This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Bridges and Tunnels Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bridges and Tunnels, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of bridges and tunnels on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Bridges and TunnelsWikipedia:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsTemplate:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsBridge and Tunnel articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. UK Waterways High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject UK Waterways, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of UK Waterways on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.UK WaterwaysWikipedia:WikiProject UK WaterwaysTemplate:WikiProject UK WaterwaysUK Waterways articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Note: these bridges are more frequently termed 'turnover bridges' - the article says the term 'roving bridge' is applied to 'side bridges' and this is, in fact, its usual meaning. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.114.50.71 ( talk) 18:30, 4 November 2009 (UTC) reply

Can you cite a reliable source for that statement please?-- Shantavira| ^{feed me} 17:22, 8 March 2012 (UTC) reply

McKnight (1981) and Cumberlidge (2009) both say that "turnover bridge" and "roving bridge" are alternative names for the type where the horse turns through 360 degrees. Bob1960evens ( talk) 22:07, 9 March 2012 (UTC) reply