![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It seems like the article was started to heroize the traitor Vyhovsky. Wikipedia does not need nationalist oversimplifications. Please consider rewriting. -- Ghirla -трёп- 15:08, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
I attempted to link the page from The Ruin, but it appears that the latter page is owned by someone, who claims that the name for this period "was fabricated by myself". Third opinions are welcome on Talk:The Ruin. -- Ghirla -трёп- 08:42, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
The removal of the definite article adjective from "the Ukraine" to form "Ukraine" is supported by published style guides as referred to in Name of Ukraine #Syntax. User:70.27.90.213 should post some evidence of current grammatical rules that support the change of seven instances of "Ukraine" to "the Ukraine" in edit number 364520860 on the 27th of May or these changes should be reversed. -- Fartherred ( talk) 01:36, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
The tone of this article's intro is not academic and attempts to portray heroically the image of Khmelnitsky. The first few lines are just compliments and asides about him that do not relate whatsoever to the period about which this article is supposedly written. Given his ambiguous legacy, and his documented massacres of Jews and Poles, this is not an academic approach to writing and should be reworded. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.104.148.66 ( talk) 17:00, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 15:07, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It seems like the article was started to heroize the traitor Vyhovsky. Wikipedia does not need nationalist oversimplifications. Please consider rewriting. -- Ghirla -трёп- 15:08, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
I attempted to link the page from The Ruin, but it appears that the latter page is owned by someone, who claims that the name for this period "was fabricated by myself". Third opinions are welcome on Talk:The Ruin. -- Ghirla -трёп- 08:42, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
The removal of the definite article adjective from "the Ukraine" to form "Ukraine" is supported by published style guides as referred to in Name of Ukraine #Syntax. User:70.27.90.213 should post some evidence of current grammatical rules that support the change of seven instances of "Ukraine" to "the Ukraine" in edit number 364520860 on the 27th of May or these changes should be reversed. -- Fartherred ( talk) 01:36, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
The tone of this article's intro is not academic and attempts to portray heroically the image of Khmelnitsky. The first few lines are just compliments and asides about him that do not relate whatsoever to the period about which this article is supposedly written. Given his ambiguous legacy, and his documented massacres of Jews and Poles, this is not an academic approach to writing and should be reworded. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.104.148.66 ( talk) 17:00, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 15:07, 27 December 2022 (UTC)