![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
uh, wtf is this prod template? why is there no AFD where I can air my objections? why is there not rationale beyond a link to WP:NOT? where am I supposed to object to these deletions? Modest Genius talk 00:29, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
I propose the article be merged with Theatre Royal, Nottingham.
The rationale behind the merge is, first that this article is a strong AFD candiate. It's just a tram stop; there's not a lot that could be written about it, it has no notability and the article has no references. Some of the near identical articles about Nottingham Tram Stops have been deleted for that reason.
Secondly, merging would keep it in line with other Nottingham Tram Stops. The tram stops are not deserving of their own article because there is not enough to write about; but they sit very comfortably as a section within the articles of the places they serve. This already happens with other Nottingham Tram Stops - For Example: Old Market Square tram stop redirects to the article about the Old Market Square and the tram stop has its own section within that article. The same happens with The Forest tram stop which redirects to a section within the Forest Recreation Ground. Both work well and are a better approach than the current empty unreferenced article.
-- Rushton2010 ( talk) 10:23, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
uh, wtf is this prod template? why is there no AFD where I can air my objections? why is there not rationale beyond a link to WP:NOT? where am I supposed to object to these deletions? Modest Genius talk 00:29, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
I propose the article be merged with Theatre Royal, Nottingham.
The rationale behind the merge is, first that this article is a strong AFD candiate. It's just a tram stop; there's not a lot that could be written about it, it has no notability and the article has no references. Some of the near identical articles about Nottingham Tram Stops have been deleted for that reason.
Secondly, merging would keep it in line with other Nottingham Tram Stops. The tram stops are not deserving of their own article because there is not enough to write about; but they sit very comfortably as a section within the articles of the places they serve. This already happens with other Nottingham Tram Stops - For Example: Old Market Square tram stop redirects to the article about the Old Market Square and the tram stop has its own section within that article. The same happens with The Forest tram stop which redirects to a section within the Forest Recreation Ground. Both work well and are a better approach than the current empty unreferenced article.
-- Rushton2010 ( talk) 10:23, 15 August 2013 (UTC)