This article is within the scope of WikiProject Automobiles, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
automobiles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AutomobilesWikipedia:WikiProject AutomobilesTemplate:WikiProject AutomobilesAutomobile articles
Royal Automobile Club of Queensland is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of
Australia and
Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the
project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the
project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
The
Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.
The following Wikipedia contributors may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include
conflict of interest,
autobiography, and
neutral point of view.
For some reason, the title of this article was "Royal Automobile Club of Queensland Limited" from its creation. I have now removed the "Limited" from this title. -
Mark 16:04, 6 September 2006 (UTC)reply
8 July 2015 edits
I'm not convinced these edits
[1] are suitable. Ignoring the fact that they were added, removed and re-added by two
WP:ORGNAME users, I believe this falls under the category of
WP:NOTNEWS. --
Drm310 (
talk) 15:59, 9 July 2015 (UTC)reply
9th July edits
It appears that RACQ staffers have been editing the page (removing local information) in the belief that Wiki is an authorised company page. [(4,858 bytes) (-1,213) . . (remove unauthorised information from company page as authorised communications staff member)] [04:40, 9 July 2015 RACQ Official (talk | contribs) . . (4,761 bytes) (-8) . . (undo | thank)] I am not sure that they are unbiased. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Evmuseum (
talk •
contribs)
And the edits claiming to be from an "authorised communications staff member" of RACQ and a "RACQ Official" account were reverted with notice to the former (the latter was blocked from editing) that
RACQ doesn't own this page. If the information is removed, it will not be for that reason (though its long-term relevance to an encyclopaedic article on RACQ is questionable, as mentioned in the section above, so it could be removed for that reason). General IzationTalk 23:41, 9 July 2015 (UTC)reply
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Automobiles, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
automobiles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AutomobilesWikipedia:WikiProject AutomobilesTemplate:WikiProject AutomobilesAutomobile articles
Royal Automobile Club of Queensland is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of
Australia and
Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the
project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the
project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
The
Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.
The following Wikipedia contributors may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include
conflict of interest,
autobiography, and
neutral point of view.
For some reason, the title of this article was "Royal Automobile Club of Queensland Limited" from its creation. I have now removed the "Limited" from this title. -
Mark 16:04, 6 September 2006 (UTC)reply
8 July 2015 edits
I'm not convinced these edits
[1] are suitable. Ignoring the fact that they were added, removed and re-added by two
WP:ORGNAME users, I believe this falls under the category of
WP:NOTNEWS. --
Drm310 (
talk) 15:59, 9 July 2015 (UTC)reply
9th July edits
It appears that RACQ staffers have been editing the page (removing local information) in the belief that Wiki is an authorised company page. [(4,858 bytes) (-1,213) . . (remove unauthorised information from company page as authorised communications staff member)] [04:40, 9 July 2015 RACQ Official (talk | contribs) . . (4,761 bytes) (-8) . . (undo | thank)] I am not sure that they are unbiased. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Evmuseum (
talk •
contribs)
And the edits claiming to be from an "authorised communications staff member" of RACQ and a "RACQ Official" account were reverted with notice to the former (the latter was blocked from editing) that
RACQ doesn't own this page. If the information is removed, it will not be for that reason (though its long-term relevance to an encyclopaedic article on RACQ is questionable, as mentioned in the section above, so it could be removed for that reason). General IzationTalk 23:41, 9 July 2015 (UTC)reply