51, 10 April 2019 (UTC)--Relisting. —usernamekiran
(talk) 17:36, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request to
Running Up That Hill has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Can you please add to 2022 weekly chart performance for "Running Up That Hill" - US Billboard Digital Song Sales - 1 Jim003jam ( talk) 11:33, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Thanks Jamie Macdonald
Hello Doc Strange, you recently reverted a minor edit I made to this page, with a justification that is grammatically incorrect. The commas I introduced set of a nonrestrictive clause, in this case, the album's title. Bush only released one album in 1985, and therefore, a comma is required before the album title, as it is not crucial to the coherence of the sentence otherwise (unlike what you pointed out). Please look up nonrestrictive clauses if you disagree, and additionally, if you choose to comment on someone's grammar usage, please make sure you don't make spelling errors ("here me out on this"). Thank you. Revirvlkodlaku ( talk) 19:53, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
At some point we might want to consider not adding any new covers of this song, instead opting to state its popularity with bands, or only listing covers by well-known bands. Maybe remove an old one when adding a new one? I would also suggest calling a halt to listing every single TV show or ad or whatever that uses the Placebo cover--maybe decide if its really notably used or just a fleeting glimpse, or eliminating old ones in favor of new ones. This section is pretty long. I've tightened it up considerably. Other suggestions welcome, of course.-- TEHodson 11:01, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
In addition to having David Gilmour accompanying guitar, Simon LeBon from Duran Duran provided backup vocals and played bass. There are several video clips of this on YouTube, and although it is a little blurry it is clear it is him. I am not 100% sure if Simon plays bass or guitar on it however. Since Gilmour is on guitar, it would make more sense. Scritty ( talk) 13:33, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
The song is projected to re-enter the Billboard charts this week at a new peak, which because of how Billboard's site works, will wipe the citation for the old peak. Links will need to be swapped to an archive if this happens. Hot 100 Mainstream Rock. Dance Club chart is still suspended so that one we don't have to worry about. Dance Singles Sales needs a proper citation, I'm having trouble getting the direct link to it on Billboard but that chart is discontinued so it won't be hitting any new peak there. CAMERAwMUSTACHE ( talk) 18:56, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
Should we have a separate line for "Billboard Global Excl. US"? Billboard counts it separately, or is it too niche a chart to include? -- Stev0 ( talk) 03:13, 18 July 2022 (UTC)