![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
All the titles already appear in the biography (the source should be added there), so I don't think it's a problem if there's also a separate section to make it easier to find them. Maria0215 ( talk) 16:57, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
Moved to Gwiin Jo (Injo). See consensus below to rename this article; however, see no agreement for any particular new title. WP:OTHEROPTIONS leads us to choose among the following names:
For now at least, the best choice appears to be Gwiin Jo (Injo). OTHEROPTIONS tells us, "the closer should pick the best title of the options available, and then be clear that while consensus has rejected the former title (and no request to bring it back should be made lightly), there is no consensus for the title actually chosen. And if anyone objects to the closer's choice, then instead of taking it to move review, they should simply make another move request at any time, which will hopefully lead the article to its final stable title." Thanks and kudos to editors for your input; good health to all! P.I. Ellsworth - ed. put'r there 05:01, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
Royal Consort Gwiin Jo → ? – Gwi-in means Consort so the current title is equivalent to Royal Consort Royal Consort Jo. It's also not found in any reliable sources. The article title should adhere to Wikipedia:Article titles, not be an unrecognizable and invented mish-mash. DrKay ( talk) 20:11, 22 March 2022 (UTC) — Relisting. 🐶 EpicPupper (he/him | talk) 20:56, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
Deceased consorts are referred to by a name by which they are commonly known🐶 EpicPupper (he/him | talk) 22:49, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
If there are too few reliable English-language sources to constitute an established usage, follow the conventions of the language appropriate to the subject. I could only find two reliable English-language refences mentioning her, [1] [2] (Note that WP:CONTEXTMATTERS for reliability; articles from the entertainment section of newspapers, let alone self-published fansites, are not reliable sources about history.) 61.239.39.90 ( talk) 10:16, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
References
2nd class Concubine from the Jo clan (deposed gwiin)
Injo had ... two sons and one daughter by concubine Cho
The article titles for monarchs should use the format Name (the Great) of Kingdom. For example: Seondeok of Silla; Sejong the Great of Joseon; Gojong of Korea(formatting original) but has no explicit rule on consorts. Rotideypoc41352 ( talk · contribs) 01:29, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
Everwhere in the article she is called "Park". The title should match). Thank you for the clarification. To clarify myself, I thought closer should know that this close may potentially affect many other articles with similar names beyond Royal Consort Gwiin Jo (Cheoljong) VocalIndia (now indef'd) mentioned above. Rotideypoc41352 ( talk · contribs) 15:40, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
All the titles already appear in the biography (the source should be added there), so I don't think it's a problem if there's also a separate section to make it easier to find them. Maria0215 ( talk) 16:57, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
Moved to Gwiin Jo (Injo). See consensus below to rename this article; however, see no agreement for any particular new title. WP:OTHEROPTIONS leads us to choose among the following names:
For now at least, the best choice appears to be Gwiin Jo (Injo). OTHEROPTIONS tells us, "the closer should pick the best title of the options available, and then be clear that while consensus has rejected the former title (and no request to bring it back should be made lightly), there is no consensus for the title actually chosen. And if anyone objects to the closer's choice, then instead of taking it to move review, they should simply make another move request at any time, which will hopefully lead the article to its final stable title." Thanks and kudos to editors for your input; good health to all! P.I. Ellsworth - ed. put'r there 05:01, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
Royal Consort Gwiin Jo → ? – Gwi-in means Consort so the current title is equivalent to Royal Consort Royal Consort Jo. It's also not found in any reliable sources. The article title should adhere to Wikipedia:Article titles, not be an unrecognizable and invented mish-mash. DrKay ( talk) 20:11, 22 March 2022 (UTC) — Relisting. 🐶 EpicPupper (he/him | talk) 20:56, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
Deceased consorts are referred to by a name by which they are commonly known🐶 EpicPupper (he/him | talk) 22:49, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
If there are too few reliable English-language sources to constitute an established usage, follow the conventions of the language appropriate to the subject. I could only find two reliable English-language refences mentioning her, [1] [2] (Note that WP:CONTEXTMATTERS for reliability; articles from the entertainment section of newspapers, let alone self-published fansites, are not reliable sources about history.) 61.239.39.90 ( talk) 10:16, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
References
2nd class Concubine from the Jo clan (deposed gwiin)
Injo had ... two sons and one daughter by concubine Cho
The article titles for monarchs should use the format Name (the Great) of Kingdom. For example: Seondeok of Silla; Sejong the Great of Joseon; Gojong of Korea(formatting original) but has no explicit rule on consorts. Rotideypoc41352 ( talk · contribs) 01:29, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
Everwhere in the article she is called "Park". The title should match). Thank you for the clarification. To clarify myself, I thought closer should know that this close may potentially affect many other articles with similar names beyond Royal Consort Gwiin Jo (Cheoljong) VocalIndia (now indef'd) mentioned above. Rotideypoc41352 ( talk · contribs) 15:40, 24 April 2022 (UTC)