This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Ruby Tuesday (restaurant) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Ruby Tuesday (restaurant) was a Agriculture, food and drink good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Former good article nominee |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I work for Ruby Tuesday (the St. Louis area franchise), and I am one to tell you that I have never heard of Ruby's having three signature items - the double picture, the upside down one, and the floor tile. In fact, I am 100% sure that neither of the two stores I have worked at have a misplaced floor tile. I'll look around the restaurant tomorrow and see if I can find the double picture and the upside-down one... but I've never heard of that before! Whoever added that to the article, where'd you get that info from? -- 209.145.160.65 08:18, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
Can we get a citation that the restaurant is indeed named after the Rolling Stones song? I couldn't find anything about it on their website. PolarisSLBM 20:35, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
The information contained in the Controversy section isn't really relevant. This seems like a one time deal that doesn't really affect the company at all. I propose that it be deleted. 207.203.147.20 18:27, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
I have trimmed this per WP:GTL. If there is a fucking reason to include thses articles can it please be discussed here? Thank you. -- 70.109.223.188 ( talk) 17:58, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
See also is not a link farm. There are probably 20-30 more links that could be added by your logic. Why are these perticular ones being added? You should provide an explaination per the guideline. -- 70.109.223.188 ( talk) 19:52, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
is the picture in the Re-branding section needed? Breawycker ( talk) 13:09, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
It may be interesting to mention the exit from the state of California (except for one location remaining at the San Jose Airport); I believe that there were many in the state at one point. Jim ( talk) 22:45, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
I am looking to have this article assessed and upgraded to B-Class quality. Any comments, ideas, and suggestions on what to improve would be appreciated. Chilled616 ( talk) 07:12, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
Thanks. I have added references for almost all of the WP:Citation needed tags. I am considering removing the other material as I can not find an adequate citation. I have input additional content recently, and plan to add more to the History section to improve it. I would like to get this article to GA-class, and would like to hear any suggestions you have. Also, you downgraded the article from Mid-importance to Low-importance. Was that a mistake? If not, could you please explain? Chilled616 ( talk) 23:52, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
I would like to add pictures to the article that are not of the front of the buildings. Interior pictures, a picture of one of their race cars, or any other relevant picture that is free and not copyrighted would be appreciated. With the addition, I would like to get rid of at least one of the many redundant building pictures in the article. Any thoughts? Chilled616 ( talk) 23:52, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
At the end of the article, it says that all of the employees of the 95 stores were laid off. I work at RT and that's not true - if there were other stores in the area, employees were allowed to transfer. Also, nowhere on the MSN article cited does it say they were. Can we change this? :) -- 97.91.210.39 ( talk) 20:44, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Hahc21 ( talk · contribs) 01:29, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Well, I'll stop here by now. After those issues are solved, I continue with the review. I'm putting the article on hold. — Hahc 21 04:18, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Ruby Tuesday (restaurant). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 17:58, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Ruby Tuesday (restaurant) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Ruby Tuesday (restaurant) was a Agriculture, food and drink good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Former good article nominee |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I work for Ruby Tuesday (the St. Louis area franchise), and I am one to tell you that I have never heard of Ruby's having three signature items - the double picture, the upside down one, and the floor tile. In fact, I am 100% sure that neither of the two stores I have worked at have a misplaced floor tile. I'll look around the restaurant tomorrow and see if I can find the double picture and the upside-down one... but I've never heard of that before! Whoever added that to the article, where'd you get that info from? -- 209.145.160.65 08:18, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
Can we get a citation that the restaurant is indeed named after the Rolling Stones song? I couldn't find anything about it on their website. PolarisSLBM 20:35, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
The information contained in the Controversy section isn't really relevant. This seems like a one time deal that doesn't really affect the company at all. I propose that it be deleted. 207.203.147.20 18:27, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
I have trimmed this per WP:GTL. If there is a fucking reason to include thses articles can it please be discussed here? Thank you. -- 70.109.223.188 ( talk) 17:58, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
See also is not a link farm. There are probably 20-30 more links that could be added by your logic. Why are these perticular ones being added? You should provide an explaination per the guideline. -- 70.109.223.188 ( talk) 19:52, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
is the picture in the Re-branding section needed? Breawycker ( talk) 13:09, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
It may be interesting to mention the exit from the state of California (except for one location remaining at the San Jose Airport); I believe that there were many in the state at one point. Jim ( talk) 22:45, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
I am looking to have this article assessed and upgraded to B-Class quality. Any comments, ideas, and suggestions on what to improve would be appreciated. Chilled616 ( talk) 07:12, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
Thanks. I have added references for almost all of the WP:Citation needed tags. I am considering removing the other material as I can not find an adequate citation. I have input additional content recently, and plan to add more to the History section to improve it. I would like to get this article to GA-class, and would like to hear any suggestions you have. Also, you downgraded the article from Mid-importance to Low-importance. Was that a mistake? If not, could you please explain? Chilled616 ( talk) 23:52, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
I would like to add pictures to the article that are not of the front of the buildings. Interior pictures, a picture of one of their race cars, or any other relevant picture that is free and not copyrighted would be appreciated. With the addition, I would like to get rid of at least one of the many redundant building pictures in the article. Any thoughts? Chilled616 ( talk) 23:52, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
At the end of the article, it says that all of the employees of the 95 stores were laid off. I work at RT and that's not true - if there were other stores in the area, employees were allowed to transfer. Also, nowhere on the MSN article cited does it say they were. Can we change this? :) -- 97.91.210.39 ( talk) 20:44, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Hahc21 ( talk · contribs) 01:29, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Well, I'll stop here by now. After those issues are solved, I continue with the review. I'm putting the article on hold. — Hahc 21 04:18, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Ruby Tuesday (restaurant). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 17:58, 24 May 2017 (UTC)